Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions

Are there racial/ethnic differences?

Lee A. Learman, Miriam Kuppermann, Elena Gates, Robert F. Nease, Virginia Gildengorin, A. Eugene Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R2 values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-26
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics - Seminars in Medical Genetics
Volume119 C
Issue number1
StatePublished - May 15 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetic Testing
Ethnic Groups
Down Syndrome
Marital Status
Social Class
Pregnant Women
Cross-Sectional Studies
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Down syndrome
  • Faith/religion
  • Family influence
  • Health beliefs
  • Individual differences
  • Interpersonal influence
  • Prenatal genetic testing
  • Racial/ethnic differences
  • Social influence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Learman, L. A., Kuppermann, M., Gates, E., Nease, R. F., Gildengorin, V., & Washington, A. E. (2003). Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: Are there racial/ethnic differences? American Journal of Medical Genetics - Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119 C(1), 19-26.

Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions : Are there racial/ethnic differences? / Learman, Lee A.; Kuppermann, Miriam; Gates, Elena; Nease, Robert F.; Gildengorin, Virginia; Washington, A. Eugene.

In: American Journal of Medical Genetics - Seminars in Medical Genetics, Vol. 119 C, No. 1, 15.05.2003, p. 19-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Learman, LA, Kuppermann, M, Gates, E, Nease, RF, Gildengorin, V & Washington, AE 2003, 'Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: Are there racial/ethnic differences?', American Journal of Medical Genetics - Seminars in Medical Genetics, vol. 119 C, no. 1, pp. 19-26.
Learman, Lee A. ; Kuppermann, Miriam ; Gates, Elena ; Nease, Robert F. ; Gildengorin, Virginia ; Washington, A. Eugene. / Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions : Are there racial/ethnic differences?. In: American Journal of Medical Genetics - Seminars in Medical Genetics. 2003 ; Vol. 119 C, No. 1. pp. 19-26.
@article{49c31b9dc9134d6fb094322813fce70a,
title = "Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: Are there racial/ethnic differences?",
abstract = "The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R2 values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Down syndrome, Faith/religion, Family influence, Health beliefs, Individual differences, Interpersonal influence, Prenatal genetic testing, Racial/ethnic differences, Social influence",
author = "Learman, {Lee A.} and Miriam Kuppermann and Elena Gates and Nease, {Robert F.} and Virginia Gildengorin and Washington, {A. Eugene}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119 C",
pages = "19--26",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics",
issn = "1552-4825",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions

T2 - Are there racial/ethnic differences?

AU - Learman, Lee A.

AU - Kuppermann, Miriam

AU - Gates, Elena

AU - Nease, Robert F.

AU - Gildengorin, Virginia

AU - Washington, A. Eugene

PY - 2003/5/15

Y1 - 2003/5/15

N2 - The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R2 values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions.

AB - The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R2 values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Down syndrome

KW - Faith/religion

KW - Family influence

KW - Health beliefs

KW - Individual differences

KW - Interpersonal influence

KW - Prenatal genetic testing

KW - Racial/ethnic differences

KW - Social influence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042820300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042820300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 119 C

SP - 19

EP - 26

JO - American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics

JF - American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics

SN - 1552-4825

IS - 1

ER -