Synovial sarcoma of the upper digestive tract

A report of two cases with demonstration of the X;18 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Steven D. Billings, Lorraine F. Meisner, Oscar Cummings, Eduardo Tejada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two cases of synovial sarcoma that arose in the upper digestive tract are reported. One case was a polypoid mass that arose at the gastroesophageal junction; the other was a large intramural mass that arose in the wall of the stomach. Both cases had a classic biphasic pattern. In the stomach tumor, the biphasic morphology was focal and there was an abrupt transition to poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The tumors had immunohistochemical features that were consistent with synovial sarcoma. Ultrastructural evaluation of the gastroesophageal tumor supported the diagnosis. The diagnostic X;18 translocation was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on sections from paraffin-embedded tissue in 86% and 50% of interphase nuclei from the gastroesophageal and gastric tumor, respectively. The translocation was present in equal frequency in the epithelial and spindle cells in the biphasic areas and the poorly differentiated areas of the gastric tumor, indicating that the development of the more aggressive subclone was probably due to genetic mutations not encompassing the SYT-SSX gene fusion product. We are aware of only five reported cases of synovial sarcoma arising in the digestive tract, all in the proximal esophagus. These cases are the first reported arising in the gastroesophageal junction and stomach and the only cases of synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract in which the diagnostic translocation was demonstrated. Sarcomatoid carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor are the main differential diagnoses for synovial sarcoma in this site. Synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract may be underdiagnosed, and its recognition may have important clinical implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is helpful in making this distinction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-76
Number of pages9
JournalModern Pathology
Volume13
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Synovial Sarcoma
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Gastrointestinal Tract
Stomach
Esophagogastric Junction
Neoplasms
Carcinosarcoma
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
Gene Fusion
Interphase
Paraffin
Esophagus
Differential Diagnosis
Epithelial Cells
Mutation

Keywords

  • Chromosomal translocation
  • Esophageal neoplasms
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Stomach neoplasms
  • Synovial sarcoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Synovial sarcoma of the upper digestive tract : A report of two cases with demonstration of the X;18 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. / Billings, Steven D.; Meisner, Lorraine F.; Cummings, Oscar; Tejada, Eduardo.

In: Modern Pathology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 68-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea853824fc9f414aa44a509b2a9da9b8,
title = "Synovial sarcoma of the upper digestive tract: A report of two cases with demonstration of the X;18 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization",
abstract = "Two cases of synovial sarcoma that arose in the upper digestive tract are reported. One case was a polypoid mass that arose at the gastroesophageal junction; the other was a large intramural mass that arose in the wall of the stomach. Both cases had a classic biphasic pattern. In the stomach tumor, the biphasic morphology was focal and there was an abrupt transition to poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The tumors had immunohistochemical features that were consistent with synovial sarcoma. Ultrastructural evaluation of the gastroesophageal tumor supported the diagnosis. The diagnostic X;18 translocation was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on sections from paraffin-embedded tissue in 86{\%} and 50{\%} of interphase nuclei from the gastroesophageal and gastric tumor, respectively. The translocation was present in equal frequency in the epithelial and spindle cells in the biphasic areas and the poorly differentiated areas of the gastric tumor, indicating that the development of the more aggressive subclone was probably due to genetic mutations not encompassing the SYT-SSX gene fusion product. We are aware of only five reported cases of synovial sarcoma arising in the digestive tract, all in the proximal esophagus. These cases are the first reported arising in the gastroesophageal junction and stomach and the only cases of synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract in which the diagnostic translocation was demonstrated. Sarcomatoid carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor are the main differential diagnoses for synovial sarcoma in this site. Synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract may be underdiagnosed, and its recognition may have important clinical implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is helpful in making this distinction.",
keywords = "Chromosomal translocation, Esophageal neoplasms, Fluorescence in situ hybridization, Immunohistochemistry, Stomach neoplasms, Synovial sarcoma",
author = "Billings, {Steven D.} and Meisner, {Lorraine F.} and Oscar Cummings and Eduardo Tejada",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "68--76",
journal = "Modern Pathology",
issn = "0893-3952",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synovial sarcoma of the upper digestive tract

T2 - A report of two cases with demonstration of the X;18 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization

AU - Billings, Steven D.

AU - Meisner, Lorraine F.

AU - Cummings, Oscar

AU - Tejada, Eduardo

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - Two cases of synovial sarcoma that arose in the upper digestive tract are reported. One case was a polypoid mass that arose at the gastroesophageal junction; the other was a large intramural mass that arose in the wall of the stomach. Both cases had a classic biphasic pattern. In the stomach tumor, the biphasic morphology was focal and there was an abrupt transition to poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The tumors had immunohistochemical features that were consistent with synovial sarcoma. Ultrastructural evaluation of the gastroesophageal tumor supported the diagnosis. The diagnostic X;18 translocation was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on sections from paraffin-embedded tissue in 86% and 50% of interphase nuclei from the gastroesophageal and gastric tumor, respectively. The translocation was present in equal frequency in the epithelial and spindle cells in the biphasic areas and the poorly differentiated areas of the gastric tumor, indicating that the development of the more aggressive subclone was probably due to genetic mutations not encompassing the SYT-SSX gene fusion product. We are aware of only five reported cases of synovial sarcoma arising in the digestive tract, all in the proximal esophagus. These cases are the first reported arising in the gastroesophageal junction and stomach and the only cases of synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract in which the diagnostic translocation was demonstrated. Sarcomatoid carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor are the main differential diagnoses for synovial sarcoma in this site. Synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract may be underdiagnosed, and its recognition may have important clinical implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is helpful in making this distinction.

AB - Two cases of synovial sarcoma that arose in the upper digestive tract are reported. One case was a polypoid mass that arose at the gastroesophageal junction; the other was a large intramural mass that arose in the wall of the stomach. Both cases had a classic biphasic pattern. In the stomach tumor, the biphasic morphology was focal and there was an abrupt transition to poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma. The tumors had immunohistochemical features that were consistent with synovial sarcoma. Ultrastructural evaluation of the gastroesophageal tumor supported the diagnosis. The diagnostic X;18 translocation was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization on sections from paraffin-embedded tissue in 86% and 50% of interphase nuclei from the gastroesophageal and gastric tumor, respectively. The translocation was present in equal frequency in the epithelial and spindle cells in the biphasic areas and the poorly differentiated areas of the gastric tumor, indicating that the development of the more aggressive subclone was probably due to genetic mutations not encompassing the SYT-SSX gene fusion product. We are aware of only five reported cases of synovial sarcoma arising in the digestive tract, all in the proximal esophagus. These cases are the first reported arising in the gastroesophageal junction and stomach and the only cases of synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract in which the diagnostic translocation was demonstrated. Sarcomatoid carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor are the main differential diagnoses for synovial sarcoma in this site. Synovial sarcoma of the digestive tract may be underdiagnosed, and its recognition may have important clinical implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization is helpful in making this distinction.

KW - Chromosomal translocation

KW - Esophageal neoplasms

KW - Fluorescence in situ hybridization

KW - Immunohistochemistry

KW - Stomach neoplasms

KW - Synovial sarcoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033967168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033967168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 68

EP - 76

JO - Modern Pathology

JF - Modern Pathology

SN - 0893-3952

IS - 1

ER -