State barriers to appropriating public health emergency response funds during the 2009 H1N1 response

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We examined state-specific administrative barriers to allocating 2009 H1N1 influenza public health emergency response (PHER) funds. Methods: We conducted a qualitative review of PHER grants management reports to identify and code barriers reported by states in allocating funds. Using linear regression, we examined the relationship between the percentage of funds allocated and each individual barrier and, separately, the cumulative effect of multiple barriers. Results. States reported 6 barrier types, including regulatory issues (n = 14, or 28%), contracting issues (n = 14, or 28%), purchasing issues (n = 6, or 12%), legislative issues (n = 5, or 10%), staffing issues (n = 5, or 10%), and issues transferring funds between state and local health departments (n = 4, or 8%). In multivariate models, having experienced a purchasing barrier was associated with a significant decrease in PHER allocation (B =-26.4; P = .018). Separately, the cumulative effect of having 3 barriers was associated with a decrease in PHER allocation (B =-16.0; P = .079). Conclusions: Purchasing barriers were associated with delayed use of PHER funds. Moreover, the cumulative effect of any 3 barriers hampered the allocation of funds.Understanding barriers to using funds can inform future funding guidance for improved efficiency of response efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S274-S279
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume105
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Financial Management
Emergencies
Public Health
Organized Financing
Human Influenza
Linear Models
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

State barriers to appropriating public health emergency response funds during the 2009 H1N1 response. / Yeager, Valerie; Hurst, David; Menachemi, Nir.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 105, 01.01.2015, p. S274-S279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ab48a9d48c74395bdcad82df7241acf,
title = "State barriers to appropriating public health emergency response funds during the 2009 H1N1 response",
abstract = "Objectives: We examined state-specific administrative barriers to allocating 2009 H1N1 influenza public health emergency response (PHER) funds. Methods: We conducted a qualitative review of PHER grants management reports to identify and code barriers reported by states in allocating funds. Using linear regression, we examined the relationship between the percentage of funds allocated and each individual barrier and, separately, the cumulative effect of multiple barriers. Results. States reported 6 barrier types, including regulatory issues (n = 14, or 28{\%}), contracting issues (n = 14, or 28{\%}), purchasing issues (n = 6, or 12{\%}), legislative issues (n = 5, or 10{\%}), staffing issues (n = 5, or 10{\%}), and issues transferring funds between state and local health departments (n = 4, or 8{\%}). In multivariate models, having experienced a purchasing barrier was associated with a significant decrease in PHER allocation (B =-26.4; P = .018). Separately, the cumulative effect of having 3 barriers was associated with a decrease in PHER allocation (B =-16.0; P = .079). Conclusions: Purchasing barriers were associated with delayed use of PHER funds. Moreover, the cumulative effect of any 3 barriers hampered the allocation of funds.Understanding barriers to using funds can inform future funding guidance for improved efficiency of response efforts.",
author = "Valerie Yeager and David Hurst and Nir Menachemi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2014.302378",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "S274--S279",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - State barriers to appropriating public health emergency response funds during the 2009 H1N1 response

AU - Yeager, Valerie

AU - Hurst, David

AU - Menachemi, Nir

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objectives: We examined state-specific administrative barriers to allocating 2009 H1N1 influenza public health emergency response (PHER) funds. Methods: We conducted a qualitative review of PHER grants management reports to identify and code barriers reported by states in allocating funds. Using linear regression, we examined the relationship between the percentage of funds allocated and each individual barrier and, separately, the cumulative effect of multiple barriers. Results. States reported 6 barrier types, including regulatory issues (n = 14, or 28%), contracting issues (n = 14, or 28%), purchasing issues (n = 6, or 12%), legislative issues (n = 5, or 10%), staffing issues (n = 5, or 10%), and issues transferring funds between state and local health departments (n = 4, or 8%). In multivariate models, having experienced a purchasing barrier was associated with a significant decrease in PHER allocation (B =-26.4; P = .018). Separately, the cumulative effect of having 3 barriers was associated with a decrease in PHER allocation (B =-16.0; P = .079). Conclusions: Purchasing barriers were associated with delayed use of PHER funds. Moreover, the cumulative effect of any 3 barriers hampered the allocation of funds.Understanding barriers to using funds can inform future funding guidance for improved efficiency of response efforts.

AB - Objectives: We examined state-specific administrative barriers to allocating 2009 H1N1 influenza public health emergency response (PHER) funds. Methods: We conducted a qualitative review of PHER grants management reports to identify and code barriers reported by states in allocating funds. Using linear regression, we examined the relationship between the percentage of funds allocated and each individual barrier and, separately, the cumulative effect of multiple barriers. Results. States reported 6 barrier types, including regulatory issues (n = 14, or 28%), contracting issues (n = 14, or 28%), purchasing issues (n = 6, or 12%), legislative issues (n = 5, or 10%), staffing issues (n = 5, or 10%), and issues transferring funds between state and local health departments (n = 4, or 8%). In multivariate models, having experienced a purchasing barrier was associated with a significant decrease in PHER allocation (B =-26.4; P = .018). Separately, the cumulative effect of having 3 barriers was associated with a decrease in PHER allocation (B =-16.0; P = .079). Conclusions: Purchasing barriers were associated with delayed use of PHER funds. Moreover, the cumulative effect of any 3 barriers hampered the allocation of funds.Understanding barriers to using funds can inform future funding guidance for improved efficiency of response efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924735259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924735259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302378

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302378

M3 - Article

C2 - 25689213

AN - SCOPUS:84924735259

VL - 105

SP - S274-S279

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

ER -