Should Live Patient Licensing Examinations in Dentistry Be Discontinued? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Alternative Assessment Models Are Not Yet Viable Replacements for Live Patients in Clinical Licensure Exams and Viewpoint 2: Ethical and Patient Care Concerns About Live Patient Exams Require Full Acceptance of Justifiable Alternatives

T.M. Gabriel Chu, Nicholas M. Makhoul, Daniela Rodrigues Silva, Theresa S. Gonzales, Ariadne Letra, Keith A. Mays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This Point/Counterpoint article addresses a long-standing but still-unresolved debate on the advantages and disadvantages of using live patients in dental licensure exams. Two contrasting viewpoints are presented. Viewpoint 1 supports the traditional use of live patients, arguing that other assessment models have not yet been demonstrated to be viable alternatives to the actual treatment of patients in the clinical licensure process. This viewpoint also contends that the use of live patients and inherent variances in live patient treatment represent the realities of daily private practice. Viewpoint 2 argues that the use of live patients in licensure exams needs to be discontinued considering those exams' ethical dilemmas of exposing patients to potential harm, as well as their lack of reliability and validity and limited scope. According to this viewpoint, the current presence of viable alternatives means that the risk of harm inherent in live patient exams can finally be eliminated and those exams replaced with other means to confirm that candidates are qualified for licensure to practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-251
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Dental Education
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dentistry
Licensure
Dentistry
patient care
Patient Care
acceptance
examination
candidacy
lack
Dental Licensure
Private Practice
Reproducibility of Results
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • assessment
  • clinical examination
  • clinical licensure
  • dental education
  • live patient examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{8322af845f0d4da68c63e20f2abe84c5,
title = "Should Live Patient Licensing Examinations in Dentistry Be Discontinued? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Alternative Assessment Models Are Not Yet Viable Replacements for Live Patients in Clinical Licensure Exams and Viewpoint 2: Ethical and Patient Care Concerns About Live Patient Exams Require Full Acceptance of Justifiable Alternatives",
abstract = "This Point/Counterpoint article addresses a long-standing but still-unresolved debate on the advantages and disadvantages of using live patients in dental licensure exams. Two contrasting viewpoints are presented. Viewpoint 1 supports the traditional use of live patients, arguing that other assessment models have not yet been demonstrated to be viable alternatives to the actual treatment of patients in the clinical licensure process. This viewpoint also contends that the use of live patients and inherent variances in live patient treatment represent the realities of daily private practice. Viewpoint 2 argues that the use of live patients in licensure exams needs to be discontinued considering those exams' ethical dilemmas of exposing patients to potential harm, as well as their lack of reliability and validity and limited scope. According to this viewpoint, the current presence of viable alternatives means that the risk of harm inherent in live patient exams can finally be eliminated and those exams replaced with other means to confirm that candidates are qualified for licensure to practice.",
keywords = "assessment, clinical examination, clinical licensure, dental education, live patient examination",
author = "Chu, {T.M. Gabriel} and Makhoul, {Nicholas M.} and Silva, {Daniela Rodrigues} and Gonzales, {Theresa S.} and Ariadne Letra and Mays, {Keith A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21815/JDE.018.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "246--251",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should Live Patient Licensing Examinations in Dentistry Be Discontinued? Two Viewpoints

T2 - Viewpoint 1: Alternative Assessment Models Are Not Yet Viable Replacements for Live Patients in Clinical Licensure Exams and Viewpoint 2: Ethical and Patient Care Concerns About Live Patient Exams Require Full Acceptance of Justifiable Alternatives

AU - Chu, T.M. Gabriel

AU - Makhoul, Nicholas M.

AU - Silva, Daniela Rodrigues

AU - Gonzales, Theresa S.

AU - Letra, Ariadne

AU - Mays, Keith A.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This Point/Counterpoint article addresses a long-standing but still-unresolved debate on the advantages and disadvantages of using live patients in dental licensure exams. Two contrasting viewpoints are presented. Viewpoint 1 supports the traditional use of live patients, arguing that other assessment models have not yet been demonstrated to be viable alternatives to the actual treatment of patients in the clinical licensure process. This viewpoint also contends that the use of live patients and inherent variances in live patient treatment represent the realities of daily private practice. Viewpoint 2 argues that the use of live patients in licensure exams needs to be discontinued considering those exams' ethical dilemmas of exposing patients to potential harm, as well as their lack of reliability and validity and limited scope. According to this viewpoint, the current presence of viable alternatives means that the risk of harm inherent in live patient exams can finally be eliminated and those exams replaced with other means to confirm that candidates are qualified for licensure to practice.

AB - This Point/Counterpoint article addresses a long-standing but still-unresolved debate on the advantages and disadvantages of using live patients in dental licensure exams. Two contrasting viewpoints are presented. Viewpoint 1 supports the traditional use of live patients, arguing that other assessment models have not yet been demonstrated to be viable alternatives to the actual treatment of patients in the clinical licensure process. This viewpoint also contends that the use of live patients and inherent variances in live patient treatment represent the realities of daily private practice. Viewpoint 2 argues that the use of live patients in licensure exams needs to be discontinued considering those exams' ethical dilemmas of exposing patients to potential harm, as well as their lack of reliability and validity and limited scope. According to this viewpoint, the current presence of viable alternatives means that the risk of harm inherent in live patient exams can finally be eliminated and those exams replaced with other means to confirm that candidates are qualified for licensure to practice.

KW - assessment

KW - clinical examination

KW - clinical licensure

KW - dental education

KW - live patient examination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043257141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043257141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21815/JDE.018.023

DO - 10.21815/JDE.018.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 29496802

AN - SCOPUS:85043257141

VL - 82

SP - 246

EP - 251

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 3

ER -