Statistical and diagnostic adequacy of a short form of the Halstead category test

Kurt A. Moehle, Kathleen B. Fitzhugh-Bell, Eric Engleman, David Hennon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current study examined the statistical adequacy of shortened versions (SF) of the Halstead Category Test (CT) Through several multiple regression analyses (MRA), using a large sample (N = 1012) of neurologically- referred patients to allow for reasonable confidence in the reliability of the findings. The diagnostic accuracy of the psychometrically soundest short form (consisting of subtests 4, 6, and 3) was then compared to that of the long form on a subsample of 590 patients from the first study for whom brain damage had either been medically confirmed or ruled out. Results suggest that a short form may be psychometrically feasible, with little loss in diagnostic accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Neuroscience
Volume42
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brain damage
  • Halstead Category Test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical and diagnostic adequacy of a short form of the Halstead category test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this