Surgeon information transfer and communication

Factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care

Reed G. Williams, Ross Silverman, Cathy Schwind, John B. Fortune, John Sutyak, Karen D. Horvath, Erik G. Van Eaton, Georges Azzie, John R. Potts, Margaret Boehler, Gary Dunnington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature of surgeon information transfer and communication (ITC) errors that lead to adverse events and near misses. To recommend strategies for minimizing or preventing these errors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical hospital practice is changing from a single provider to a team-based approach. This has put a premium on effective ITC. The Information Transfer and Communication Practices (ITCP) Project is a multi-institutional effort to: 1) better understand surgeon ITCP and their patient care consequences, 2) determine what has been done to improve ITCP in other professions, and 3) recommend ways to improve these practices among surgeons. METHODS: Separate, semi-structured focus group sessions were conducted with surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgical nurses (n = 42) at 5 medical centers. Case descriptions and general comments were classified by the nature of ITC lapses and their effects on patients and medical care. Information learned was combined with a review of ITC strategies in other professions to develop principles and guidelines for re-engineering surgeon ITCP. RESULTS: A total of 328 case descriptions and general comments were obtained and classified. Incidents fell into 4 areas: blurred boundaries of responsibility (87 reports), decreased surgeon familiarity with patients (123 reports), diversion of surgeon attention (31 reports), and distorted or inhibited communication (67 reports). Results were subdivided into 30 contributing factors (eg, shift change, location change, number of providers). Consequences of ITC lapses included delays in patient care (77% of cases), wasted surgeon/staff time (48%), and serious adverse patient consequences (31%). Twelve principles and 5 institutional habit changes are recommended to guide ITCP re-engineering. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon communication lapses are significant contributors to adverse patient consequences, and provider inefficiency. Re-engineering ITCP will require significant cultural changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-169
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume245
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transfer Factor
Inpatients
Communication
Efficiency
Patient Care
Surgeons
Transfer (Psychology)
Focus Groups
Habits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgeon information transfer and communication : Factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care. / Williams, Reed G.; Silverman, Ross; Schwind, Cathy; Fortune, John B.; Sutyak, John; Horvath, Karen D.; Van Eaton, Erik G.; Azzie, Georges; Potts, John R.; Boehler, Margaret; Dunnington, Gary.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 245, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 159-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, RG, Silverman, R, Schwind, C, Fortune, JB, Sutyak, J, Horvath, KD, Van Eaton, EG, Azzie, G, Potts, JR, Boehler, M & Dunnington, G 2007, 'Surgeon information transfer and communication: Factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care', Annals of Surgery, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000242709.28760.56
Williams, Reed G. ; Silverman, Ross ; Schwind, Cathy ; Fortune, John B. ; Sutyak, John ; Horvath, Karen D. ; Van Eaton, Erik G. ; Azzie, Georges ; Potts, John R. ; Boehler, Margaret ; Dunnington, Gary. / Surgeon information transfer and communication : Factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care. In: Annals of Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 245, No. 2. pp. 159-169.
@article{ac8ff5882c354389b9bdf51c079a4c6c,
title = "Surgeon information transfer and communication: Factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature of surgeon information transfer and communication (ITC) errors that lead to adverse events and near misses. To recommend strategies for minimizing or preventing these errors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical hospital practice is changing from a single provider to a team-based approach. This has put a premium on effective ITC. The Information Transfer and Communication Practices (ITCP) Project is a multi-institutional effort to: 1) better understand surgeon ITCP and their patient care consequences, 2) determine what has been done to improve ITCP in other professions, and 3) recommend ways to improve these practices among surgeons. METHODS: Separate, semi-structured focus group sessions were conducted with surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgical nurses (n = 42) at 5 medical centers. Case descriptions and general comments were classified by the nature of ITC lapses and their effects on patients and medical care. Information learned was combined with a review of ITC strategies in other professions to develop principles and guidelines for re-engineering surgeon ITCP. RESULTS: A total of 328 case descriptions and general comments were obtained and classified. Incidents fell into 4 areas: blurred boundaries of responsibility (87 reports), decreased surgeon familiarity with patients (123 reports), diversion of surgeon attention (31 reports), and distorted or inhibited communication (67 reports). Results were subdivided into 30 contributing factors (eg, shift change, location change, number of providers). Consequences of ITC lapses included delays in patient care (77{\%} of cases), wasted surgeon/staff time (48{\%}), and serious adverse patient consequences (31{\%}). Twelve principles and 5 institutional habit changes are recommended to guide ITCP re-engineering. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon communication lapses are significant contributors to adverse patient consequences, and provider inefficiency. Re-engineering ITCP will require significant cultural changes.",
author = "Williams, {Reed G.} and Ross Silverman and Cathy Schwind and Fortune, {John B.} and John Sutyak and Horvath, {Karen D.} and {Van Eaton}, {Erik G.} and Georges Azzie and Potts, {John R.} and Margaret Boehler and Gary Dunnington",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/01.sla.0000242709.28760.56",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "245",
pages = "159--169",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgeon information transfer and communication

T2 - Factors affecting quality and efficiency of inpatient care

AU - Williams, Reed G.

AU - Silverman, Ross

AU - Schwind, Cathy

AU - Fortune, John B.

AU - Sutyak, John

AU - Horvath, Karen D.

AU - Van Eaton, Erik G.

AU - Azzie, Georges

AU - Potts, John R.

AU - Boehler, Margaret

AU - Dunnington, Gary

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature of surgeon information transfer and communication (ITC) errors that lead to adverse events and near misses. To recommend strategies for minimizing or preventing these errors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical hospital practice is changing from a single provider to a team-based approach. This has put a premium on effective ITC. The Information Transfer and Communication Practices (ITCP) Project is a multi-institutional effort to: 1) better understand surgeon ITCP and their patient care consequences, 2) determine what has been done to improve ITCP in other professions, and 3) recommend ways to improve these practices among surgeons. METHODS: Separate, semi-structured focus group sessions were conducted with surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgical nurses (n = 42) at 5 medical centers. Case descriptions and general comments were classified by the nature of ITC lapses and their effects on patients and medical care. Information learned was combined with a review of ITC strategies in other professions to develop principles and guidelines for re-engineering surgeon ITCP. RESULTS: A total of 328 case descriptions and general comments were obtained and classified. Incidents fell into 4 areas: blurred boundaries of responsibility (87 reports), decreased surgeon familiarity with patients (123 reports), diversion of surgeon attention (31 reports), and distorted or inhibited communication (67 reports). Results were subdivided into 30 contributing factors (eg, shift change, location change, number of providers). Consequences of ITC lapses included delays in patient care (77% of cases), wasted surgeon/staff time (48%), and serious adverse patient consequences (31%). Twelve principles and 5 institutional habit changes are recommended to guide ITCP re-engineering. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon communication lapses are significant contributors to adverse patient consequences, and provider inefficiency. Re-engineering ITCP will require significant cultural changes.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature of surgeon information transfer and communication (ITC) errors that lead to adverse events and near misses. To recommend strategies for minimizing or preventing these errors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical hospital practice is changing from a single provider to a team-based approach. This has put a premium on effective ITC. The Information Transfer and Communication Practices (ITCP) Project is a multi-institutional effort to: 1) better understand surgeon ITCP and their patient care consequences, 2) determine what has been done to improve ITCP in other professions, and 3) recommend ways to improve these practices among surgeons. METHODS: Separate, semi-structured focus group sessions were conducted with surgical residents (n = 59), general surgery attending physicians (n = 36), and surgical nurses (n = 42) at 5 medical centers. Case descriptions and general comments were classified by the nature of ITC lapses and their effects on patients and medical care. Information learned was combined with a review of ITC strategies in other professions to develop principles and guidelines for re-engineering surgeon ITCP. RESULTS: A total of 328 case descriptions and general comments were obtained and classified. Incidents fell into 4 areas: blurred boundaries of responsibility (87 reports), decreased surgeon familiarity with patients (123 reports), diversion of surgeon attention (31 reports), and distorted or inhibited communication (67 reports). Results were subdivided into 30 contributing factors (eg, shift change, location change, number of providers). Consequences of ITC lapses included delays in patient care (77% of cases), wasted surgeon/staff time (48%), and serious adverse patient consequences (31%). Twelve principles and 5 institutional habit changes are recommended to guide ITCP re-engineering. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon communication lapses are significant contributors to adverse patient consequences, and provider inefficiency. Re-engineering ITCP will require significant cultural changes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846444353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846444353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sla.0000242709.28760.56

DO - 10.1097/01.sla.0000242709.28760.56

M3 - Article

VL - 245

SP - 159

EP - 169

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 2

ER -