Status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Osteopathic Medical School Curriculum

Dale W. Saxon, Godfrey Tunnicliff, James J. Brokaw, Beat U. Raess

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reflecting society's interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), most allopathic medical schools in the United States offer instruction in CAM. Pertinent information about the teaching of CAM at osteopathic medical schools is lacking. The authors therefore sought to document the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools and compare their findings with those reported for allopathic medical schools in a recently published survey. Phone conversations with academic officials at each of the 19 colleges of osteopathic medicine revealed that only one school did not teach CAM. With the help of these officials, the authors identified 25 CAM instructors at 18 osteopathic medical schools and sent them questionnaires. All returned a completed form with details about CAM instruction at their schools. The authors found that CAM material was usually presented in required courses sponsored by clinical departments, was most likely taught in the first 2 years of medical school, and involved fewer than 20 contact hours of instruction. The topics most often taught were acupuncture (68%), herbs and botanicals (68%), spirituality (56%), dietary therapy (52%), and homeopathy (48%). Most (72%) CAM instructors were also practitioners of CAM modes of therapy. Few (12%) of the instructors taught CAM from an evidence-based perspective. The authors conclude that the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools is similar to that offered at allopathic medical schools and that both osteopathic and allopathic medical schools should strive to teach CAM with less advocacy and more reliance on evidence-based medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-126
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
Volume104
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Medical Schools
Curriculum
Osteopathic Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Osteopathic Medical School Curriculum. / Saxon, Dale W.; Tunnicliff, Godfrey; Brokaw, James J.; Raess, Beat U.

In: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol. 104, No. 3, 01.03.2004, p. 121-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Saxon, Dale W. ; Tunnicliff, Godfrey ; Brokaw, James J. ; Raess, Beat U. / Status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Osteopathic Medical School Curriculum. In: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2004 ; Vol. 104, No. 3. pp. 121-126.
@article{249415ae5b244e44ae5924a6465db71a,
title = "Status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Osteopathic Medical School Curriculum",
abstract = "Reflecting society's interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), most allopathic medical schools in the United States offer instruction in CAM. Pertinent information about the teaching of CAM at osteopathic medical schools is lacking. The authors therefore sought to document the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools and compare their findings with those reported for allopathic medical schools in a recently published survey. Phone conversations with academic officials at each of the 19 colleges of osteopathic medicine revealed that only one school did not teach CAM. With the help of these officials, the authors identified 25 CAM instructors at 18 osteopathic medical schools and sent them questionnaires. All returned a completed form with details about CAM instruction at their schools. The authors found that CAM material was usually presented in required courses sponsored by clinical departments, was most likely taught in the first 2 years of medical school, and involved fewer than 20 contact hours of instruction. The topics most often taught were acupuncture (68{\%}), herbs and botanicals (68{\%}), spirituality (56{\%}), dietary therapy (52{\%}), and homeopathy (48{\%}). Most (72{\%}) CAM instructors were also practitioners of CAM modes of therapy. Few (12{\%}) of the instructors taught CAM from an evidence-based perspective. The authors conclude that the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools is similar to that offered at allopathic medical schools and that both osteopathic and allopathic medical schools should strive to teach CAM with less advocacy and more reliance on evidence-based medicine.",
author = "Saxon, {Dale W.} and Godfrey Tunnicliff and Brokaw, {James J.} and Raess, {Beat U.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "121--126",
journal = "The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association",
issn = "0098-6151",
publisher = "American Osteopathic Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Osteopathic Medical School Curriculum

AU - Saxon, Dale W.

AU - Tunnicliff, Godfrey

AU - Brokaw, James J.

AU - Raess, Beat U.

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - Reflecting society's interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), most allopathic medical schools in the United States offer instruction in CAM. Pertinent information about the teaching of CAM at osteopathic medical schools is lacking. The authors therefore sought to document the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools and compare their findings with those reported for allopathic medical schools in a recently published survey. Phone conversations with academic officials at each of the 19 colleges of osteopathic medicine revealed that only one school did not teach CAM. With the help of these officials, the authors identified 25 CAM instructors at 18 osteopathic medical schools and sent them questionnaires. All returned a completed form with details about CAM instruction at their schools. The authors found that CAM material was usually presented in required courses sponsored by clinical departments, was most likely taught in the first 2 years of medical school, and involved fewer than 20 contact hours of instruction. The topics most often taught were acupuncture (68%), herbs and botanicals (68%), spirituality (56%), dietary therapy (52%), and homeopathy (48%). Most (72%) CAM instructors were also practitioners of CAM modes of therapy. Few (12%) of the instructors taught CAM from an evidence-based perspective. The authors conclude that the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools is similar to that offered at allopathic medical schools and that both osteopathic and allopathic medical schools should strive to teach CAM with less advocacy and more reliance on evidence-based medicine.

AB - Reflecting society's interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), most allopathic medical schools in the United States offer instruction in CAM. Pertinent information about the teaching of CAM at osteopathic medical schools is lacking. The authors therefore sought to document the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools and compare their findings with those reported for allopathic medical schools in a recently published survey. Phone conversations with academic officials at each of the 19 colleges of osteopathic medicine revealed that only one school did not teach CAM. With the help of these officials, the authors identified 25 CAM instructors at 18 osteopathic medical schools and sent them questionnaires. All returned a completed form with details about CAM instruction at their schools. The authors found that CAM material was usually presented in required courses sponsored by clinical departments, was most likely taught in the first 2 years of medical school, and involved fewer than 20 contact hours of instruction. The topics most often taught were acupuncture (68%), herbs and botanicals (68%), spirituality (56%), dietary therapy (52%), and homeopathy (48%). Most (72%) CAM instructors were also practitioners of CAM modes of therapy. Few (12%) of the instructors taught CAM from an evidence-based perspective. The authors conclude that the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools is similar to that offered at allopathic medical schools and that both osteopathic and allopathic medical schools should strive to teach CAM with less advocacy and more reliance on evidence-based medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642546502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642546502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15083987

AN - SCOPUS:1642546502

VL - 104

SP - 121

EP - 126

JO - The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

JF - The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

SN - 0098-6151

IS - 3

ER -