Statistical issues for combining multiple caries diagnostics for demonstrating caries efficacy

Barry Katz, E. Huntington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Caries efficacy in clinical trials has been based primarily on visual examinations supplemented by Fiber Optic Transillumination (FOTI) and radiography, with the assessments combined at the surface level to classify each surface as to its caries status. Newer caries diagnostics techniques measure the caries process in a quantitative manner and so thus yield continuous rather than ordinal results. The objective of this study was to examine various methods for the analysis of multiple outcomes in clinical trials and to compare their usefulness for the analysis of caries trials. Four global tests (rank sum, ordinary least squares, general least squares, and generalized estimating equations) and two caries indices (based on average and maximum values of the methods) were evaluated with the use of one-year follow-up data from 1063 children in a recent caries trial. A new hybrid method was also developed and evaluated. All of the methods performed well when the diagnostic measures showed product differences in caries in the same direction. Ease of use, interpretability, and distributional assumptions must be considered before a consensus method for analysis of multiple diagnostic measures in caries trials can be determined.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Dental Research
Volume83
Issue numberSPEC. ISS. C
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Least-Squares Analysis
Clinical Trials
Transillumination
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Nonparametric Statistics
Radiography
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Caries diagnostics
  • Clinical trials
  • Statistical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Statistical issues for combining multiple caries diagnostics for demonstrating caries efficacy. / Katz, Barry; Huntington, E.

In: Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. SPEC. ISS. C, 01.2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4158eb238dfd48aabef4ba0554b5ba18,
title = "Statistical issues for combining multiple caries diagnostics for demonstrating caries efficacy",
abstract = "Caries efficacy in clinical trials has been based primarily on visual examinations supplemented by Fiber Optic Transillumination (FOTI) and radiography, with the assessments combined at the surface level to classify each surface as to its caries status. Newer caries diagnostics techniques measure the caries process in a quantitative manner and so thus yield continuous rather than ordinal results. The objective of this study was to examine various methods for the analysis of multiple outcomes in clinical trials and to compare their usefulness for the analysis of caries trials. Four global tests (rank sum, ordinary least squares, general least squares, and generalized estimating equations) and two caries indices (based on average and maximum values of the methods) were evaluated with the use of one-year follow-up data from 1063 children in a recent caries trial. A new hybrid method was also developed and evaluated. All of the methods performed well when the diagnostic measures showed product differences in caries in the same direction. Ease of use, interpretability, and distributional assumptions must be considered before a consensus method for analysis of multiple diagnostic measures in caries trials can be determined.",
keywords = "Caries diagnostics, Clinical trials, Statistical analysis",
author = "Barry Katz and E. Huntington",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/154405910408301S22",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
journal = "Journal of Dental Research",
issn = "0022-0345",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "SPEC. ISS. C",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical issues for combining multiple caries diagnostics for demonstrating caries efficacy

AU - Katz, Barry

AU - Huntington, E.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Caries efficacy in clinical trials has been based primarily on visual examinations supplemented by Fiber Optic Transillumination (FOTI) and radiography, with the assessments combined at the surface level to classify each surface as to its caries status. Newer caries diagnostics techniques measure the caries process in a quantitative manner and so thus yield continuous rather than ordinal results. The objective of this study was to examine various methods for the analysis of multiple outcomes in clinical trials and to compare their usefulness for the analysis of caries trials. Four global tests (rank sum, ordinary least squares, general least squares, and generalized estimating equations) and two caries indices (based on average and maximum values of the methods) were evaluated with the use of one-year follow-up data from 1063 children in a recent caries trial. A new hybrid method was also developed and evaluated. All of the methods performed well when the diagnostic measures showed product differences in caries in the same direction. Ease of use, interpretability, and distributional assumptions must be considered before a consensus method for analysis of multiple diagnostic measures in caries trials can be determined.

AB - Caries efficacy in clinical trials has been based primarily on visual examinations supplemented by Fiber Optic Transillumination (FOTI) and radiography, with the assessments combined at the surface level to classify each surface as to its caries status. Newer caries diagnostics techniques measure the caries process in a quantitative manner and so thus yield continuous rather than ordinal results. The objective of this study was to examine various methods for the analysis of multiple outcomes in clinical trials and to compare their usefulness for the analysis of caries trials. Four global tests (rank sum, ordinary least squares, general least squares, and generalized estimating equations) and two caries indices (based on average and maximum values of the methods) were evaluated with the use of one-year follow-up data from 1063 children in a recent caries trial. A new hybrid method was also developed and evaluated. All of the methods performed well when the diagnostic measures showed product differences in caries in the same direction. Ease of use, interpretability, and distributional assumptions must be considered before a consensus method for analysis of multiple diagnostic measures in caries trials can be determined.

KW - Caries diagnostics

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Statistical analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143056177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143056177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/154405910408301S22

DO - 10.1177/154405910408301S22

M3 - Article

C2 - 15286134

AN - SCOPUS:4143056177

VL - 83

JO - Journal of Dental Research

JF - Journal of Dental Research

SN - 0022-0345

IS - SPEC. ISS. C

ER -