Solid pattern yolk sac tumor: A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 52 cases

Chia Sui Kao, Muhammad T. Idrees, Robert H. Young, Thomas M. Ulbright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Yolk sac tumors may exhibit numerous patterns. One that has received little attention overall, yet is not uncommon, is a solid pattern, which is especially prone to misinterpretation, usually as seminoma, in biopsy specimens from metastatic or mediastinal sites. This distinction is of critical importance as the 2 tumors are treated differently. To determine features useful in the diagnosis of solid yolk sac tumor we reviewed 52 germ cell tumors (28 testicular primaries, 21 metastases from the testis, and 3 mediastinal primaries) that had a yolk sac tumor component with foci of solid growth, defined as a sheet-like arrangement of tumor cells occupying >2 mm2 and with no or only rare microcysts. Solid yolk sac tumor was almost always associated with other patterns, most commonly microcystic/reticular (75%), glandular (35%), and myxoid (25%). The solid foci consisted of sheets of cells with usually abundant cytoplasm that was mostly (85%) pale to clear and frequently had intercellular basement membrane deposits (75%), rare microcysts (67%), significant nuclear pleomorphism (65%), and hyaline globules (65%). In 2 cases (4%), the cells were small with scant cytoplasm (blastema-like variant). A myxoid background (39%), lymphocytic infiltrate (17%), and an appliqué pattern (8%) were sometimes observed. On immunostaining, AE1/AE3 cytokeratin and glypican 3 provided the most intense and diffuse reactivity for solid yolk sac tumor, whereas α-fetoprotein was negative in 38%. CD117 stained 59%, whereas only rare cells in 1 case (3%) were weakly reactive for podoplanin; OCT3/4 was uniformly negative. We conclude that solid yolk sac tumor can generally be recognized by careful morphologic evaluation, especially its association with other yolk sac tumor patterns, the presence of intercellular band-like deposits of basement membrane, occasional microcysts, nuclear pleomorphism, intracellular hyaline globules, and usual absence of lymphocytes. In difficult cases a concise immunohistochemical panel consisting of AE1/AE3, glypican 3, and OCT3/4 distinguishes solid yolk sac tumor from other neoplasms. α-fetoprotein stains are commonly negative or weak and focal in solid yolk sac tumor and cannot be solely relied on for diagnosis. Common CD117 positivity in solid pattern yolk sac tumors makes it an unreliable discriminator between yolk sac tumor and seminoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-367
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Endodermal Sinus Tumor
Glypicans
Fetal Proteins
Seminoma
Hyalin
Basement Membrane
Cytoplasm
Keratin-3
Neoplasms
Testis
Coloring Agents

Keywords

  • mediastinum
  • solid pattern
  • testis
  • yolk sac tumor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Solid pattern yolk sac tumor : A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 52 cases. / Kao, Chia Sui; Idrees, Muhammad T.; Young, Robert H.; Ulbright, Thomas M.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 360-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3aa86c496ea041118fdda4ca92634f6d,
title = "Solid pattern yolk sac tumor: A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 52 cases",
abstract = "Yolk sac tumors may exhibit numerous patterns. One that has received little attention overall, yet is not uncommon, is a solid pattern, which is especially prone to misinterpretation, usually as seminoma, in biopsy specimens from metastatic or mediastinal sites. This distinction is of critical importance as the 2 tumors are treated differently. To determine features useful in the diagnosis of solid yolk sac tumor we reviewed 52 germ cell tumors (28 testicular primaries, 21 metastases from the testis, and 3 mediastinal primaries) that had a yolk sac tumor component with foci of solid growth, defined as a sheet-like arrangement of tumor cells occupying >2 mm2 and with no or only rare microcysts. Solid yolk sac tumor was almost always associated with other patterns, most commonly microcystic/reticular (75{\%}), glandular (35{\%}), and myxoid (25{\%}). The solid foci consisted of sheets of cells with usually abundant cytoplasm that was mostly (85{\%}) pale to clear and frequently had intercellular basement membrane deposits (75{\%}), rare microcysts (67{\%}), significant nuclear pleomorphism (65{\%}), and hyaline globules (65{\%}). In 2 cases (4{\%}), the cells were small with scant cytoplasm (blastema-like variant). A myxoid background (39{\%}), lymphocytic infiltrate (17{\%}), and an appliqu{\'e} pattern (8{\%}) were sometimes observed. On immunostaining, AE1/AE3 cytokeratin and glypican 3 provided the most intense and diffuse reactivity for solid yolk sac tumor, whereas α-fetoprotein was negative in 38{\%}. CD117 stained 59{\%}, whereas only rare cells in 1 case (3{\%}) were weakly reactive for podoplanin; OCT3/4 was uniformly negative. We conclude that solid yolk sac tumor can generally be recognized by careful morphologic evaluation, especially its association with other yolk sac tumor patterns, the presence of intercellular band-like deposits of basement membrane, occasional microcysts, nuclear pleomorphism, intracellular hyaline globules, and usual absence of lymphocytes. In difficult cases a concise immunohistochemical panel consisting of AE1/AE3, glypican 3, and OCT3/4 distinguishes solid yolk sac tumor from other neoplasms. α-fetoprotein stains are commonly negative or weak and focal in solid yolk sac tumor and cannot be solely relied on for diagnosis. Common CD117 positivity in solid pattern yolk sac tumors makes it an unreliable discriminator between yolk sac tumor and seminoma.",
keywords = "mediastinum, solid pattern, testis, yolk sac tumor",
author = "Kao, {Chia Sui} and Idrees, {Muhammad T.} and Young, {Robert H.} and Ulbright, {Thomas M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PAS.0b013e31823c510b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "360--367",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Solid pattern yolk sac tumor

T2 - A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 52 cases

AU - Kao, Chia Sui

AU - Idrees, Muhammad T.

AU - Young, Robert H.

AU - Ulbright, Thomas M.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Yolk sac tumors may exhibit numerous patterns. One that has received little attention overall, yet is not uncommon, is a solid pattern, which is especially prone to misinterpretation, usually as seminoma, in biopsy specimens from metastatic or mediastinal sites. This distinction is of critical importance as the 2 tumors are treated differently. To determine features useful in the diagnosis of solid yolk sac tumor we reviewed 52 germ cell tumors (28 testicular primaries, 21 metastases from the testis, and 3 mediastinal primaries) that had a yolk sac tumor component with foci of solid growth, defined as a sheet-like arrangement of tumor cells occupying >2 mm2 and with no or only rare microcysts. Solid yolk sac tumor was almost always associated with other patterns, most commonly microcystic/reticular (75%), glandular (35%), and myxoid (25%). The solid foci consisted of sheets of cells with usually abundant cytoplasm that was mostly (85%) pale to clear and frequently had intercellular basement membrane deposits (75%), rare microcysts (67%), significant nuclear pleomorphism (65%), and hyaline globules (65%). In 2 cases (4%), the cells were small with scant cytoplasm (blastema-like variant). A myxoid background (39%), lymphocytic infiltrate (17%), and an appliqué pattern (8%) were sometimes observed. On immunostaining, AE1/AE3 cytokeratin and glypican 3 provided the most intense and diffuse reactivity for solid yolk sac tumor, whereas α-fetoprotein was negative in 38%. CD117 stained 59%, whereas only rare cells in 1 case (3%) were weakly reactive for podoplanin; OCT3/4 was uniformly negative. We conclude that solid yolk sac tumor can generally be recognized by careful morphologic evaluation, especially its association with other yolk sac tumor patterns, the presence of intercellular band-like deposits of basement membrane, occasional microcysts, nuclear pleomorphism, intracellular hyaline globules, and usual absence of lymphocytes. In difficult cases a concise immunohistochemical panel consisting of AE1/AE3, glypican 3, and OCT3/4 distinguishes solid yolk sac tumor from other neoplasms. α-fetoprotein stains are commonly negative or weak and focal in solid yolk sac tumor and cannot be solely relied on for diagnosis. Common CD117 positivity in solid pattern yolk sac tumors makes it an unreliable discriminator between yolk sac tumor and seminoma.

AB - Yolk sac tumors may exhibit numerous patterns. One that has received little attention overall, yet is not uncommon, is a solid pattern, which is especially prone to misinterpretation, usually as seminoma, in biopsy specimens from metastatic or mediastinal sites. This distinction is of critical importance as the 2 tumors are treated differently. To determine features useful in the diagnosis of solid yolk sac tumor we reviewed 52 germ cell tumors (28 testicular primaries, 21 metastases from the testis, and 3 mediastinal primaries) that had a yolk sac tumor component with foci of solid growth, defined as a sheet-like arrangement of tumor cells occupying >2 mm2 and with no or only rare microcysts. Solid yolk sac tumor was almost always associated with other patterns, most commonly microcystic/reticular (75%), glandular (35%), and myxoid (25%). The solid foci consisted of sheets of cells with usually abundant cytoplasm that was mostly (85%) pale to clear and frequently had intercellular basement membrane deposits (75%), rare microcysts (67%), significant nuclear pleomorphism (65%), and hyaline globules (65%). In 2 cases (4%), the cells were small with scant cytoplasm (blastema-like variant). A myxoid background (39%), lymphocytic infiltrate (17%), and an appliqué pattern (8%) were sometimes observed. On immunostaining, AE1/AE3 cytokeratin and glypican 3 provided the most intense and diffuse reactivity for solid yolk sac tumor, whereas α-fetoprotein was negative in 38%. CD117 stained 59%, whereas only rare cells in 1 case (3%) were weakly reactive for podoplanin; OCT3/4 was uniformly negative. We conclude that solid yolk sac tumor can generally be recognized by careful morphologic evaluation, especially its association with other yolk sac tumor patterns, the presence of intercellular band-like deposits of basement membrane, occasional microcysts, nuclear pleomorphism, intracellular hyaline globules, and usual absence of lymphocytes. In difficult cases a concise immunohistochemical panel consisting of AE1/AE3, glypican 3, and OCT3/4 distinguishes solid yolk sac tumor from other neoplasms. α-fetoprotein stains are commonly negative or weak and focal in solid yolk sac tumor and cannot be solely relied on for diagnosis. Common CD117 positivity in solid pattern yolk sac tumors makes it an unreliable discriminator between yolk sac tumor and seminoma.

KW - mediastinum

KW - solid pattern

KW - testis

KW - yolk sac tumor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857648878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857648878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31823c510b

DO - 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31823c510b

M3 - Article

C2 - 22261704

AN - SCOPUS:84857648878

VL - 36

SP - 360

EP - 367

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 3

ER -