Snapshot of a Specialty: Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis

Paul E. Wallner, Anna M. McGeagh, Anthony M. Gerdeman, Lynn D. Wilson, Dennis C. Shrieve, Kaled M. Alektiar, Stephen M. Hahn, Lisa A. Kachnic, Valerie Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Beginning in 2010, the ABR has administered triennial clinical practice analysis surveys to inform examination development volunteers and staff about the actual state of radiation oncology practice. Methods and Materials: As reported here, the 2016 survey was designed to provide objective data regarding actual patient volumes of specific disease sites and subjective insight as to the importance and relevance of site-specific therapy to individual practices. Results: The survey instrument was circulated to 4,075 radiation oncologists listed in the membership database of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and responses were received from 690 (16.9%); a total of 287 (41.5%) self-identified as being in academic practice. Even in the academic setting, a majority (216 of 287, or 75.3%) indicated that they spend most of their time in clinical practice. Conclusions: Data from the survey are informative regarding changes in the practice of radiation oncology over the past 6 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Staff Development
Volunteers
Databases
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • ABR
  • clinical practice analysis
  • radiation oncology practice
  • snapshot of radiation oncology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Snapshot of a Specialty : Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis. / Wallner, Paul E.; McGeagh, Anna M.; Gerdeman, Anthony M.; Wilson, Lynn D.; Shrieve, Dennis C.; Alektiar, Kaled M.; Hahn, Stephen M.; Kachnic, Lisa A.; Jackson, Valerie.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wallner, Paul E. ; McGeagh, Anna M. ; Gerdeman, Anthony M. ; Wilson, Lynn D. ; Shrieve, Dennis C. ; Alektiar, Kaled M. ; Hahn, Stephen M. ; Kachnic, Lisa A. ; Jackson, Valerie. / Snapshot of a Specialty : Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018.
@article{d35edbde920a4f0f8eab6a726d4943d9,
title = "Snapshot of a Specialty: Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: Beginning in 2010, the ABR has administered triennial clinical practice analysis surveys to inform examination development volunteers and staff about the actual state of radiation oncology practice. Methods and Materials: As reported here, the 2016 survey was designed to provide objective data regarding actual patient volumes of specific disease sites and subjective insight as to the importance and relevance of site-specific therapy to individual practices. Results: The survey instrument was circulated to 4,075 radiation oncologists listed in the membership database of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and responses were received from 690 (16.9{\%}); a total of 287 (41.5{\%}) self-identified as being in academic practice. Even in the academic setting, a majority (216 of 287, or 75.3{\%}) indicated that they spend most of their time in clinical practice. Conclusions: Data from the survey are informative regarding changes in the practice of radiation oncology over the past 6 years.",
keywords = "ABR, clinical practice analysis, radiation oncology practice, snapshot of radiation oncology",
author = "Wallner, {Paul E.} and McGeagh, {Anna M.} and Gerdeman, {Anthony M.} and Wilson, {Lynn D.} and Shrieve, {Dennis C.} and Alektiar, {Kaled M.} and Hahn, {Stephen M.} and Kachnic, {Lisa A.} and Valerie Jackson",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.002",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Snapshot of a Specialty

T2 - Results of the ABR 2016 Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice Analysis

AU - Wallner, Paul E.

AU - McGeagh, Anna M.

AU - Gerdeman, Anthony M.

AU - Wilson, Lynn D.

AU - Shrieve, Dennis C.

AU - Alektiar, Kaled M.

AU - Hahn, Stephen M.

AU - Kachnic, Lisa A.

AU - Jackson, Valerie

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Beginning in 2010, the ABR has administered triennial clinical practice analysis surveys to inform examination development volunteers and staff about the actual state of radiation oncology practice. Methods and Materials: As reported here, the 2016 survey was designed to provide objective data regarding actual patient volumes of specific disease sites and subjective insight as to the importance and relevance of site-specific therapy to individual practices. Results: The survey instrument was circulated to 4,075 radiation oncologists listed in the membership database of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and responses were received from 690 (16.9%); a total of 287 (41.5%) self-identified as being in academic practice. Even in the academic setting, a majority (216 of 287, or 75.3%) indicated that they spend most of their time in clinical practice. Conclusions: Data from the survey are informative regarding changes in the practice of radiation oncology over the past 6 years.

AB - Purpose: Beginning in 2010, the ABR has administered triennial clinical practice analysis surveys to inform examination development volunteers and staff about the actual state of radiation oncology practice. Methods and Materials: As reported here, the 2016 survey was designed to provide objective data regarding actual patient volumes of specific disease sites and subjective insight as to the importance and relevance of site-specific therapy to individual practices. Results: The survey instrument was circulated to 4,075 radiation oncologists listed in the membership database of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and responses were received from 690 (16.9%); a total of 287 (41.5%) self-identified as being in academic practice. Even in the academic setting, a majority (216 of 287, or 75.3%) indicated that they spend most of their time in clinical practice. Conclusions: Data from the survey are informative regarding changes in the practice of radiation oncology over the past 6 years.

KW - ABR

KW - clinical practice analysis

KW - radiation oncology practice

KW - snapshot of radiation oncology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058797832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058797832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 30584037

AN - SCOPUS:85058797832

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

ER -