'Stakeholder' attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital

Bernice A. Pescosolido, Eric R. Wright, Saeko Kikuzawa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    For four groups--patients (N = 80), their families or lay caregivers (N = 120), hospital workers (N = 124), and the public (N = 108)- attitudes toward the decision to close the only long-term, urban state hospital are traced over time. Initially, patients were most supportive of the closing decision (65.4%), followed by family members (39.8%), the general public (27.8%), and workers (10.4%). A majority of all groups favored fixing the hospital. Almost half of the clients and more than half of other stakeholders expressed concerns about homelessness. Most attitudes were consistent despite respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The overall profile of group attitudes remained remarkably stable, although there was a good deal of change in individuals' positions. Public support for fixing the hospital decreased significantly, and differences among stakeholders regarding homelessness disappeared. These findings reinforce the importance of ascertaining different constituencies' positions and recognizing the slowly changing response of stakeholders even under massive and successful policy change.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)318-328
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1999

    Fingerprint

    State Hospitals
    Homeless Persons
    stakeholder
    homelessness
    Urban Hospitals
    worker
    Caregivers
    Group
    public support
    caregiver
    family member
    time

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health(social science)
    • Health Professions(all)

    Cite this

    'Stakeholder' attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital. / Pescosolido, Bernice A.; Wright, Eric R.; Kikuzawa, Saeko.

    In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 08.1999, p. 318-328.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Pescosolido, Bernice A. ; Wright, Eric R. ; Kikuzawa, Saeko. / 'Stakeholder' attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital. In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 1999 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 318-328.
    @article{b589322f66ab4fadbca6df5e61fe436e,
    title = "'Stakeholder' attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital",
    abstract = "For four groups--patients (N = 80), their families or lay caregivers (N = 120), hospital workers (N = 124), and the public (N = 108)- attitudes toward the decision to close the only long-term, urban state hospital are traced over time. Initially, patients were most supportive of the closing decision (65.4{\%}), followed by family members (39.8{\%}), the general public (27.8{\%}), and workers (10.4{\%}). A majority of all groups favored fixing the hospital. Almost half of the clients and more than half of other stakeholders expressed concerns about homelessness. Most attitudes were consistent despite respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The overall profile of group attitudes remained remarkably stable, although there was a good deal of change in individuals' positions. Public support for fixing the hospital decreased significantly, and differences among stakeholders regarding homelessness disappeared. These findings reinforce the importance of ascertaining different constituencies' positions and recognizing the slowly changing response of stakeholders even under massive and successful policy change.",
    author = "Pescosolido, {Bernice A.} and Wright, {Eric R.} and Saeko Kikuzawa",
    year = "1999",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1007/BF02287276",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "318--328",
    journal = "Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research",
    issn = "1094-3412",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 'Stakeholder' attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital

    AU - Pescosolido, Bernice A.

    AU - Wright, Eric R.

    AU - Kikuzawa, Saeko

    PY - 1999/8

    Y1 - 1999/8

    N2 - For four groups--patients (N = 80), their families or lay caregivers (N = 120), hospital workers (N = 124), and the public (N = 108)- attitudes toward the decision to close the only long-term, urban state hospital are traced over time. Initially, patients were most supportive of the closing decision (65.4%), followed by family members (39.8%), the general public (27.8%), and workers (10.4%). A majority of all groups favored fixing the hospital. Almost half of the clients and more than half of other stakeholders expressed concerns about homelessness. Most attitudes were consistent despite respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The overall profile of group attitudes remained remarkably stable, although there was a good deal of change in individuals' positions. Public support for fixing the hospital decreased significantly, and differences among stakeholders regarding homelessness disappeared. These findings reinforce the importance of ascertaining different constituencies' positions and recognizing the slowly changing response of stakeholders even under massive and successful policy change.

    AB - For four groups--patients (N = 80), their families or lay caregivers (N = 120), hospital workers (N = 124), and the public (N = 108)- attitudes toward the decision to close the only long-term, urban state hospital are traced over time. Initially, patients were most supportive of the closing decision (65.4%), followed by family members (39.8%), the general public (27.8%), and workers (10.4%). A majority of all groups favored fixing the hospital. Almost half of the clients and more than half of other stakeholders expressed concerns about homelessness. Most attitudes were consistent despite respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The overall profile of group attitudes remained remarkably stable, although there was a good deal of change in individuals' positions. Public support for fixing the hospital decreased significantly, and differences among stakeholders regarding homelessness disappeared. These findings reinforce the importance of ascertaining different constituencies' positions and recognizing the slowly changing response of stakeholders even under massive and successful policy change.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032816210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032816210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/BF02287276

    DO - 10.1007/BF02287276

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 10425869

    AN - SCOPUS:0032816210

    VL - 26

    SP - 318

    EP - 328

    JO - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

    JF - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

    SN - 1094-3412

    IS - 3

    ER -