Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages: Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery

Umit Eroglu, Gokmen Kahilogullari, Ihsan Dogan, Fatih Yakar, Eyyub S.M. Al-Beyati, Onur Ozgural, Aaron Cohen-Gadol, Hasan Caglar Ugur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Intracerebral hemorrhage continues to be a major global problem. No standard treatment or surgical procedure has been identified for intracerebral hemorrhages. High morbidity and mortality rates caused by conventional approaches and the disease itself have necessitated more-invasive treatment methods. The endoscopic approach is a more minimally invasive method than craniotomy, which is another alternative surgical treatment. Methods: We compared intracerebral hematoma drainage in 2 groups of 17 patients each, treated with minimally invasive endoscopic method versus craniotomy. All the patients were treated for supratentorial spontaneous hemorrhage between December 2013 and February 2017 at the Neurosurgery Clinic of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients surgically treated between December 2013 and February 2017. All patients underwent surgery within the first 24 hours. Patients in the early surgery group had better surgical outcomes. In the neuroendoscopic group, Glasgow Coma Scale increased from 6 to 11 at 1 week postoperatively compared with 5 to 9 in the craniotomy group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation may be a good alternative surgical method for treating supratentorial spontaneous cerebral hematomas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Cerebral Hemorrhage
Craniotomy
Hematoma
Glasgow Coma Scale
Neurosurgery
Drainage
Therapeutics
Medicine
Hemorrhage
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • Craniotomy
  • Endoscopic surgery
  • Hematoma evacuation
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Eroglu, U., Kahilogullari, G., Dogan, I., Yakar, F., Al-Beyati, E. S. M., Ozgural, O., ... Ugur, H. C. (Accepted/In press). Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages: Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery. World Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.056

Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages : Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery. / Eroglu, Umit; Kahilogullari, Gokmen; Dogan, Ihsan; Yakar, Fatih; Al-Beyati, Eyyub S.M.; Ozgural, Onur; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron; Ugur, Hasan Caglar.

In: World Neurosurgery, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eroglu, Umit ; Kahilogullari, Gokmen ; Dogan, Ihsan ; Yakar, Fatih ; Al-Beyati, Eyyub S.M. ; Ozgural, Onur ; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron ; Ugur, Hasan Caglar. / Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages : Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery. In: World Neurosurgery. 2018.
@article{de12988f65de4e86bc3a7aba54441871,
title = "Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages: Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery",
abstract = "Objective: Intracerebral hemorrhage continues to be a major global problem. No standard treatment or surgical procedure has been identified for intracerebral hemorrhages. High morbidity and mortality rates caused by conventional approaches and the disease itself have necessitated more-invasive treatment methods. The endoscopic approach is a more minimally invasive method than craniotomy, which is another alternative surgical treatment. Methods: We compared intracerebral hematoma drainage in 2 groups of 17 patients each, treated with minimally invasive endoscopic method versus craniotomy. All the patients were treated for supratentorial spontaneous hemorrhage between December 2013 and February 2017 at the Neurosurgery Clinic of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients surgically treated between December 2013 and February 2017. All patients underwent surgery within the first 24 hours. Patients in the early surgery group had better surgical outcomes. In the neuroendoscopic group, Glasgow Coma Scale increased from 6 to 11 at 1 week postoperatively compared with 5 to 9 in the craniotomy group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation may be a good alternative surgical method for treating supratentorial spontaneous cerebral hematomas.",
keywords = "Craniotomy, Endoscopic surgery, Hematoma evacuation, Intracerebral hemorrhage",
author = "Umit Eroglu and Gokmen Kahilogullari and Ihsan Dogan and Fatih Yakar and Al-Beyati, {Eyyub S.M.} and Onur Ozgural and Aaron Cohen-Gadol and Ugur, {Hasan Caglar}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.056",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical Management of Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages

T2 - Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery

AU - Eroglu, Umit

AU - Kahilogullari, Gokmen

AU - Dogan, Ihsan

AU - Yakar, Fatih

AU - Al-Beyati, Eyyub S.M.

AU - Ozgural, Onur

AU - Cohen-Gadol, Aaron

AU - Ugur, Hasan Caglar

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Intracerebral hemorrhage continues to be a major global problem. No standard treatment or surgical procedure has been identified for intracerebral hemorrhages. High morbidity and mortality rates caused by conventional approaches and the disease itself have necessitated more-invasive treatment methods. The endoscopic approach is a more minimally invasive method than craniotomy, which is another alternative surgical treatment. Methods: We compared intracerebral hematoma drainage in 2 groups of 17 patients each, treated with minimally invasive endoscopic method versus craniotomy. All the patients were treated for supratentorial spontaneous hemorrhage between December 2013 and February 2017 at the Neurosurgery Clinic of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients surgically treated between December 2013 and February 2017. All patients underwent surgery within the first 24 hours. Patients in the early surgery group had better surgical outcomes. In the neuroendoscopic group, Glasgow Coma Scale increased from 6 to 11 at 1 week postoperatively compared with 5 to 9 in the craniotomy group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation may be a good alternative surgical method for treating supratentorial spontaneous cerebral hematomas.

AB - Objective: Intracerebral hemorrhage continues to be a major global problem. No standard treatment or surgical procedure has been identified for intracerebral hemorrhages. High morbidity and mortality rates caused by conventional approaches and the disease itself have necessitated more-invasive treatment methods. The endoscopic approach is a more minimally invasive method than craniotomy, which is another alternative surgical treatment. Methods: We compared intracerebral hematoma drainage in 2 groups of 17 patients each, treated with minimally invasive endoscopic method versus craniotomy. All the patients were treated for supratentorial spontaneous hemorrhage between December 2013 and February 2017 at the Neurosurgery Clinic of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 34 patients surgically treated between December 2013 and February 2017. All patients underwent surgery within the first 24 hours. Patients in the early surgery group had better surgical outcomes. In the neuroendoscopic group, Glasgow Coma Scale increased from 6 to 11 at 1 week postoperatively compared with 5 to 9 in the craniotomy group. Conclusions: Minimally invasive endoscopic hematoma evacuation may be a good alternative surgical method for treating supratentorial spontaneous cerebral hematomas.

KW - Craniotomy

KW - Endoscopic surgery

KW - Hematoma evacuation

KW - Intracerebral hemorrhage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045082930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045082930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.056

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.056

M3 - Article

C2 - 29567287

AN - SCOPUS:85045082930

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

ER -