Small tumors as risk factors not disease

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I argue that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the tumor most commonly diagnosed by breast mammography, cannot be confidently classified as cancer, that is, as pathological. This is because there may not be dysfunction present in DCIS—as I argue based on its high prevalence and the small amount of risk it conveys—and thus DCIS may not count as a disease by dysfunction-requiring approaches, such as Boorse’s biostatistical theory and Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction account. Patients should decide about treatment for DCIS based on the risks it poses and the risks and benefits of treatment, not on its disease status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)986-998
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

In Situ
Risk Factors
Cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • History

Cite this

Small tumors as risk factors not disease. / Schwartz, Peter.

In: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 81, No. 5, 2014, p. 986-998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f02ebbee4490410c930618510689d309,
title = "Small tumors as risk factors not disease",
abstract = "I argue that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the tumor most commonly diagnosed by breast mammography, cannot be confidently classified as cancer, that is, as pathological. This is because there may not be dysfunction present in DCIS—as I argue based on its high prevalence and the small amount of risk it conveys—and thus DCIS may not count as a disease by dysfunction-requiring approaches, such as Boorse’s biostatistical theory and Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction account. Patients should decide about treatment for DCIS based on the risks it poses and the risks and benefits of treatment, not on its disease status.",
author = "Peter Schwartz",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1086/678280",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "986--998",
journal = "Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0031-8248",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Small tumors as risk factors not disease

AU - Schwartz, Peter

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - I argue that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the tumor most commonly diagnosed by breast mammography, cannot be confidently classified as cancer, that is, as pathological. This is because there may not be dysfunction present in DCIS—as I argue based on its high prevalence and the small amount of risk it conveys—and thus DCIS may not count as a disease by dysfunction-requiring approaches, such as Boorse’s biostatistical theory and Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction account. Patients should decide about treatment for DCIS based on the risks it poses and the risks and benefits of treatment, not on its disease status.

AB - I argue that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the tumor most commonly diagnosed by breast mammography, cannot be confidently classified as cancer, that is, as pathological. This is because there may not be dysfunction present in DCIS—as I argue based on its high prevalence and the small amount of risk it conveys—and thus DCIS may not count as a disease by dysfunction-requiring approaches, such as Boorse’s biostatistical theory and Wakefield’s harmful dysfunction account. Patients should decide about treatment for DCIS based on the risks it poses and the risks and benefits of treatment, not on its disease status.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912544431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912544431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/678280

DO - 10.1086/678280

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 986

EP - 998

JO - Philosophy of Science

JF - Philosophy of Science

SN - 0031-8248

IS - 5

ER -