Status, Threat, and Stereotypes: Understanding the Function of Rape Myth Acceptance

Kristine Chapleau, Debra L. Oswald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study applied system justification theory to understand the function of rape myth acceptance. Participants read a rape scenario that manipulated the difference in status between the perpetrator and victim, as well as the potential threat to perpetrator as depicted by whom the victim told about the rape. People's opposition to equality and gender separately and together predicted rape myth acceptance. People with higher opposition to equality reported less rape myth acceptance when a higher-status perpetrator got away with rape than when he was reported to police. Conversely, people with lower opposition to equality reported more rape myth acceptance when the higher-status perpetrator got away with rape. People's opposition to equality and gender interacted such that men with lower opposition to equality also reported more rape myth acceptance when the equal- and lower-status perpetrator got away with rape. Gender predicted rape myth acceptance such that when the lower-status perpetrator was reported to the police, women reported more rape myth acceptance whereas men reported less rape myth acceptance. This is the first study to show that rape myth acceptance is malleable and strategically motivated. These findings have implications for not only understanding rape myth acceptance, but also other ideologies that explain unethical behavior by advantaged groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-41
Number of pages24
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

rape
stereotype
myth
acceptance
threat
equality
opposition
gender
police
system theory
Ideologies

Keywords

  • Liberal reactive hypothesis
  • Rape myth acceptance
  • Sexual violence
  • Stereotypes
  • System justification theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Anthropology
  • Law

Cite this

Status, Threat, and Stereotypes : Understanding the Function of Rape Myth Acceptance. / Chapleau, Kristine; Oswald, Debra L.

In: Social Justice Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 18-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dc9dc0970a864b439c67c708857d993b,
title = "Status, Threat, and Stereotypes: Understanding the Function of Rape Myth Acceptance",
abstract = "This study applied system justification theory to understand the function of rape myth acceptance. Participants read a rape scenario that manipulated the difference in status between the perpetrator and victim, as well as the potential threat to perpetrator as depicted by whom the victim told about the rape. People's opposition to equality and gender separately and together predicted rape myth acceptance. People with higher opposition to equality reported less rape myth acceptance when a higher-status perpetrator got away with rape than when he was reported to police. Conversely, people with lower opposition to equality reported more rape myth acceptance when the higher-status perpetrator got away with rape. People's opposition to equality and gender interacted such that men with lower opposition to equality also reported more rape myth acceptance when the equal- and lower-status perpetrator got away with rape. Gender predicted rape myth acceptance such that when the lower-status perpetrator was reported to the police, women reported more rape myth acceptance whereas men reported less rape myth acceptance. This is the first study to show that rape myth acceptance is malleable and strategically motivated. These findings have implications for not only understanding rape myth acceptance, but also other ideologies that explain unethical behavior by advantaged groups.",
keywords = "Liberal reactive hypothesis, Rape myth acceptance, Sexual violence, Stereotypes, System justification theory",
author = "Kristine Chapleau and Oswald, {Debra L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "18--41",
journal = "Social Justice Research",
issn = "0885-7466",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Status, Threat, and Stereotypes

T2 - Understanding the Function of Rape Myth Acceptance

AU - Chapleau, Kristine

AU - Oswald, Debra L.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - This study applied system justification theory to understand the function of rape myth acceptance. Participants read a rape scenario that manipulated the difference in status between the perpetrator and victim, as well as the potential threat to perpetrator as depicted by whom the victim told about the rape. People's opposition to equality and gender separately and together predicted rape myth acceptance. People with higher opposition to equality reported less rape myth acceptance when a higher-status perpetrator got away with rape than when he was reported to police. Conversely, people with lower opposition to equality reported more rape myth acceptance when the higher-status perpetrator got away with rape. People's opposition to equality and gender interacted such that men with lower opposition to equality also reported more rape myth acceptance when the equal- and lower-status perpetrator got away with rape. Gender predicted rape myth acceptance such that when the lower-status perpetrator was reported to the police, women reported more rape myth acceptance whereas men reported less rape myth acceptance. This is the first study to show that rape myth acceptance is malleable and strategically motivated. These findings have implications for not only understanding rape myth acceptance, but also other ideologies that explain unethical behavior by advantaged groups.

AB - This study applied system justification theory to understand the function of rape myth acceptance. Participants read a rape scenario that manipulated the difference in status between the perpetrator and victim, as well as the potential threat to perpetrator as depicted by whom the victim told about the rape. People's opposition to equality and gender separately and together predicted rape myth acceptance. People with higher opposition to equality reported less rape myth acceptance when a higher-status perpetrator got away with rape than when he was reported to police. Conversely, people with lower opposition to equality reported more rape myth acceptance when the higher-status perpetrator got away with rape. People's opposition to equality and gender interacted such that men with lower opposition to equality also reported more rape myth acceptance when the equal- and lower-status perpetrator got away with rape. Gender predicted rape myth acceptance such that when the lower-status perpetrator was reported to the police, women reported more rape myth acceptance whereas men reported less rape myth acceptance. This is the first study to show that rape myth acceptance is malleable and strategically motivated. These findings have implications for not only understanding rape myth acceptance, but also other ideologies that explain unethical behavior by advantaged groups.

KW - Liberal reactive hypothesis

KW - Rape myth acceptance

KW - Sexual violence

KW - Stereotypes

KW - System justification theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874657966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874657966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z

DO - 10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874657966

VL - 26

SP - 18

EP - 41

JO - Social Justice Research

JF - Social Justice Research

SN - 0885-7466

IS - 1

ER -