Simplified screening of lower extremity arterial bypasses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study assessed a new technique comparing the width of the distal Doppler signal with that of the proximal Doppler signal in order to detect intervening bypass graft or anastomotic stenoses. The width of the Doppler signal was defined as the time from the initial Doppler signal upstroke until the time the signal returned to within 10% of its baseline. The width of the distal Doppler signal was compared with the width of the proximal Doppler signal for 11 normal bypasses and for 11 bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis. The distal Doppler signal was at least 10% wider than the proximal Doppler signal in all bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis, unlike most bypasses without an intervening stenosis (P<0.001). This technique detected all the significant bypass graft stenoses while eliminating the need to do complete bypass graft duplex ultrasound studies on most normal bypasses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-541
Number of pages7
JournalVascular Surgery
Volume31
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Lower Extremity
Pathologic Constriction
Transplants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Simplified screening of lower extremity arterial bypasses. / Sawchuk, Alan.

In: Vascular Surgery, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1997, p. 535-541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccbf7dfe3c574c79aa6395108eedcce6,
title = "Simplified screening of lower extremity arterial bypasses",
abstract = "This study assessed a new technique comparing the width of the distal Doppler signal with that of the proximal Doppler signal in order to detect intervening bypass graft or anastomotic stenoses. The width of the Doppler signal was defined as the time from the initial Doppler signal upstroke until the time the signal returned to within 10{\%} of its baseline. The width of the distal Doppler signal was compared with the width of the proximal Doppler signal for 11 normal bypasses and for 11 bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis. The distal Doppler signal was at least 10{\%} wider than the proximal Doppler signal in all bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis, unlike most bypasses without an intervening stenosis (P<0.001). This technique detected all the significant bypass graft stenoses while eliminating the need to do complete bypass graft duplex ultrasound studies on most normal bypasses.",
author = "Alan Sawchuk",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "535--541",
journal = "Vascular and Endovascular Surgery",
issn = "1538-5744",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simplified screening of lower extremity arterial bypasses

AU - Sawchuk, Alan

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This study assessed a new technique comparing the width of the distal Doppler signal with that of the proximal Doppler signal in order to detect intervening bypass graft or anastomotic stenoses. The width of the Doppler signal was defined as the time from the initial Doppler signal upstroke until the time the signal returned to within 10% of its baseline. The width of the distal Doppler signal was compared with the width of the proximal Doppler signal for 11 normal bypasses and for 11 bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis. The distal Doppler signal was at least 10% wider than the proximal Doppler signal in all bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis, unlike most bypasses without an intervening stenosis (P<0.001). This technique detected all the significant bypass graft stenoses while eliminating the need to do complete bypass graft duplex ultrasound studies on most normal bypasses.

AB - This study assessed a new technique comparing the width of the distal Doppler signal with that of the proximal Doppler signal in order to detect intervening bypass graft or anastomotic stenoses. The width of the Doppler signal was defined as the time from the initial Doppler signal upstroke until the time the signal returned to within 10% of its baseline. The width of the distal Doppler signal was compared with the width of the proximal Doppler signal for 11 normal bypasses and for 11 bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis. The distal Doppler signal was at least 10% wider than the proximal Doppler signal in all bypasses with a significant intervening stenosis, unlike most bypasses without an intervening stenosis (P<0.001). This technique detected all the significant bypass graft stenoses while eliminating the need to do complete bypass graft duplex ultrasound studies on most normal bypasses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030831967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030831967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030831967

VL - 31

SP - 535

EP - 541

JO - Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

JF - Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

SN - 1538-5744

IS - 5

ER -