Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an II-gauge vacuum-assisted device: Persistent underestimation of disease

Won Bokran, Handel E. Reynolds, Christina L. Lazaridis, Valerie Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS. Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p =. 13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION. The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-229
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume173
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1999

Fingerprint

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Firearms
Vacuum
Breast
Biopsy
Equipment and Supplies
Needle Biopsy
Carcinoma
Segmental Mastectomy
Lost to Follow-Up

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an II-gauge vacuum-assisted device : Persistent underestimation of disease. / Bokran, Won; Reynolds, Handel E.; Lazaridis, Christina L.; Jackson, Valerie.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 173, No. 1, 07.1999, p. 227-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c7a3c7bbf494940a46cce8aa7d41566,
title = "Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an II-gauge vacuum-assisted device: Persistent underestimation of disease",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS. Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35{\%}) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15{\%}) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p =. 13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION. The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.",
author = "Won Bokran and Reynolds, {Handel E.} and Lazaridis, {Christina L.} and Valerie Jackson",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "173",
pages = "227--229",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an II-gauge vacuum-assisted device

T2 - Persistent underestimation of disease

AU - Bokran, Won

AU - Reynolds, Handel E.

AU - Lazaridis, Christina L.

AU - Jackson, Valerie

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS. Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p =. 13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION. The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS. Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p =. 13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION. The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345593581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345593581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10397131

AN - SCOPUS:0345593581

VL - 173

SP - 227

EP - 229

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -