Sound policy trumps politics

States should expand medicaid

Austin B. Frakt, Aaron Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By virtue of the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, states may reject the law's expansion of Medicaid without losing all Medicaid funding from the federal government. The Court's ruling potentially permits a range of Medicaid options for states, including some that may be very attractive from state officials' political perspectives. In the context of the presidential campaign, the uncompensated care problem, and their concerns about costs of expansion, state officials are weighing their options, and some have already pledged to opt out of expansion. We argue that despite the politics, expansion is in fact good for patients, providers, and taxpayers, and states should therefore comply.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-178
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Politics
Uncompensated Care
Supreme Court Decisions
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Federal Government
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Sound policy trumps politics : States should expand medicaid. / Frakt, Austin B.; Carroll, Aaron.

In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2013, p. 165-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a33ddbb15ab94b0f81ed3cec17da5738,
title = "Sound policy trumps politics: States should expand medicaid",
abstract = "By virtue of the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, states may reject the law's expansion of Medicaid without losing all Medicaid funding from the federal government. The Court's ruling potentially permits a range of Medicaid options for states, including some that may be very attractive from state officials' political perspectives. In the context of the presidential campaign, the uncompensated care problem, and their concerns about costs of expansion, state officials are weighing their options, and some have already pledged to opt out of expansion. We argue that despite the politics, expansion is in fact good for patients, providers, and taxpayers, and states should therefore comply.",
author = "Frakt, {Austin B.} and Aaron Carroll",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-1898839",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "165--178",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sound policy trumps politics

T2 - States should expand medicaid

AU - Frakt, Austin B.

AU - Carroll, Aaron

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - By virtue of the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, states may reject the law's expansion of Medicaid without losing all Medicaid funding from the federal government. The Court's ruling potentially permits a range of Medicaid options for states, including some that may be very attractive from state officials' political perspectives. In the context of the presidential campaign, the uncompensated care problem, and their concerns about costs of expansion, state officials are weighing their options, and some have already pledged to opt out of expansion. We argue that despite the politics, expansion is in fact good for patients, providers, and taxpayers, and states should therefore comply.

AB - By virtue of the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, states may reject the law's expansion of Medicaid without losing all Medicaid funding from the federal government. The Court's ruling potentially permits a range of Medicaid options for states, including some that may be very attractive from state officials' political perspectives. In the context of the presidential campaign, the uncompensated care problem, and their concerns about costs of expansion, state officials are weighing their options, and some have already pledged to opt out of expansion. We argue that despite the politics, expansion is in fact good for patients, providers, and taxpayers, and states should therefore comply.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873737539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873737539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-1898839

DO - 10.1215/03616878-1898839

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 165

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 1

ER -