SU‐E‐T‐668: Feasibility Study of Prostate Seed Implant with Intensity Modulated Proton Boost

J. wu, C. Cheng, Huanmei Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been widely used to deliver boost doses after permanent prostate seed implant (PSI). In this study, we tested the feasibility of EBRT boost with Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the presence of a large number of high Z metallic seeds. The dosimetric effect caused by implanted high density prostate seeds in spot scanned proton beam boost treatment was analyzed. IMPT boost plans were also compared with conventional Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) boost plans. Method: Post prostate seed implants with seeds of I‐125 and Pd‐103 were tested in this study. The post PSI CT scans were processed at a slice thickness of 1mm. Proton treatment plans were created with two lateral beams in Eclipse treatment planning system. IMRT boost plans were generated with seven co‐planner beams. The calculation grids were set up at 1mm. Extreme cases with prostate seeds close to each other and prostate seed drift were also analyzed. Results: Higher density PSI seeds did not show significant effect on dose distributions in IMPT plans. Compared to conventional IMRT boost plans, IMPT has better sparing of rectum and bladder, while providing the same PTV coverage. The mean rectal dose decreases from 32.5% for IMRT to 22.4% for IMPT of the prescribed doses. The mean bladder dose decreases from 28.3% (IMRT) to 24.9% (IMPT) of the prescribed doses. The spot scanned proton beam provides an improved boost plan to different cold spots of suboptimal dose coverage PSI. Conclusion: PSI with an IMPT boost can be a valuable tool for prostate cancer patient treatment. It delivers better plan in terms of normal tissue sparing compared to IMRT boost plan. The high density seeds have no effect on the proton distribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
Protons
Prostate
Seeds
Proton Therapy
Radiotherapy
Urinary Bladder
Therapeutics
Rectum
Prostatic Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐668 : Feasibility Study of Prostate Seed Implant with Intensity Modulated Proton Boost. / wu, J.; Cheng, C.; Wu, Huanmei.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b95402b20ea441a8b3c3899a622a720,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐668: Feasibility Study of Prostate Seed Implant with Intensity Modulated Proton Boost",
abstract = "Purpose: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been widely used to deliver boost doses after permanent prostate seed implant (PSI). In this study, we tested the feasibility of EBRT boost with Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the presence of a large number of high Z metallic seeds. The dosimetric effect caused by implanted high density prostate seeds in spot scanned proton beam boost treatment was analyzed. IMPT boost plans were also compared with conventional Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) boost plans. Method: Post prostate seed implants with seeds of I‐125 and Pd‐103 were tested in this study. The post PSI CT scans were processed at a slice thickness of 1mm. Proton treatment plans were created with two lateral beams in Eclipse treatment planning system. IMRT boost plans were generated with seven co‐planner beams. The calculation grids were set up at 1mm. Extreme cases with prostate seeds close to each other and prostate seed drift were also analyzed. Results: Higher density PSI seeds did not show significant effect on dose distributions in IMPT plans. Compared to conventional IMRT boost plans, IMPT has better sparing of rectum and bladder, while providing the same PTV coverage. The mean rectal dose decreases from 32.5{\%} for IMRT to 22.4{\%} for IMPT of the prescribed doses. The mean bladder dose decreases from 28.3{\%} (IMRT) to 24.9{\%} (IMPT) of the prescribed doses. The spot scanned proton beam provides an improved boost plan to different cold spots of suboptimal dose coverage PSI. Conclusion: PSI with an IMPT boost can be a valuable tool for prostate cancer patient treatment. It delivers better plan in terms of normal tissue sparing compared to IMRT boost plan. The high density seeds have no effect on the proton distribution.",
author = "J. wu and C. Cheng and Huanmei Wu",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.4815095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐668

T2 - Feasibility Study of Prostate Seed Implant with Intensity Modulated Proton Boost

AU - wu, J.

AU - Cheng, C.

AU - Wu, Huanmei

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Purpose: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been widely used to deliver boost doses after permanent prostate seed implant (PSI). In this study, we tested the feasibility of EBRT boost with Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the presence of a large number of high Z metallic seeds. The dosimetric effect caused by implanted high density prostate seeds in spot scanned proton beam boost treatment was analyzed. IMPT boost plans were also compared with conventional Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) boost plans. Method: Post prostate seed implants with seeds of I‐125 and Pd‐103 were tested in this study. The post PSI CT scans were processed at a slice thickness of 1mm. Proton treatment plans were created with two lateral beams in Eclipse treatment planning system. IMRT boost plans were generated with seven co‐planner beams. The calculation grids were set up at 1mm. Extreme cases with prostate seeds close to each other and prostate seed drift were also analyzed. Results: Higher density PSI seeds did not show significant effect on dose distributions in IMPT plans. Compared to conventional IMRT boost plans, IMPT has better sparing of rectum and bladder, while providing the same PTV coverage. The mean rectal dose decreases from 32.5% for IMRT to 22.4% for IMPT of the prescribed doses. The mean bladder dose decreases from 28.3% (IMRT) to 24.9% (IMPT) of the prescribed doses. The spot scanned proton beam provides an improved boost plan to different cold spots of suboptimal dose coverage PSI. Conclusion: PSI with an IMPT boost can be a valuable tool for prostate cancer patient treatment. It delivers better plan in terms of normal tissue sparing compared to IMRT boost plan. The high density seeds have no effect on the proton distribution.

AB - Purpose: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has been widely used to deliver boost doses after permanent prostate seed implant (PSI). In this study, we tested the feasibility of EBRT boost with Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the presence of a large number of high Z metallic seeds. The dosimetric effect caused by implanted high density prostate seeds in spot scanned proton beam boost treatment was analyzed. IMPT boost plans were also compared with conventional Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) boost plans. Method: Post prostate seed implants with seeds of I‐125 and Pd‐103 were tested in this study. The post PSI CT scans were processed at a slice thickness of 1mm. Proton treatment plans were created with two lateral beams in Eclipse treatment planning system. IMRT boost plans were generated with seven co‐planner beams. The calculation grids were set up at 1mm. Extreme cases with prostate seeds close to each other and prostate seed drift were also analyzed. Results: Higher density PSI seeds did not show significant effect on dose distributions in IMPT plans. Compared to conventional IMRT boost plans, IMPT has better sparing of rectum and bladder, while providing the same PTV coverage. The mean rectal dose decreases from 32.5% for IMRT to 22.4% for IMPT of the prescribed doses. The mean bladder dose decreases from 28.3% (IMRT) to 24.9% (IMPT) of the prescribed doses. The spot scanned proton beam provides an improved boost plan to different cold spots of suboptimal dose coverage PSI. Conclusion: PSI with an IMPT boost can be a valuable tool for prostate cancer patient treatment. It delivers better plan in terms of normal tissue sparing compared to IMRT boost plan. The high density seeds have no effect on the proton distribution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024801118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024801118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4815095

DO - 10.1118/1.4815095

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024801118

VL - 40

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -