Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology

A decision analysis

J. R. Scott, H. T. Sharp, M. K. Dodson, P. A. Norton, H. R. Warner, H. T. Huddleston, Marguerite Shepard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the risks and benefits of subtotal (supracervical) hysterectomy with those of total hysterectomy in women at low risk for cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analysis was performed. Baseline probabilities for operative and postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life were established for subtotal and total hysterectomy. RESULTS: Operative complication rates and ranges for total abdominal hysterectomy were infection 3.0% (3.0% to 20.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (2.0% to 15.4%), and adjacent organ injury 1.0% (0.7% to 2.0%). Those for subtotal hysterectomy were infection 1.4% (1.0% to 5.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (0.7% to 4.0%), and adjacent organ injury 0.7% (0.6% to 1.0%). Operative mortality, the risk for development of cervicovaginal cancer, and long-term adverse effects on sexual or vesicourethral function were low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed benefits from subtotal hysterectomy are not well proven. Total hysterectomy remains the procedure of choice for most women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1186-1192
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume176
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Hysterectomy
Gynecology
Hemorrhage
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Infection
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Morbidity
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Decision analysis
  • Subtotal hysterectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Scott, J. R., Sharp, H. T., Dodson, M. K., Norton, P. A., Warner, H. R., Huddleston, H. T., & Shepard, M. (1997). Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology: A decision analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176(6), 1186-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70333-8

Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology : A decision analysis. / Scott, J. R.; Sharp, H. T.; Dodson, M. K.; Norton, P. A.; Warner, H. R.; Huddleston, H. T.; Shepard, Marguerite.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 176, No. 6, 1997, p. 1186-1192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, JR, Sharp, HT, Dodson, MK, Norton, PA, Warner, HR, Huddleston, HT & Shepard, M 1997, 'Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology: A decision analysis', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 176, no. 6, pp. 1186-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70333-8
Scott, J. R. ; Sharp, H. T. ; Dodson, M. K. ; Norton, P. A. ; Warner, H. R. ; Huddleston, H. T. ; Shepard, Marguerite. / Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology : A decision analysis. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997 ; Vol. 176, No. 6. pp. 1186-1192.
@article{5f909423e26b4518872c774c7d92f8b0,
title = "Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology: A decision analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the risks and benefits of subtotal (supracervical) hysterectomy with those of total hysterectomy in women at low risk for cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analysis was performed. Baseline probabilities for operative and postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life were established for subtotal and total hysterectomy. RESULTS: Operative complication rates and ranges for total abdominal hysterectomy were infection 3.0{\%} (3.0{\%} to 20.0{\%}), hemorrhage 2.0{\%} (2.0{\%} to 15.4{\%}), and adjacent organ injury 1.0{\%} (0.7{\%} to 2.0{\%}). Those for subtotal hysterectomy were infection 1.4{\%} (1.0{\%} to 5.0{\%}), hemorrhage 2.0{\%} (0.7{\%} to 4.0{\%}), and adjacent organ injury 0.7{\%} (0.6{\%} to 1.0{\%}). Operative mortality, the risk for development of cervicovaginal cancer, and long-term adverse effects on sexual or vesicourethral function were low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed benefits from subtotal hysterectomy are not well proven. Total hysterectomy remains the procedure of choice for most women.",
keywords = "Decision analysis, Subtotal hysterectomy",
author = "Scott, {J. R.} and Sharp, {H. T.} and Dodson, {M. K.} and Norton, {P. A.} and Warner, {H. R.} and Huddleston, {H. T.} and Marguerite Shepard",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70333-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "1186--1192",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology

T2 - A decision analysis

AU - Scott, J. R.

AU - Sharp, H. T.

AU - Dodson, M. K.

AU - Norton, P. A.

AU - Warner, H. R.

AU - Huddleston, H. T.

AU - Shepard, Marguerite

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the risks and benefits of subtotal (supracervical) hysterectomy with those of total hysterectomy in women at low risk for cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analysis was performed. Baseline probabilities for operative and postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life were established for subtotal and total hysterectomy. RESULTS: Operative complication rates and ranges for total abdominal hysterectomy were infection 3.0% (3.0% to 20.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (2.0% to 15.4%), and adjacent organ injury 1.0% (0.7% to 2.0%). Those for subtotal hysterectomy were infection 1.4% (1.0% to 5.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (0.7% to 4.0%), and adjacent organ injury 0.7% (0.6% to 1.0%). Operative mortality, the risk for development of cervicovaginal cancer, and long-term adverse effects on sexual or vesicourethral function were low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed benefits from subtotal hysterectomy are not well proven. Total hysterectomy remains the procedure of choice for most women.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the risks and benefits of subtotal (supracervical) hysterectomy with those of total hysterectomy in women at low risk for cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analysis was performed. Baseline probabilities for operative and postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life were established for subtotal and total hysterectomy. RESULTS: Operative complication rates and ranges for total abdominal hysterectomy were infection 3.0% (3.0% to 20.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (2.0% to 15.4%), and adjacent organ injury 1.0% (0.7% to 2.0%). Those for subtotal hysterectomy were infection 1.4% (1.0% to 5.0%), hemorrhage 2.0% (0.7% to 4.0%), and adjacent organ injury 0.7% (0.6% to 1.0%). Operative mortality, the risk for development of cervicovaginal cancer, and long-term adverse effects on sexual or vesicourethral function were low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recently proposed benefits from subtotal hysterectomy are not well proven. Total hysterectomy remains the procedure of choice for most women.

KW - Decision analysis

KW - Subtotal hysterectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030743821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030743821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70333-8

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70333-8

M3 - Article

VL - 176

SP - 1186

EP - 1192

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -