Studies of implicit prototype extraction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease

Robert M. Nosofsky, Stephen E. Denton, Safa R. Zaki, Anne F. Murphy-Knudsen, Frederick Unverzagt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of incidental category learning support the hypothesis of an implicit prototype-extraction system that is distinct from explicit memory (Smith, 2008). In those studies, patients with explicit-memory impairments due to damage to the medial-temporal lobe performed normally in implicit categorization tasks (Bozoki, Grossman, & Smith, 2006; Knowlton & Squire, 1993). However, alternative interpretations are that (a) even people with impairments to a single memory system have sufficient resources to succeed on the particular categorization tasks that have been tested (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998; Zaki & Nosofsky, 2001) and (b) working memory can be used at time of test to learn the categories (Palmeri & Flanery, 1999). In the present experiments, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease were tested in prototype-extraction tasks to examine these possibilities. In a categorization task involving discrete-feature stimuli, the majority of subjects relied on memories for exceedingly few features, even when the task structure strongly encouraged reliance on broad-based prototypes. In a dot-pattern categorization task, even the memory-impaired patients were able to use working memory at time of test to extract the category structure (at least for the stimulus set used in past work). We argue that the results weaken the past case made in favor of a separate system of implicit prototype extraction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)860-880
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

dementia
Alzheimer Disease
Short-Term Memory
stimulus
Temporal Lobe
Cognitive Dysfunction
Prototype
Alzheimer's Disease
Mild Cognitive Impairment
Learning
damages
interpretation
experiment
resources
learning
Stimulus
Working Memory
Impairment

Keywords

  • Amnesia
  • Categorization
  • Explicit memory
  • Implicit learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Studies of implicit prototype extraction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease. / Nosofsky, Robert M.; Denton, Stephen E.; Zaki, Safa R.; Murphy-Knudsen, Anne F.; Unverzagt, Frederick.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 38, No. 4, 07.2012, p. 860-880.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{664cb230fc4143e7b7063b9ce4616ea3,
title = "Studies of implicit prototype extraction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Studies of incidental category learning support the hypothesis of an implicit prototype-extraction system that is distinct from explicit memory (Smith, 2008). In those studies, patients with explicit-memory impairments due to damage to the medial-temporal lobe performed normally in implicit categorization tasks (Bozoki, Grossman, & Smith, 2006; Knowlton & Squire, 1993). However, alternative interpretations are that (a) even people with impairments to a single memory system have sufficient resources to succeed on the particular categorization tasks that have been tested (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998; Zaki & Nosofsky, 2001) and (b) working memory can be used at time of test to learn the categories (Palmeri & Flanery, 1999). In the present experiments, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease were tested in prototype-extraction tasks to examine these possibilities. In a categorization task involving discrete-feature stimuli, the majority of subjects relied on memories for exceedingly few features, even when the task structure strongly encouraged reliance on broad-based prototypes. In a dot-pattern categorization task, even the memory-impaired patients were able to use working memory at time of test to extract the category structure (at least for the stimulus set used in past work). We argue that the results weaken the past case made in favor of a separate system of implicit prototype extraction.",
keywords = "Amnesia, Categorization, Explicit memory, Implicit learning",
author = "Nosofsky, {Robert M.} and Denton, {Stephen E.} and Zaki, {Safa R.} and Murphy-Knudsen, {Anne F.} and Frederick Unverzagt",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/a0028064",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "860--880",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studies of implicit prototype extraction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease

AU - Nosofsky, Robert M.

AU - Denton, Stephen E.

AU - Zaki, Safa R.

AU - Murphy-Knudsen, Anne F.

AU - Unverzagt, Frederick

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Studies of incidental category learning support the hypothesis of an implicit prototype-extraction system that is distinct from explicit memory (Smith, 2008). In those studies, patients with explicit-memory impairments due to damage to the medial-temporal lobe performed normally in implicit categorization tasks (Bozoki, Grossman, & Smith, 2006; Knowlton & Squire, 1993). However, alternative interpretations are that (a) even people with impairments to a single memory system have sufficient resources to succeed on the particular categorization tasks that have been tested (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998; Zaki & Nosofsky, 2001) and (b) working memory can be used at time of test to learn the categories (Palmeri & Flanery, 1999). In the present experiments, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease were tested in prototype-extraction tasks to examine these possibilities. In a categorization task involving discrete-feature stimuli, the majority of subjects relied on memories for exceedingly few features, even when the task structure strongly encouraged reliance on broad-based prototypes. In a dot-pattern categorization task, even the memory-impaired patients were able to use working memory at time of test to extract the category structure (at least for the stimulus set used in past work). We argue that the results weaken the past case made in favor of a separate system of implicit prototype extraction.

AB - Studies of incidental category learning support the hypothesis of an implicit prototype-extraction system that is distinct from explicit memory (Smith, 2008). In those studies, patients with explicit-memory impairments due to damage to the medial-temporal lobe performed normally in implicit categorization tasks (Bozoki, Grossman, & Smith, 2006; Knowlton & Squire, 1993). However, alternative interpretations are that (a) even people with impairments to a single memory system have sufficient resources to succeed on the particular categorization tasks that have been tested (Nosofsky & Zaki, 1998; Zaki & Nosofsky, 2001) and (b) working memory can be used at time of test to learn the categories (Palmeri & Flanery, 1999). In the present experiments, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer's disease were tested in prototype-extraction tasks to examine these possibilities. In a categorization task involving discrete-feature stimuli, the majority of subjects relied on memories for exceedingly few features, even when the task structure strongly encouraged reliance on broad-based prototypes. In a dot-pattern categorization task, even the memory-impaired patients were able to use working memory at time of test to extract the category structure (at least for the stimulus set used in past work). We argue that the results weaken the past case made in favor of a separate system of implicit prototype extraction.

KW - Amnesia

KW - Categorization

KW - Explicit memory

KW - Implicit learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871692484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871692484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0028064

DO - 10.1037/a0028064

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 860

EP - 880

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 4

ER -