Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for medicaid-enrolled children

Rocio B. Quiñonez, Sally C. Stearns, Bhavna S. Talekar, R. Gary Rozier, Stephen Downs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application by medical providers when implemented within a well-child periodicity schedule for Medicaid-enrolled children. Design: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using published probabilities and costs. Input parameters included the effectiveness of fluoride varnish (35.4%) applied according to the well-child periodicity schedule up to 3 years of age at $16.00 per application, annual caries increment (14%), age-specific dental care usage rates (0.2% at 9 months to 19% at 42 months), and age-related nonhospital treatment costs ($292.00-$503.00) and hospital treatment costs ($2191.00-$2940.00). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects for varying input parameters. Setting: Well-child visits during primary care. Participants: Children aged 9 to 42 months. Intervention: Application of universal fluoride varnish (fluoride varnish-all) at 9, 18, 24, and 36 months vs no intervention (fluoride varnish-none) was compared. Main Outcome Measures: Cost per month without cavities and treatment averted during the first 42 months of life from a Medicaid payer's perspective. Results: Fluoride varnish improved clinical outcomes by 1.52 cavity-free months but at a cost of $7.18 for each cavity-free month gained per child and $203 for each treatment averted. Considerable uncertainty existed for some parameters. Fluoride varnish was cost saving when dental services and nonhospital treatment costs were 1.5 to 2 times greater, respectively, than our base case estimate. Conclusions: Based on these assumptions, fluoride varnish use in the medical setting is effective in reducing early childhood caries in low-income populations but is not cost saving in the first 42 months of life. Potential total cost reductions with varying parameters suggest that evaluations using a longitudinal cohort are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-170
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume160
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Topical Fluorides
Medicaid
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Care Costs
Periodicity
Appointments and Schedules
Dental Care
Hospital Costs
Poverty
Uncertainty
Primary Health Care
Tooth
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for medicaid-enrolled children. / Quiñonez, Rocio B.; Stearns, Sally C.; Talekar, Bhavna S.; Rozier, R. Gary; Downs, Stephen.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 160, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 164-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quiñonez, Rocio B. ; Stearns, Sally C. ; Talekar, Bhavna S. ; Rozier, R. Gary ; Downs, Stephen. / Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for medicaid-enrolled children. In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 160, No. 2. pp. 164-170.
@article{ca68f185f3c4412ebad19c143ed6b33e,
title = "Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for medicaid-enrolled children",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application by medical providers when implemented within a well-child periodicity schedule for Medicaid-enrolled children. Design: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using published probabilities and costs. Input parameters included the effectiveness of fluoride varnish (35.4{\%}) applied according to the well-child periodicity schedule up to 3 years of age at $16.00 per application, annual caries increment (14{\%}), age-specific dental care usage rates (0.2{\%} at 9 months to 19{\%} at 42 months), and age-related nonhospital treatment costs ($292.00-$503.00) and hospital treatment costs ($2191.00-$2940.00). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects for varying input parameters. Setting: Well-child visits during primary care. Participants: Children aged 9 to 42 months. Intervention: Application of universal fluoride varnish (fluoride varnish-all) at 9, 18, 24, and 36 months vs no intervention (fluoride varnish-none) was compared. Main Outcome Measures: Cost per month without cavities and treatment averted during the first 42 months of life from a Medicaid payer's perspective. Results: Fluoride varnish improved clinical outcomes by 1.52 cavity-free months but at a cost of $7.18 for each cavity-free month gained per child and $203 for each treatment averted. Considerable uncertainty existed for some parameters. Fluoride varnish was cost saving when dental services and nonhospital treatment costs were 1.5 to 2 times greater, respectively, than our base case estimate. Conclusions: Based on these assumptions, fluoride varnish use in the medical setting is effective in reducing early childhood caries in low-income populations but is not cost saving in the first 42 months of life. Potential total cost reductions with varying parameters suggest that evaluations using a longitudinal cohort are needed.",
author = "Qui{\~n}onez, {Rocio B.} and Stearns, {Sally C.} and Talekar, {Bhavna S.} and Rozier, {R. Gary} and Stephen Downs",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.160.2.164",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "164--170",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for medicaid-enrolled children

AU - Quiñonez, Rocio B.

AU - Stearns, Sally C.

AU - Talekar, Bhavna S.

AU - Rozier, R. Gary

AU - Downs, Stephen

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application by medical providers when implemented within a well-child periodicity schedule for Medicaid-enrolled children. Design: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using published probabilities and costs. Input parameters included the effectiveness of fluoride varnish (35.4%) applied according to the well-child periodicity schedule up to 3 years of age at $16.00 per application, annual caries increment (14%), age-specific dental care usage rates (0.2% at 9 months to 19% at 42 months), and age-related nonhospital treatment costs ($292.00-$503.00) and hospital treatment costs ($2191.00-$2940.00). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects for varying input parameters. Setting: Well-child visits during primary care. Participants: Children aged 9 to 42 months. Intervention: Application of universal fluoride varnish (fluoride varnish-all) at 9, 18, 24, and 36 months vs no intervention (fluoride varnish-none) was compared. Main Outcome Measures: Cost per month without cavities and treatment averted during the first 42 months of life from a Medicaid payer's perspective. Results: Fluoride varnish improved clinical outcomes by 1.52 cavity-free months but at a cost of $7.18 for each cavity-free month gained per child and $203 for each treatment averted. Considerable uncertainty existed for some parameters. Fluoride varnish was cost saving when dental services and nonhospital treatment costs were 1.5 to 2 times greater, respectively, than our base case estimate. Conclusions: Based on these assumptions, fluoride varnish use in the medical setting is effective in reducing early childhood caries in low-income populations but is not cost saving in the first 42 months of life. Potential total cost reductions with varying parameters suggest that evaluations using a longitudinal cohort are needed.

AB - Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application by medical providers when implemented within a well-child periodicity schedule for Medicaid-enrolled children. Design: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using published probabilities and costs. Input parameters included the effectiveness of fluoride varnish (35.4%) applied according to the well-child periodicity schedule up to 3 years of age at $16.00 per application, annual caries increment (14%), age-specific dental care usage rates (0.2% at 9 months to 19% at 42 months), and age-related nonhospital treatment costs ($292.00-$503.00) and hospital treatment costs ($2191.00-$2940.00). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects for varying input parameters. Setting: Well-child visits during primary care. Participants: Children aged 9 to 42 months. Intervention: Application of universal fluoride varnish (fluoride varnish-all) at 9, 18, 24, and 36 months vs no intervention (fluoride varnish-none) was compared. Main Outcome Measures: Cost per month without cavities and treatment averted during the first 42 months of life from a Medicaid payer's perspective. Results: Fluoride varnish improved clinical outcomes by 1.52 cavity-free months but at a cost of $7.18 for each cavity-free month gained per child and $203 for each treatment averted. Considerable uncertainty existed for some parameters. Fluoride varnish was cost saving when dental services and nonhospital treatment costs were 1.5 to 2 times greater, respectively, than our base case estimate. Conclusions: Based on these assumptions, fluoride varnish use in the medical setting is effective in reducing early childhood caries in low-income populations but is not cost saving in the first 42 months of life. Potential total cost reductions with varying parameters suggest that evaluations using a longitudinal cohort are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32244437444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32244437444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.164

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.160.2.164

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 164

EP - 170

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 2

ER -