Surgical treatment of obstructive pancreatitis

Thomas J. Howard, Cindy L. Maiden, Howard G. Smith, Eric A. Wiebke, Stuart Sherman, Glen A. Lehman, James A. Madura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Unlike chronic calcific pancreatitis, obstructive pancreatitis occurs as a consequence of an obstruction or stricture in the main pancreatic duct. The purpose of this paper is to identify the best method of surgical treatment for patients with obstructive pancreatitis. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 224 patients surgically treated for chronic pancreatitis during a 7-year period (1988 through 1994) identified 23 patients with obstructive pancreatitis. Patients were classified by surgical treatment into pancreaticoduodenectomy (five patients), side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (nine patients), or distal pancreatectomy (nine patients) groups and analyzed. Results. Despite similar demographics, patients treated with distal pancreatectomy had significantly better outcomes (seven of nine) than those treated with either pancreaticoduodenectomy (zero of four) or side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (two of eight) at a mean follow-up of 26 months (chi-squared, p=0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed stricture location, cause of pancreatitis, maximal duct dilatation, exocrine insufficiency, or continued alcohol intake had no influence on surgical outcome in this series (p=0.698, logistic regression analysis). Conclusions. At 2 years of follow-up, distal pancreatectomy provided superior relief from pain and recurrent pancreatitis compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy or side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy. Obstructive pancreatitis is best treated by distal rather than proximal pancreatic resection or drainage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)727-735
Number of pages9
JournalSurgery
Volume118
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1995

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this