Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window

Perry J. Williams, Nathan J. Engbrecht, Joseph R. Robb, Vanessa C K Terrell, Michael Lannoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Crawfish Frogs (Lithobates areolatus) are a relatively widespread but understudied North American species suspected to be in steep decline. Discussions to petition this species for federal listing have begun and therefore effective techniques to survey and monitor populations must be developed. Crawfish Frogs produce unusually loud breeding calls, making call surveys the most efficient way to assess populations; however, their peak breeding period lasts for only a few nights, sometimes for only one night. We used automated calling survey techniques at two wetlands where the numbers of Crawfish Frog males present were known (±1%) for the entire length of the breeding season to examine detection probabilities in relation to season, time of day, weather variables, survey duration, and the numbers of males present. We then used these data to ask three simple but important questions: 1) When should researchers listen-that is, what times and under what environmental conditions should surveys for Crawfish Frogs take place? 2) How long should surveys last? and 3) What can call surveys tell us about the size of a population? The most supported model for detection included the quadratic relationship of time and date, a positive linear relationship with temperature, and a negative linear relationship with recent rain, while the most supported model for estimating abundance included the quadratic relationship of time and date, and call rate. Five-minute surveys should suffice during peak breeding for known large populations; 15-minute surveys with repeat visits should be used for small populations or when sampling new areas. These findings should improve manually collected (auditory) call survey efficiencies for Crawfish Frogs, surveys that are being organized to provide the first objective data on the status of this species across its range.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-561
Number of pages10
JournalCopeia
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

amphibian
surveying
amphibians
crayfish
frog
frogs
breeding
detection
Lithobates
breeding season
wetlands
population size
weather
researchers
environmental conditions
wetland
rain
environmental factors
duration
monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Williams, P. J., Engbrecht, N. J., Robb, J. R., Terrell, V. C. K., & Lannoo, M. (2013). Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window. Copeia, (3), 552-561. https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-12-157

Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window. / Williams, Perry J.; Engbrecht, Nathan J.; Robb, Joseph R.; Terrell, Vanessa C K; Lannoo, Michael.

In: Copeia, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 552-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, PJ, Engbrecht, NJ, Robb, JR, Terrell, VCK & Lannoo, M 2013, 'Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window', Copeia, no. 3, pp. 552-561. https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-12-157
Williams, Perry J. ; Engbrecht, Nathan J. ; Robb, Joseph R. ; Terrell, Vanessa C K ; Lannoo, Michael. / Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window. In: Copeia. 2013 ; No. 3. pp. 552-561.
@article{1ae81aae10ab4345a60257a998ccdec3,
title = "Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window",
abstract = "Crawfish Frogs (Lithobates areolatus) are a relatively widespread but understudied North American species suspected to be in steep decline. Discussions to petition this species for federal listing have begun and therefore effective techniques to survey and monitor populations must be developed. Crawfish Frogs produce unusually loud breeding calls, making call surveys the most efficient way to assess populations; however, their peak breeding period lasts for only a few nights, sometimes for only one night. We used automated calling survey techniques at two wetlands where the numbers of Crawfish Frog males present were known (±1{\%}) for the entire length of the breeding season to examine detection probabilities in relation to season, time of day, weather variables, survey duration, and the numbers of males present. We then used these data to ask three simple but important questions: 1) When should researchers listen-that is, what times and under what environmental conditions should surveys for Crawfish Frogs take place? 2) How long should surveys last? and 3) What can call surveys tell us about the size of a population? The most supported model for detection included the quadratic relationship of time and date, a positive linear relationship with temperature, and a negative linear relationship with recent rain, while the most supported model for estimating abundance included the quadratic relationship of time and date, and call rate. Five-minute surveys should suffice during peak breeding for known large populations; 15-minute surveys with repeat visits should be used for small populations or when sampling new areas. These findings should improve manually collected (auditory) call survey efficiencies for Crawfish Frogs, surveys that are being organized to provide the first objective data on the status of this species across its range.",
author = "Williams, {Perry J.} and Engbrecht, {Nathan J.} and Robb, {Joseph R.} and Terrell, {Vanessa C K} and Michael Lannoo",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1643/CH-12-157",
language = "English",
pages = "552--561",
journal = "Copeia",
issn = "0045-8511",
publisher = "American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surveying a threatened amphibian species through a narrow detection window

AU - Williams, Perry J.

AU - Engbrecht, Nathan J.

AU - Robb, Joseph R.

AU - Terrell, Vanessa C K

AU - Lannoo, Michael

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Crawfish Frogs (Lithobates areolatus) are a relatively widespread but understudied North American species suspected to be in steep decline. Discussions to petition this species for federal listing have begun and therefore effective techniques to survey and monitor populations must be developed. Crawfish Frogs produce unusually loud breeding calls, making call surveys the most efficient way to assess populations; however, their peak breeding period lasts for only a few nights, sometimes for only one night. We used automated calling survey techniques at two wetlands where the numbers of Crawfish Frog males present were known (±1%) for the entire length of the breeding season to examine detection probabilities in relation to season, time of day, weather variables, survey duration, and the numbers of males present. We then used these data to ask three simple but important questions: 1) When should researchers listen-that is, what times and under what environmental conditions should surveys for Crawfish Frogs take place? 2) How long should surveys last? and 3) What can call surveys tell us about the size of a population? The most supported model for detection included the quadratic relationship of time and date, a positive linear relationship with temperature, and a negative linear relationship with recent rain, while the most supported model for estimating abundance included the quadratic relationship of time and date, and call rate. Five-minute surveys should suffice during peak breeding for known large populations; 15-minute surveys with repeat visits should be used for small populations or when sampling new areas. These findings should improve manually collected (auditory) call survey efficiencies for Crawfish Frogs, surveys that are being organized to provide the first objective data on the status of this species across its range.

AB - Crawfish Frogs (Lithobates areolatus) are a relatively widespread but understudied North American species suspected to be in steep decline. Discussions to petition this species for federal listing have begun and therefore effective techniques to survey and monitor populations must be developed. Crawfish Frogs produce unusually loud breeding calls, making call surveys the most efficient way to assess populations; however, their peak breeding period lasts for only a few nights, sometimes for only one night. We used automated calling survey techniques at two wetlands where the numbers of Crawfish Frog males present were known (±1%) for the entire length of the breeding season to examine detection probabilities in relation to season, time of day, weather variables, survey duration, and the numbers of males present. We then used these data to ask three simple but important questions: 1) When should researchers listen-that is, what times and under what environmental conditions should surveys for Crawfish Frogs take place? 2) How long should surveys last? and 3) What can call surveys tell us about the size of a population? The most supported model for detection included the quadratic relationship of time and date, a positive linear relationship with temperature, and a negative linear relationship with recent rain, while the most supported model for estimating abundance included the quadratic relationship of time and date, and call rate. Five-minute surveys should suffice during peak breeding for known large populations; 15-minute surveys with repeat visits should be used for small populations or when sampling new areas. These findings should improve manually collected (auditory) call survey efficiencies for Crawfish Frogs, surveys that are being organized to provide the first objective data on the status of this species across its range.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885084471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885084471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1643/CH-12-157

DO - 10.1643/CH-12-157

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885084471

SP - 552

EP - 561

JO - Copeia

JF - Copeia

SN - 0045-8511

IS - 3

ER -