SU‐FF‐T‐152: Convolution/superposition Algorithm and High‐Z Dental Materials: Dosimetric Study in a Solid Water Slab Phantom

S. Spirydovich, L. Papiez, Mark Langer, V. Thai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose To address the accuracy of the dose calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm in the presence of high‐Z dental materials. Methods and Materials Three methods were utilized to access the dose: convolution/superposition algorithm, Fluence Map Monte Carlo (FMMC) method, and radiochromic film. We considered a solid water® slab phantom which had an embedded high‐Z material. For dose calculations and measurements we used a 6MV photon beam from a clinically commissioned linear accelerator. Results We observed a close agreement for the dose measured with radiochromic film and the dose calculated with FMMC algorithm. On the other hand, a large discrepancy was discovered for the dose calculated with the convolution/superposition algorithm compared to the dose obtained with measurement or FMMC algorithm. The greatest discrepancy was observed downstream from the high‐Z cerrobend inhomogeneity where the convolution/superposition algorithm calculated a dose which was higher than the dose measured with radiochromic film by 10–20% depending on the size of and the distance from the inhomogeneity. Clinically this finding shows that the delivered dose would be 10– 20% less than the prescribed dose which was calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm. In the region upstream from all the studied high‐Z inhomogeneities the convolution/superposition algorithm was underestimating the delivered dose. The convolution/superposition algorithm was unable to properly estimate the dose enhancement due to the increased backscatter near the inhomogeneity. Conclusions The convolution/superposition algorithm may significantly overestimate the actual dose in the site of the tumor located downstream from the high‐Z dental restorations or prostheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2083-2084
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Dental Materials
Water
Monte Carlo Method
Particle Accelerators
Photons
Prostheses and Implants
Tooth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐T‐152 : Convolution/superposition Algorithm and High‐Z Dental Materials: Dosimetric Study in a Solid Water Slab Phantom. / Spirydovich, S.; Papiez, L.; Langer, Mark; Thai, V.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.01.2006, p. 2083-2084.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9635cda97eb54d23b0fd004c090a2680,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐152: Convolution/superposition Algorithm and High‐Z Dental Materials: Dosimetric Study in a Solid Water Slab Phantom",
abstract = "Purpose To address the accuracy of the dose calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm in the presence of high‐Z dental materials. Methods and Materials Three methods were utilized to access the dose: convolution/superposition algorithm, Fluence Map Monte Carlo (FMMC) method, and radiochromic film. We considered a solid water{\circledR} slab phantom which had an embedded high‐Z material. For dose calculations and measurements we used a 6MV photon beam from a clinically commissioned linear accelerator. Results We observed a close agreement for the dose measured with radiochromic film and the dose calculated with FMMC algorithm. On the other hand, a large discrepancy was discovered for the dose calculated with the convolution/superposition algorithm compared to the dose obtained with measurement or FMMC algorithm. The greatest discrepancy was observed downstream from the high‐Z cerrobend inhomogeneity where the convolution/superposition algorithm calculated a dose which was higher than the dose measured with radiochromic film by 10–20{\%} depending on the size of and the distance from the inhomogeneity. Clinically this finding shows that the delivered dose would be 10– 20{\%} less than the prescribed dose which was calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm. In the region upstream from all the studied high‐Z inhomogeneities the convolution/superposition algorithm was underestimating the delivered dose. The convolution/superposition algorithm was unable to properly estimate the dose enhancement due to the increased backscatter near the inhomogeneity. Conclusions The convolution/superposition algorithm may significantly overestimate the actual dose in the site of the tumor located downstream from the high‐Z dental restorations or prostheses.",
author = "S. Spirydovich and L. Papiez and Mark Langer and V. Thai",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.2241076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "2083--2084",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐152

T2 - Convolution/superposition Algorithm and High‐Z Dental Materials: Dosimetric Study in a Solid Water Slab Phantom

AU - Spirydovich, S.

AU - Papiez, L.

AU - Langer, Mark

AU - Thai, V.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Purpose To address the accuracy of the dose calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm in the presence of high‐Z dental materials. Methods and Materials Three methods were utilized to access the dose: convolution/superposition algorithm, Fluence Map Monte Carlo (FMMC) method, and radiochromic film. We considered a solid water® slab phantom which had an embedded high‐Z material. For dose calculations and measurements we used a 6MV photon beam from a clinically commissioned linear accelerator. Results We observed a close agreement for the dose measured with radiochromic film and the dose calculated with FMMC algorithm. On the other hand, a large discrepancy was discovered for the dose calculated with the convolution/superposition algorithm compared to the dose obtained with measurement or FMMC algorithm. The greatest discrepancy was observed downstream from the high‐Z cerrobend inhomogeneity where the convolution/superposition algorithm calculated a dose which was higher than the dose measured with radiochromic film by 10–20% depending on the size of and the distance from the inhomogeneity. Clinically this finding shows that the delivered dose would be 10– 20% less than the prescribed dose which was calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm. In the region upstream from all the studied high‐Z inhomogeneities the convolution/superposition algorithm was underestimating the delivered dose. The convolution/superposition algorithm was unable to properly estimate the dose enhancement due to the increased backscatter near the inhomogeneity. Conclusions The convolution/superposition algorithm may significantly overestimate the actual dose in the site of the tumor located downstream from the high‐Z dental restorations or prostheses.

AB - Purpose To address the accuracy of the dose calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm in the presence of high‐Z dental materials. Methods and Materials Three methods were utilized to access the dose: convolution/superposition algorithm, Fluence Map Monte Carlo (FMMC) method, and radiochromic film. We considered a solid water® slab phantom which had an embedded high‐Z material. For dose calculations and measurements we used a 6MV photon beam from a clinically commissioned linear accelerator. Results We observed a close agreement for the dose measured with radiochromic film and the dose calculated with FMMC algorithm. On the other hand, a large discrepancy was discovered for the dose calculated with the convolution/superposition algorithm compared to the dose obtained with measurement or FMMC algorithm. The greatest discrepancy was observed downstream from the high‐Z cerrobend inhomogeneity where the convolution/superposition algorithm calculated a dose which was higher than the dose measured with radiochromic film by 10–20% depending on the size of and the distance from the inhomogeneity. Clinically this finding shows that the delivered dose would be 10– 20% less than the prescribed dose which was calculated with convolution/superposition algorithm. In the region upstream from all the studied high‐Z inhomogeneities the convolution/superposition algorithm was underestimating the delivered dose. The convolution/superposition algorithm was unable to properly estimate the dose enhancement due to the increased backscatter near the inhomogeneity. Conclusions The convolution/superposition algorithm may significantly overestimate the actual dose in the site of the tumor located downstream from the high‐Z dental restorations or prostheses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024786666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024786666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2241076

DO - 10.1118/1.2241076

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024786666

VL - 33

SP - 2083

EP - 2084

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -