Short-Term Morbidity of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in a Contemporary Group of Patients

Stephen D W Beck, Matthew D. Peterson, Richard Bihrle, John P. Donohue, Richard Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We defined the blood loss, operative time and short-term morbidity of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary series to assess whether laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection actually confers the magnitude of benefit claimed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during the 18 months ending May 2005. Two patients were excluded, including 1 who underwent right hemicolectomy for cecal adenocarcinoma and 1 with a pure seminomatous intra-abdominal testicle. Results: Of the 73 patients 69 (94%) underwent unilateral dissection and 60 (82.2%) underwent a nerve sparing procedure. Mean operative time was 132 minutes (range 81 to 246) and mean blood loss was 207 cc (range 50 to 500). Nasogastric tubes were placed in 2 patients (2.7%). Mean time to start clear liquids was 1.0 day. Mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 2 to 4). Conclusions: The short-term morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, including operative time, blood loss and hospital stay, has significantly improved compared to historical controls. Perioperative management has changed with time. Comparing the morbidity of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection to that of historical controls is inappropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)504-506
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume178
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Lymph Node Excision
Morbidity
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Testis
Dissection
Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

  • laparoscopy
  • lymph node excision
  • morbidity
  • testicular neoplasms
  • testis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Short-Term Morbidity of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in a Contemporary Group of Patients. / Beck, Stephen D W; Peterson, Matthew D.; Bihrle, Richard; Donohue, John P.; Foster, Richard.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 178, No. 2, 08.2007, p. 504-506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beck, Stephen D W ; Peterson, Matthew D. ; Bihrle, Richard ; Donohue, John P. ; Foster, Richard. / Short-Term Morbidity of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in a Contemporary Group of Patients. In: Journal of Urology. 2007 ; Vol. 178, No. 2. pp. 504-506.
@article{443df87ef83846cea3a024bf23f1b8f4,
title = "Short-Term Morbidity of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in a Contemporary Group of Patients",
abstract = "Purpose: We defined the blood loss, operative time and short-term morbidity of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary series to assess whether laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection actually confers the magnitude of benefit claimed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during the 18 months ending May 2005. Two patients were excluded, including 1 who underwent right hemicolectomy for cecal adenocarcinoma and 1 with a pure seminomatous intra-abdominal testicle. Results: Of the 73 patients 69 (94{\%}) underwent unilateral dissection and 60 (82.2{\%}) underwent a nerve sparing procedure. Mean operative time was 132 minutes (range 81 to 246) and mean blood loss was 207 cc (range 50 to 500). Nasogastric tubes were placed in 2 patients (2.7{\%}). Mean time to start clear liquids was 1.0 day. Mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 2 to 4). Conclusions: The short-term morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, including operative time, blood loss and hospital stay, has significantly improved compared to historical controls. Perioperative management has changed with time. Comparing the morbidity of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection to that of historical controls is inappropriate.",
keywords = "laparoscopy, lymph node excision, morbidity, testicular neoplasms, testis",
author = "Beck, {Stephen D W} and Peterson, {Matthew D.} and Richard Bihrle and Donohue, {John P.} and Richard Foster",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.123",
language = "English",
volume = "178",
pages = "504--506",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short-Term Morbidity of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in a Contemporary Group of Patients

AU - Beck, Stephen D W

AU - Peterson, Matthew D.

AU - Bihrle, Richard

AU - Donohue, John P.

AU - Foster, Richard

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Purpose: We defined the blood loss, operative time and short-term morbidity of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary series to assess whether laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection actually confers the magnitude of benefit claimed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during the 18 months ending May 2005. Two patients were excluded, including 1 who underwent right hemicolectomy for cecal adenocarcinoma and 1 with a pure seminomatous intra-abdominal testicle. Results: Of the 73 patients 69 (94%) underwent unilateral dissection and 60 (82.2%) underwent a nerve sparing procedure. Mean operative time was 132 minutes (range 81 to 246) and mean blood loss was 207 cc (range 50 to 500). Nasogastric tubes were placed in 2 patients (2.7%). Mean time to start clear liquids was 1.0 day. Mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 2 to 4). Conclusions: The short-term morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, including operative time, blood loss and hospital stay, has significantly improved compared to historical controls. Perioperative management has changed with time. Comparing the morbidity of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection to that of historical controls is inappropriate.

AB - Purpose: We defined the blood loss, operative time and short-term morbidity of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary series to assess whether laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection actually confers the magnitude of benefit claimed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection during the 18 months ending May 2005. Two patients were excluded, including 1 who underwent right hemicolectomy for cecal adenocarcinoma and 1 with a pure seminomatous intra-abdominal testicle. Results: Of the 73 patients 69 (94%) underwent unilateral dissection and 60 (82.2%) underwent a nerve sparing procedure. Mean operative time was 132 minutes (range 81 to 246) and mean blood loss was 207 cc (range 50 to 500). Nasogastric tubes were placed in 2 patients (2.7%). Mean time to start clear liquids was 1.0 day. Mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 2 to 4). Conclusions: The short-term morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, including operative time, blood loss and hospital stay, has significantly improved compared to historical controls. Perioperative management has changed with time. Comparing the morbidity of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection to that of historical controls is inappropriate.

KW - laparoscopy

KW - lymph node excision

KW - morbidity

KW - testicular neoplasms

KW - testis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447103391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447103391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.123

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.123

M3 - Article

C2 - 17561131

AN - SCOPUS:34447103391

VL - 178

SP - 504

EP - 506

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -