Structured review of enamel erosion literature (1980-1998): A critical appraisal of experimental, clinical review publications

Gerardo Maupome, J. M. Ray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To attain an objective account of the methods to measure enamel erosion used in 1980-1998 publications, a structured review of the literature was undertaken. METHODS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to 731 clinical/experimental research and review reports. Eighty-five included papers were subsequently rated according to 'hierarchy of evidence' guidelines to assess the strength of the report's design and the relevance of the evidence to replicating enamel erosion in vivo in humans. Scores were assigned to rate each aspect in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 16 clinical, 13 review and 56 experimental papers were assessed; 36.4% were published during 1996-1998. Excluding reviews, 16 papers were qualitative and 56 quantitative; 51 used human enamel. Our classification yielded nine groups of methods (five scoring systems and 26 measurement techniques). CTFPHE (Can Med Assoc J 1992; 147: 443) grading of research reports indicated that 2.8% provided evidence grade I; 20.8%, grade IIa; 63.9%, grade III; and 12.5%, grade IV. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a consistent increase in the body of knowledge. The overall quality of publications has not substantially changed over time. Experimental studies were more often quantitative, and quantitative studies had better research designs. No single group of research methods had obviously superior research designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-207
Number of pages11
JournalOral Diseases
Volume6
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Enamel
Publications
Research Design
Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • Acid
  • Enamel
  • Erosion
  • Human
  • Saliva
  • Structured review
  • Tooth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Structured review of enamel erosion literature (1980-1998) : A critical appraisal of experimental, clinical review publications. / Maupome, Gerardo; Ray, J. M.

In: Oral Diseases, Vol. 6, No. 4, 07.2000, p. 197-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{18b388e798f24c6eaf46a64d2dcd0f3d,
title = "Structured review of enamel erosion literature (1980-1998): A critical appraisal of experimental, clinical review publications",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To attain an objective account of the methods to measure enamel erosion used in 1980-1998 publications, a structured review of the literature was undertaken. METHODS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to 731 clinical/experimental research and review reports. Eighty-five included papers were subsequently rated according to 'hierarchy of evidence' guidelines to assess the strength of the report's design and the relevance of the evidence to replicating enamel erosion in vivo in humans. Scores were assigned to rate each aspect in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 16 clinical, 13 review and 56 experimental papers were assessed; 36.4{\%} were published during 1996-1998. Excluding reviews, 16 papers were qualitative and 56 quantitative; 51 used human enamel. Our classification yielded nine groups of methods (five scoring systems and 26 measurement techniques). CTFPHE (Can Med Assoc J 1992; 147: 443) grading of research reports indicated that 2.8{\%} provided evidence grade I; 20.8{\%}, grade IIa; 63.9{\%}, grade III; and 12.5{\%}, grade IV. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a consistent increase in the body of knowledge. The overall quality of publications has not substantially changed over time. Experimental studies were more often quantitative, and quantitative studies had better research designs. No single group of research methods had obviously superior research designs.",
keywords = "Acid, Enamel, Erosion, Human, Saliva, Structured review, Tooth",
author = "Gerardo Maupome and Ray, {J. M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "197--207",
journal = "Oral Diseases",
issn = "1354-523X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured review of enamel erosion literature (1980-1998)

T2 - A critical appraisal of experimental, clinical review publications

AU - Maupome, Gerardo

AU - Ray, J. M.

PY - 2000/7

Y1 - 2000/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To attain an objective account of the methods to measure enamel erosion used in 1980-1998 publications, a structured review of the literature was undertaken. METHODS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to 731 clinical/experimental research and review reports. Eighty-five included papers were subsequently rated according to 'hierarchy of evidence' guidelines to assess the strength of the report's design and the relevance of the evidence to replicating enamel erosion in vivo in humans. Scores were assigned to rate each aspect in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 16 clinical, 13 review and 56 experimental papers were assessed; 36.4% were published during 1996-1998. Excluding reviews, 16 papers were qualitative and 56 quantitative; 51 used human enamel. Our classification yielded nine groups of methods (five scoring systems and 26 measurement techniques). CTFPHE (Can Med Assoc J 1992; 147: 443) grading of research reports indicated that 2.8% provided evidence grade I; 20.8%, grade IIa; 63.9%, grade III; and 12.5%, grade IV. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a consistent increase in the body of knowledge. The overall quality of publications has not substantially changed over time. Experimental studies were more often quantitative, and quantitative studies had better research designs. No single group of research methods had obviously superior research designs.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To attain an objective account of the methods to measure enamel erosion used in 1980-1998 publications, a structured review of the literature was undertaken. METHODS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to 731 clinical/experimental research and review reports. Eighty-five included papers were subsequently rated according to 'hierarchy of evidence' guidelines to assess the strength of the report's design and the relevance of the evidence to replicating enamel erosion in vivo in humans. Scores were assigned to rate each aspect in the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 16 clinical, 13 review and 56 experimental papers were assessed; 36.4% were published during 1996-1998. Excluding reviews, 16 papers were qualitative and 56 quantitative; 51 used human enamel. Our classification yielded nine groups of methods (five scoring systems and 26 measurement techniques). CTFPHE (Can Med Assoc J 1992; 147: 443) grading of research reports indicated that 2.8% provided evidence grade I; 20.8%, grade IIa; 63.9%, grade III; and 12.5%, grade IV. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a consistent increase in the body of knowledge. The overall quality of publications has not substantially changed over time. Experimental studies were more often quantitative, and quantitative studies had better research designs. No single group of research methods had obviously superior research designs.

KW - Acid

KW - Enamel

KW - Erosion

KW - Human

KW - Saliva

KW - Structured review

KW - Tooth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033913840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033913840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10918556

AN - SCOPUS:0033913840

VL - 6

SP - 197

EP - 207

JO - Oral Diseases

JF - Oral Diseases

SN - 1354-523X

IS - 4

ER -