Surviving organizational disasters

W. Jack Duncan, Valerie Yeager, Andrew C. Rucks, Peter M. Ginter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Man-made and natural disasters are becoming increasingly common in today's world. Among other entities, companies should be concerned because these impact organizational survival, disrupting the lives and functioning of employees, suppliers, customers, and organizational infrastructure. If the present trend continues, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is on track to declare 30% more disasters in 2010 than in 2009. Organizational disasters are crises in the extreme. While the crisis management literature provides a useful foundation for planning for internal organizational threats, it does not adequately address larger external threats brought about by disasters. With this gap in mind, we herein present a framework for planning for man-made or natural disasters: continuity of operations planning (COOP). Continuity of operations planning is a tool that aids organizations in staying in business under extreme circumstances. Although continuity of operations planning is not an entirely new practice, many small and medium-sized firms are reluctant to engage in this type of planning. To highlight the value of the process, this article provides examples of organizational disasters, alongside a simplified method for developing an effective continuity of operations plan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-142
Number of pages8
JournalBusiness Horizons
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disaster
Continuity
Operations planning
Planning
Threat
Natural disasters
Man-made disasters
Emergency management
Suppliers
Organizational impacts
Employees
Functioning
Crisis management
Small and medium-sized firms

Keywords

  • Business
  • Continuity
  • Disaster
  • Emergency preparedness
  • Planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

Duncan, W. J., Yeager, V., Rucks, A. C., & Ginter, P. M. (2011). Surviving organizational disasters. Business Horizons, 54(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.10.005

Surviving organizational disasters. / Duncan, W. Jack; Yeager, Valerie; Rucks, Andrew C.; Ginter, Peter M.

In: Business Horizons, Vol. 54, No. 2, 01.03.2011, p. 135-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duncan, WJ, Yeager, V, Rucks, AC & Ginter, PM 2011, 'Surviving organizational disasters', Business Horizons, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.10.005
Duncan, W. Jack ; Yeager, Valerie ; Rucks, Andrew C. ; Ginter, Peter M. / Surviving organizational disasters. In: Business Horizons. 2011 ; Vol. 54, No. 2. pp. 135-142.
@article{b8ad01c0a09f4b93bf8705a69a999456,
title = "Surviving organizational disasters",
abstract = "Man-made and natural disasters are becoming increasingly common in today's world. Among other entities, companies should be concerned because these impact organizational survival, disrupting the lives and functioning of employees, suppliers, customers, and organizational infrastructure. If the present trend continues, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is on track to declare 30{\%} more disasters in 2010 than in 2009. Organizational disasters are crises in the extreme. While the crisis management literature provides a useful foundation for planning for internal organizational threats, it does not adequately address larger external threats brought about by disasters. With this gap in mind, we herein present a framework for planning for man-made or natural disasters: continuity of operations planning (COOP). Continuity of operations planning is a tool that aids organizations in staying in business under extreme circumstances. Although continuity of operations planning is not an entirely new practice, many small and medium-sized firms are reluctant to engage in this type of planning. To highlight the value of the process, this article provides examples of organizational disasters, alongside a simplified method for developing an effective continuity of operations plan.",
keywords = "Business, Continuity, Disaster, Emergency preparedness, Planning",
author = "Duncan, {W. Jack} and Valerie Yeager and Rucks, {Andrew C.} and Ginter, {Peter M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bushor.2010.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "135--142",
journal = "Business Horizons",
issn = "0007-6813",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surviving organizational disasters

AU - Duncan, W. Jack

AU - Yeager, Valerie

AU - Rucks, Andrew C.

AU - Ginter, Peter M.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Man-made and natural disasters are becoming increasingly common in today's world. Among other entities, companies should be concerned because these impact organizational survival, disrupting the lives and functioning of employees, suppliers, customers, and organizational infrastructure. If the present trend continues, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is on track to declare 30% more disasters in 2010 than in 2009. Organizational disasters are crises in the extreme. While the crisis management literature provides a useful foundation for planning for internal organizational threats, it does not adequately address larger external threats brought about by disasters. With this gap in mind, we herein present a framework for planning for man-made or natural disasters: continuity of operations planning (COOP). Continuity of operations planning is a tool that aids organizations in staying in business under extreme circumstances. Although continuity of operations planning is not an entirely new practice, many small and medium-sized firms are reluctant to engage in this type of planning. To highlight the value of the process, this article provides examples of organizational disasters, alongside a simplified method for developing an effective continuity of operations plan.

AB - Man-made and natural disasters are becoming increasingly common in today's world. Among other entities, companies should be concerned because these impact organizational survival, disrupting the lives and functioning of employees, suppliers, customers, and organizational infrastructure. If the present trend continues, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is on track to declare 30% more disasters in 2010 than in 2009. Organizational disasters are crises in the extreme. While the crisis management literature provides a useful foundation for planning for internal organizational threats, it does not adequately address larger external threats brought about by disasters. With this gap in mind, we herein present a framework for planning for man-made or natural disasters: continuity of operations planning (COOP). Continuity of operations planning is a tool that aids organizations in staying in business under extreme circumstances. Although continuity of operations planning is not an entirely new practice, many small and medium-sized firms are reluctant to engage in this type of planning. To highlight the value of the process, this article provides examples of organizational disasters, alongside a simplified method for developing an effective continuity of operations plan.

KW - Business

KW - Continuity

KW - Disaster

KW - Emergency preparedness

KW - Planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551642121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551642121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 135

EP - 142

JO - Business Horizons

JF - Business Horizons

SN - 0007-6813

IS - 2

ER -