Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

A safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy

Joshua A. Waters, Michael J. Guzman, Alyssa D. Fajardo, Don Selzer, Eric A. Wiebke, Bruce Robb, Virgilio V. George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery has evolved from an effort to minimize tissue trauma, limit morbidity, and maximize cosmesis. Limited data exist comparing single-port with conventional laparoscopy for right colectomy. Our aim is to compare single-port with laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and feasibility. We assert that this approach can be adopted in a safe and efficacious manner while using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data regarding 16 single-port and 27 conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and February 2009. Demographics, operative outcomes, and morbidity were included and analyzed using either Student t test or Fisher exact probability test. RESULTS: Single-port and conventional laparoscopic groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and co-morbidity. Seventy-five percent and 70% of the operations were performed for malignancy in the single-port and the conventional laparoscopy group, respectively (P = .69). Operative duration was 106 minutes in the single-port group vs 100 minutes in the conventional group (P = .64). Blood loss was 54 mL and 90 mL, respectively (P = .07). No conversions or additions of ports occurred. Hospital stay was 5.3 days in the single-port group vs 6 days in the conventional group (P = .53). Margins were negative in both groups. Mean lymph node number was 18 and 16 nodes (P = .92). There was one death in the conventional group (P = .44). Morbidity including wound infection was 18.8% and 14.9%, respectively (P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support single-port right colectomy as a safe and efficacious approach to right colon resections in patients eligible for laparoscopy with minimal additional equipment or learning curve for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons. The single port was undertaken without an increase in morbidity or mortality. There was no increase in operative time with use of the single-port approach. Finally, adequate lymph node harvest and margin clearance was maintained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1467-1472
Number of pages6
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume53
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Laparoscopy
Colectomy
Morbidity
Lymph Nodes
Learning Curve
Wound Infection
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Colon
Body Mass Index
Demography
Students
Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Neoplasms
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Colon and rectal surgery
  • Colon cancer
  • Laparoscopy
  • Outcomes research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy : A safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. / Waters, Joshua A.; Guzman, Michael J.; Fajardo, Alyssa D.; Selzer, Don; Wiebke, Eric A.; Robb, Bruce; George, Virgilio V.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 53, No. 11, 11.2010, p. 1467-1472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waters, Joshua A. ; Guzman, Michael J. ; Fajardo, Alyssa D. ; Selzer, Don ; Wiebke, Eric A. ; Robb, Bruce ; George, Virgilio V. / Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy : A safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2010 ; Vol. 53, No. 11. pp. 1467-1472.
@article{87f5be58ccb84c1b9203e73274251573,
title = "Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: A safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery has evolved from an effort to minimize tissue trauma, limit morbidity, and maximize cosmesis. Limited data exist comparing single-port with conventional laparoscopy for right colectomy. Our aim is to compare single-port with laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and feasibility. We assert that this approach can be adopted in a safe and efficacious manner while using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data regarding 16 single-port and 27 conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and February 2009. Demographics, operative outcomes, and morbidity were included and analyzed using either Student t test or Fisher exact probability test. RESULTS: Single-port and conventional laparoscopic groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and co-morbidity. Seventy-five percent and 70{\%} of the operations were performed for malignancy in the single-port and the conventional laparoscopy group, respectively (P = .69). Operative duration was 106 minutes in the single-port group vs 100 minutes in the conventional group (P = .64). Blood loss was 54 mL and 90 mL, respectively (P = .07). No conversions or additions of ports occurred. Hospital stay was 5.3 days in the single-port group vs 6 days in the conventional group (P = .53). Margins were negative in both groups. Mean lymph node number was 18 and 16 nodes (P = .92). There was one death in the conventional group (P = .44). Morbidity including wound infection was 18.8{\%} and 14.9{\%}, respectively (P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support single-port right colectomy as a safe and efficacious approach to right colon resections in patients eligible for laparoscopy with minimal additional equipment or learning curve for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons. The single port was undertaken without an increase in morbidity or mortality. There was no increase in operative time with use of the single-port approach. Finally, adequate lymph node harvest and margin clearance was maintained.",
keywords = "Colon and rectal surgery, Colon cancer, Laparoscopy, Outcomes research",
author = "Waters, {Joshua A.} and Guzman, {Michael J.} and Fajardo, {Alyssa D.} and Don Selzer and Wiebke, {Eric A.} and Bruce Robb and George, {Virgilio V.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f23ca0",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1467--1472",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

T2 - A safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy

AU - Waters, Joshua A.

AU - Guzman, Michael J.

AU - Fajardo, Alyssa D.

AU - Selzer, Don

AU - Wiebke, Eric A.

AU - Robb, Bruce

AU - George, Virgilio V.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery has evolved from an effort to minimize tissue trauma, limit morbidity, and maximize cosmesis. Limited data exist comparing single-port with conventional laparoscopy for right colectomy. Our aim is to compare single-port with laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and feasibility. We assert that this approach can be adopted in a safe and efficacious manner while using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data regarding 16 single-port and 27 conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and February 2009. Demographics, operative outcomes, and morbidity were included and analyzed using either Student t test or Fisher exact probability test. RESULTS: Single-port and conventional laparoscopic groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and co-morbidity. Seventy-five percent and 70% of the operations were performed for malignancy in the single-port and the conventional laparoscopy group, respectively (P = .69). Operative duration was 106 minutes in the single-port group vs 100 minutes in the conventional group (P = .64). Blood loss was 54 mL and 90 mL, respectively (P = .07). No conversions or additions of ports occurred. Hospital stay was 5.3 days in the single-port group vs 6 days in the conventional group (P = .53). Margins were negative in both groups. Mean lymph node number was 18 and 16 nodes (P = .92). There was one death in the conventional group (P = .44). Morbidity including wound infection was 18.8% and 14.9%, respectively (P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support single-port right colectomy as a safe and efficacious approach to right colon resections in patients eligible for laparoscopy with minimal additional equipment or learning curve for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons. The single port was undertaken without an increase in morbidity or mortality. There was no increase in operative time with use of the single-port approach. Finally, adequate lymph node harvest and margin clearance was maintained.

AB - PURPOSE: Single-port laparoscopic surgery has evolved from an effort to minimize tissue trauma, limit morbidity, and maximize cosmesis. Limited data exist comparing single-port with conventional laparoscopy for right colectomy. Our aim is to compare single-port with laparoscopic colectomy with regard to safety and feasibility. We assert that this approach can be adopted in a safe and efficacious manner while using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data regarding 16 single-port and 27 conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed by a single surgeon between January 2008 and February 2009. Demographics, operative outcomes, and morbidity were included and analyzed using either Student t test or Fisher exact probability test. RESULTS: Single-port and conventional laparoscopic groups were similar with regard to age, gender, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and co-morbidity. Seventy-five percent and 70% of the operations were performed for malignancy in the single-port and the conventional laparoscopy group, respectively (P = .69). Operative duration was 106 minutes in the single-port group vs 100 minutes in the conventional group (P = .64). Blood loss was 54 mL and 90 mL, respectively (P = .07). No conversions or additions of ports occurred. Hospital stay was 5.3 days in the single-port group vs 6 days in the conventional group (P = .53). Margins were negative in both groups. Mean lymph node number was 18 and 16 nodes (P = .92). There was one death in the conventional group (P = .44). Morbidity including wound infection was 18.8% and 14.9%, respectively (P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support single-port right colectomy as a safe and efficacious approach to right colon resections in patients eligible for laparoscopy with minimal additional equipment or learning curve for experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons. The single port was undertaken without an increase in morbidity or mortality. There was no increase in operative time with use of the single-port approach. Finally, adequate lymph node harvest and margin clearance was maintained.

KW - Colon and rectal surgery

KW - Colon cancer

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Outcomes research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349236904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78349236904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f23ca0

DO - 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f23ca0

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1467

EP - 1472

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 11

ER -