Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance

Guangyan Li, James Williams, Yuri A. Pishchalnikov, Ziyue Liu, James A. McAteer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE • To determine how the size and location of coupling defects caught between the therapy head of a lithotripter and the skin of a surrogate patient (i.e. the acoustic window of a test chamber) affect the features of shock waves responsible for stone breakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS • Model defects were placed in the coupling gel between the therapy head of a Dornier Compact-S electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier MedTech, Kennesaw, GA, USA) and the Mylar (biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate) (DuPont Teijin Films, Chester, VA, USA) window of a water-filled coupling test system. • A fibre-optic probe hydrophone was used to measure acoustic pressures and map the lateral dimensions of the focal zone of the lithotripter. • The effect of coupling conditions on stone breakage was assessed using gypsum model stones. RESULTS • Stone breakage decreased in proportion to the area of the coupling defect; a centrally located defect blocking only 18% of the transmission area reduced stone breakage by an average of almost 30%. • The effect on stone breakage was greater for defects located on-axis and decreased as the defect was moved laterally; an 18% defect located near the periphery of the coupling window (2.0 cm off-axis) reduced stone breakage by only 15% compared to when coupling was completely unobstructed. • Defects centred within the coupling window acted to narrow the focal width of the lithotripter; an 8.2% defect reduced the focal width 30% compared to no obstruction (4.4 mm vs 6.5 mm). • Coupling defects located slightly off centre disrupted the symmetry of the acoustic field; an 18% defect positioned 1.0 cm off-axis shifted the focus of maximum positive pressure 1.0 mm laterally. • Defects on and off-axis imposed a significant reduction in the energy density of shock waves across the focal zone. CONCLUSIONS • In addition to blocking the transmission of shock-wave energy, coupling defects also disrupt the properties of shock waves that play a role in stone breakage, including the focal width of the lithotripter and the symmetry of the acoustic field • The effect is dependent on the size and location of defects, with defects near the centre of the coupling window having the greatest effect. • These data emphasize the importance of eliminating air pockets from the coupling interface, particularly defects located near the centre of the coupling window.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBJU International
Volume110
Issue number11 C
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Head
Pressure
Myelinated Nerve Fibers
Calcium Sulfate
Polyethylene Terephthalates
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Shock
Gels
Air
Skin
Water
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Acoustic coupling
  • Shock-wave lithotripsy
  • Stone breakage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance. / Li, Guangyan; Williams, James; Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.; Liu, Ziyue; McAteer, James A.

In: BJU International, Vol. 110, No. 11 C, 12.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Guangyan ; Williams, James ; Pishchalnikov, Yuri A. ; Liu, Ziyue ; McAteer, James A. / Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance. In: BJU International. 2012 ; Vol. 110, No. 11 C.
@article{fcb14994ca114052955c478c12305f4a,
title = "Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE • To determine how the size and location of coupling defects caught between the therapy head of a lithotripter and the skin of a surrogate patient (i.e. the acoustic window of a test chamber) affect the features of shock waves responsible for stone breakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS • Model defects were placed in the coupling gel between the therapy head of a Dornier Compact-S electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier MedTech, Kennesaw, GA, USA) and the Mylar (biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate) (DuPont Teijin Films, Chester, VA, USA) window of a water-filled coupling test system. • A fibre-optic probe hydrophone was used to measure acoustic pressures and map the lateral dimensions of the focal zone of the lithotripter. • The effect of coupling conditions on stone breakage was assessed using gypsum model stones. RESULTS • Stone breakage decreased in proportion to the area of the coupling defect; a centrally located defect blocking only 18{\%} of the transmission area reduced stone breakage by an average of almost 30{\%}. • The effect on stone breakage was greater for defects located on-axis and decreased as the defect was moved laterally; an 18{\%} defect located near the periphery of the coupling window (2.0 cm off-axis) reduced stone breakage by only 15{\%} compared to when coupling was completely unobstructed. • Defects centred within the coupling window acted to narrow the focal width of the lithotripter; an 8.2{\%} defect reduced the focal width 30{\%} compared to no obstruction (4.4 mm vs 6.5 mm). • Coupling defects located slightly off centre disrupted the symmetry of the acoustic field; an 18{\%} defect positioned 1.0 cm off-axis shifted the focus of maximum positive pressure 1.0 mm laterally. • Defects on and off-axis imposed a significant reduction in the energy density of shock waves across the focal zone. CONCLUSIONS • In addition to blocking the transmission of shock-wave energy, coupling defects also disrupt the properties of shock waves that play a role in stone breakage, including the focal width of the lithotripter and the symmetry of the acoustic field • The effect is dependent on the size and location of defects, with defects near the centre of the coupling window having the greatest effect. • These data emphasize the importance of eliminating air pockets from the coupling interface, particularly defects located near the centre of the coupling window.",
keywords = "Acoustic coupling, Shock-wave lithotripsy, Stone breakage",
author = "Guangyan Li and James Williams and Pishchalnikov, {Yuri A.} and Ziyue Liu and McAteer, {James A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11382.x",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11 C",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance

AU - Li, Guangyan

AU - Williams, James

AU - Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.

AU - Liu, Ziyue

AU - McAteer, James A.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE • To determine how the size and location of coupling defects caught between the therapy head of a lithotripter and the skin of a surrogate patient (i.e. the acoustic window of a test chamber) affect the features of shock waves responsible for stone breakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS • Model defects were placed in the coupling gel between the therapy head of a Dornier Compact-S electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier MedTech, Kennesaw, GA, USA) and the Mylar (biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate) (DuPont Teijin Films, Chester, VA, USA) window of a water-filled coupling test system. • A fibre-optic probe hydrophone was used to measure acoustic pressures and map the lateral dimensions of the focal zone of the lithotripter. • The effect of coupling conditions on stone breakage was assessed using gypsum model stones. RESULTS • Stone breakage decreased in proportion to the area of the coupling defect; a centrally located defect blocking only 18% of the transmission area reduced stone breakage by an average of almost 30%. • The effect on stone breakage was greater for defects located on-axis and decreased as the defect was moved laterally; an 18% defect located near the periphery of the coupling window (2.0 cm off-axis) reduced stone breakage by only 15% compared to when coupling was completely unobstructed. • Defects centred within the coupling window acted to narrow the focal width of the lithotripter; an 8.2% defect reduced the focal width 30% compared to no obstruction (4.4 mm vs 6.5 mm). • Coupling defects located slightly off centre disrupted the symmetry of the acoustic field; an 18% defect positioned 1.0 cm off-axis shifted the focus of maximum positive pressure 1.0 mm laterally. • Defects on and off-axis imposed a significant reduction in the energy density of shock waves across the focal zone. CONCLUSIONS • In addition to blocking the transmission of shock-wave energy, coupling defects also disrupt the properties of shock waves that play a role in stone breakage, including the focal width of the lithotripter and the symmetry of the acoustic field • The effect is dependent on the size and location of defects, with defects near the centre of the coupling window having the greatest effect. • These data emphasize the importance of eliminating air pockets from the coupling interface, particularly defects located near the centre of the coupling window.

AB - OBJECTIVE • To determine how the size and location of coupling defects caught between the therapy head of a lithotripter and the skin of a surrogate patient (i.e. the acoustic window of a test chamber) affect the features of shock waves responsible for stone breakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS • Model defects were placed in the coupling gel between the therapy head of a Dornier Compact-S electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier MedTech, Kennesaw, GA, USA) and the Mylar (biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate) (DuPont Teijin Films, Chester, VA, USA) window of a water-filled coupling test system. • A fibre-optic probe hydrophone was used to measure acoustic pressures and map the lateral dimensions of the focal zone of the lithotripter. • The effect of coupling conditions on stone breakage was assessed using gypsum model stones. RESULTS • Stone breakage decreased in proportion to the area of the coupling defect; a centrally located defect blocking only 18% of the transmission area reduced stone breakage by an average of almost 30%. • The effect on stone breakage was greater for defects located on-axis and decreased as the defect was moved laterally; an 18% defect located near the periphery of the coupling window (2.0 cm off-axis) reduced stone breakage by only 15% compared to when coupling was completely unobstructed. • Defects centred within the coupling window acted to narrow the focal width of the lithotripter; an 8.2% defect reduced the focal width 30% compared to no obstruction (4.4 mm vs 6.5 mm). • Coupling defects located slightly off centre disrupted the symmetry of the acoustic field; an 18% defect positioned 1.0 cm off-axis shifted the focus of maximum positive pressure 1.0 mm laterally. • Defects on and off-axis imposed a significant reduction in the energy density of shock waves across the focal zone. CONCLUSIONS • In addition to blocking the transmission of shock-wave energy, coupling defects also disrupt the properties of shock waves that play a role in stone breakage, including the focal width of the lithotripter and the symmetry of the acoustic field • The effect is dependent on the size and location of defects, with defects near the centre of the coupling window having the greatest effect. • These data emphasize the importance of eliminating air pockets from the coupling interface, particularly defects located near the centre of the coupling window.

KW - Acoustic coupling

KW - Shock-wave lithotripsy

KW - Stone breakage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873262407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873262407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11382.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11382.x

M3 - Article

VL - 110

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 11 C

ER -