Structured single-observer methods of evaluation for the assessment of ward performance on the surgical clerkship

Gary Dunnington, Liz Reisner, Don Witzke, John Fulginiti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the traditional method (TM) of evaluating ward performance on the surgical clerkship with four structured, single-observer methods (SSOM) of evaluating the clinical skills demonstrated in patient workups, progress notes, physical examination, and technical performance. SSOM differed from TM in preciseness of evaluation criteria, training of evaluator, and amount of direct observation of clinical performance. SSOM appeared to be a more precise measurement instrument than TM and far more sensitive to the detection of clinical improvement. The study documents the significant contribution of a nurse-educator to the evaluation process, as this contribution correlates well with TM yet provides a unique and independent perspective. Finally, SSOM of evaluation correlated significantly with oral examination and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) test results. Addition of SSOM to TM is recommended for clerkship evaluation of ward performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-426
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume159
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oral Diagnosis
Coroners and Medical Examiners
Clinical Competence
Physical Examination
Nurses
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Structured single-observer methods of evaluation for the assessment of ward performance on the surgical clerkship. / Dunnington, Gary; Reisner, Liz; Witzke, Don; Fulginiti, John.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 159, No. 4, 1990, p. 423-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cfeeb201b304d558795a6b61ef63b55,
title = "Structured single-observer methods of evaluation for the assessment of ward performance on the surgical clerkship",
abstract = "This study compares the traditional method (TM) of evaluating ward performance on the surgical clerkship with four structured, single-observer methods (SSOM) of evaluating the clinical skills demonstrated in patient workups, progress notes, physical examination, and technical performance. SSOM differed from TM in preciseness of evaluation criteria, training of evaluator, and amount of direct observation of clinical performance. SSOM appeared to be a more precise measurement instrument than TM and far more sensitive to the detection of clinical improvement. The study documents the significant contribution of a nurse-educator to the evaluation process, as this contribution correlates well with TM yet provides a unique and independent perspective. Finally, SSOM of evaluation correlated significantly with oral examination and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) test results. Addition of SSOM to TM is recommended for clerkship evaluation of ward performance.",
author = "Gary Dunnington and Liz Reisner and Don Witzke and John Fulginiti",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81289-9",
language = "English",
volume = "159",
pages = "423--426",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured single-observer methods of evaluation for the assessment of ward performance on the surgical clerkship

AU - Dunnington, Gary

AU - Reisner, Liz

AU - Witzke, Don

AU - Fulginiti, John

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - This study compares the traditional method (TM) of evaluating ward performance on the surgical clerkship with four structured, single-observer methods (SSOM) of evaluating the clinical skills demonstrated in patient workups, progress notes, physical examination, and technical performance. SSOM differed from TM in preciseness of evaluation criteria, training of evaluator, and amount of direct observation of clinical performance. SSOM appeared to be a more precise measurement instrument than TM and far more sensitive to the detection of clinical improvement. The study documents the significant contribution of a nurse-educator to the evaluation process, as this contribution correlates well with TM yet provides a unique and independent perspective. Finally, SSOM of evaluation correlated significantly with oral examination and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) test results. Addition of SSOM to TM is recommended for clerkship evaluation of ward performance.

AB - This study compares the traditional method (TM) of evaluating ward performance on the surgical clerkship with four structured, single-observer methods (SSOM) of evaluating the clinical skills demonstrated in patient workups, progress notes, physical examination, and technical performance. SSOM differed from TM in preciseness of evaluation criteria, training of evaluator, and amount of direct observation of clinical performance. SSOM appeared to be a more precise measurement instrument than TM and far more sensitive to the detection of clinical improvement. The study documents the significant contribution of a nurse-educator to the evaluation process, as this contribution correlates well with TM yet provides a unique and independent perspective. Finally, SSOM of evaluation correlated significantly with oral examination and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) test results. Addition of SSOM to TM is recommended for clerkship evaluation of ward performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025275158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025275158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81289-9

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81289-9

M3 - Article

VL - 159

SP - 423

EP - 426

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -