SU‐E‐J‐161

Dynamic Gating Window for Compensation of Baseline Shift in Respiratory‐Gated Radiation Therapy

E. Pepin, Huanmei Wu, H. Shirato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze and evaluate the necessity and use of dynamic gating techniques for compensation of baseline shift during respiratory‐gated radiation therapy of lung tumors. Methods: Motion tracking data from 30 lung tumors over 592 treatment fractions were analyzed for baseline shift. The finite state model (FSM) was used to identify the end‐of‐exhale (EOE) breathing phase throughout each treatment fraction. Using duty cycle as an evaluation metric, several methods of end‐of‐exhale dynamic gating were compared: An a posteriori ideal gating window, a predictive trend‐line‐ based gating window, and a predictive weighted point‐based gating window. These methods were evaluated for each of several gating window types: Superior/inferior (SI) gating, anterior/posterior beam, lateral beam, and 3D gating. Results: In the absence of dynamic gating techniques, SI gating gave a 39.6% duty cycle. The ideal SI gating window yielded a 41.5% duty cycle. The weight‐based method of dynamic SI gating yielded a duty cycle of 36.2%. The trend‐line‐based method yielded a duty cycle of 34.0%. Conclusions: Dynamic gating was not broadly beneficial due to a breakdown of the FSM's ability to identify the EOE phase. When the EOE phase was well defined, dynamic gating showed an improvement over static‐window gating.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Lung
Neoplasms
Respiration
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐J‐161 : Dynamic Gating Window for Compensation of Baseline Shift in Respiratory‐Gated Radiation Therapy. / Pepin, E.; Wu, Huanmei; Shirato, H.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9429856b3ec9485b83c41b75b8e6d76d,
title = "SU‐E‐J‐161: Dynamic Gating Window for Compensation of Baseline Shift in Respiratory‐Gated Radiation Therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: To analyze and evaluate the necessity and use of dynamic gating techniques for compensation of baseline shift during respiratory‐gated radiation therapy of lung tumors. Methods: Motion tracking data from 30 lung tumors over 592 treatment fractions were analyzed for baseline shift. The finite state model (FSM) was used to identify the end‐of‐exhale (EOE) breathing phase throughout each treatment fraction. Using duty cycle as an evaluation metric, several methods of end‐of‐exhale dynamic gating were compared: An a posteriori ideal gating window, a predictive trend‐line‐ based gating window, and a predictive weighted point‐based gating window. These methods were evaluated for each of several gating window types: Superior/inferior (SI) gating, anterior/posterior beam, lateral beam, and 3D gating. Results: In the absence of dynamic gating techniques, SI gating gave a 39.6{\%} duty cycle. The ideal SI gating window yielded a 41.5{\%} duty cycle. The weight‐based method of dynamic SI gating yielded a duty cycle of 36.2{\%}. The trend‐line‐based method yielded a duty cycle of 34.0{\%}. Conclusions: Dynamic gating was not broadly beneficial due to a breakdown of the FSM's ability to identify the EOE phase. When the EOE phase was well defined, dynamic gating showed an improvement over static‐window gating.",
author = "E. Pepin and Huanmei Wu and H. Shirato",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3611929",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐J‐161

T2 - Dynamic Gating Window for Compensation of Baseline Shift in Respiratory‐Gated Radiation Therapy

AU - Pepin, E.

AU - Wu, Huanmei

AU - Shirato, H.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To analyze and evaluate the necessity and use of dynamic gating techniques for compensation of baseline shift during respiratory‐gated radiation therapy of lung tumors. Methods: Motion tracking data from 30 lung tumors over 592 treatment fractions were analyzed for baseline shift. The finite state model (FSM) was used to identify the end‐of‐exhale (EOE) breathing phase throughout each treatment fraction. Using duty cycle as an evaluation metric, several methods of end‐of‐exhale dynamic gating were compared: An a posteriori ideal gating window, a predictive trend‐line‐ based gating window, and a predictive weighted point‐based gating window. These methods were evaluated for each of several gating window types: Superior/inferior (SI) gating, anterior/posterior beam, lateral beam, and 3D gating. Results: In the absence of dynamic gating techniques, SI gating gave a 39.6% duty cycle. The ideal SI gating window yielded a 41.5% duty cycle. The weight‐based method of dynamic SI gating yielded a duty cycle of 36.2%. The trend‐line‐based method yielded a duty cycle of 34.0%. Conclusions: Dynamic gating was not broadly beneficial due to a breakdown of the FSM's ability to identify the EOE phase. When the EOE phase was well defined, dynamic gating showed an improvement over static‐window gating.

AB - Purpose: To analyze and evaluate the necessity and use of dynamic gating techniques for compensation of baseline shift during respiratory‐gated radiation therapy of lung tumors. Methods: Motion tracking data from 30 lung tumors over 592 treatment fractions were analyzed for baseline shift. The finite state model (FSM) was used to identify the end‐of‐exhale (EOE) breathing phase throughout each treatment fraction. Using duty cycle as an evaluation metric, several methods of end‐of‐exhale dynamic gating were compared: An a posteriori ideal gating window, a predictive trend‐line‐ based gating window, and a predictive weighted point‐based gating window. These methods were evaluated for each of several gating window types: Superior/inferior (SI) gating, anterior/posterior beam, lateral beam, and 3D gating. Results: In the absence of dynamic gating techniques, SI gating gave a 39.6% duty cycle. The ideal SI gating window yielded a 41.5% duty cycle. The weight‐based method of dynamic SI gating yielded a duty cycle of 36.2%. The trend‐line‐based method yielded a duty cycle of 34.0%. Conclusions: Dynamic gating was not broadly beneficial due to a breakdown of the FSM's ability to identify the EOE phase. When the EOE phase was well defined, dynamic gating showed an improvement over static‐window gating.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024787375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024787375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3611929

DO - 10.1118/1.3611929

M3 - Article

VL - 38

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -