Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women: When is a booster dose important?

Celette Sugg Skinner, Sarah C. Kobrin, Patrick O. Monahan, Joanne Daggy, Usha Menon, Helen Smith Todora, Victoria L. Champion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess added value of a booster dose of a tailored mammography intervention. Methods: Participants, non-adherent at baseline, were randomly assigned to usual care or one of three tailored interventions. Intervention group members (n = 657) were further randomly assigned to receive/not receive a booster intervention dose. Electronic record mammography data were collected following initial intervention and at 6 and 15 months post-booster. Results: Booster had no effect among women not screened after first intervention dose (n = 337). Among women screened after initial dose (n = 320), booster predicted re-screening at 6 but not 15 months. A booster × race interaction showed a booster effect at 6 months for African Americans (OR = 4.66, p = .0005) but not Caucasians (OR = 0.74, p = .44). Conclusions: Findings suggest if a first-dose intervention does not facilitate screening, neither will a booster dose. However, among women for whom a first dose is effective, boosters can facilitate timely repeat adherence, especially among African Americans. At 6 months booster recipients were less likely to be off-schedule but, by 15 months, the groups were similar. Practice implications: Boosters may effect when, but not whether, women continue screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-94
Number of pages8
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Mammography
African Americans
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • Mammography
  • Tailored interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women : When is a booster dose important? / Skinner, Celette Sugg; Kobrin, Sarah C.; Monahan, Patrick O.; Daggy, Joanne; Menon, Usha; Todora, Helen Smith; Champion, Victoria L.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 87-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44f702b8c5a74773b69501aa0a89e2f0,
title = "Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women: When is a booster dose important?",
abstract = "Objective: To assess added value of a booster dose of a tailored mammography intervention. Methods: Participants, non-adherent at baseline, were randomly assigned to usual care or one of three tailored interventions. Intervention group members (n = 657) were further randomly assigned to receive/not receive a booster intervention dose. Electronic record mammography data were collected following initial intervention and at 6 and 15 months post-booster. Results: Booster had no effect among women not screened after first intervention dose (n = 337). Among women screened after initial dose (n = 320), booster predicted re-screening at 6 but not 15 months. A booster × race interaction showed a booster effect at 6 months for African Americans (OR = 4.66, p = .0005) but not Caucasians (OR = 0.74, p = .44). Conclusions: Findings suggest if a first-dose intervention does not facilitate screening, neither will a booster dose. However, among women for whom a first dose is effective, boosters can facilitate timely repeat adherence, especially among African Americans. At 6 months booster recipients were less likely to be off-schedule but, by 15 months, the groups were similar. Practice implications: Boosters may effect when, but not whether, women continue screening.",
keywords = "Mammography, Tailored interventions",
author = "Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Kobrin, {Sarah C.} and Monahan, {Patrick O.} and Joanne Daggy and Usha Menon and Todora, {Helen Smith} and Champion, {Victoria L.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "87--94",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women

T2 - When is a booster dose important?

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Kobrin, Sarah C.

AU - Monahan, Patrick O.

AU - Daggy, Joanne

AU - Menon, Usha

AU - Todora, Helen Smith

AU - Champion, Victoria L.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Objective: To assess added value of a booster dose of a tailored mammography intervention. Methods: Participants, non-adherent at baseline, were randomly assigned to usual care or one of three tailored interventions. Intervention group members (n = 657) were further randomly assigned to receive/not receive a booster intervention dose. Electronic record mammography data were collected following initial intervention and at 6 and 15 months post-booster. Results: Booster had no effect among women not screened after first intervention dose (n = 337). Among women screened after initial dose (n = 320), booster predicted re-screening at 6 but not 15 months. A booster × race interaction showed a booster effect at 6 months for African Americans (OR = 4.66, p = .0005) but not Caucasians (OR = 0.74, p = .44). Conclusions: Findings suggest if a first-dose intervention does not facilitate screening, neither will a booster dose. However, among women for whom a first dose is effective, boosters can facilitate timely repeat adherence, especially among African Americans. At 6 months booster recipients were less likely to be off-schedule but, by 15 months, the groups were similar. Practice implications: Boosters may effect when, but not whether, women continue screening.

AB - Objective: To assess added value of a booster dose of a tailored mammography intervention. Methods: Participants, non-adherent at baseline, were randomly assigned to usual care or one of three tailored interventions. Intervention group members (n = 657) were further randomly assigned to receive/not receive a booster intervention dose. Electronic record mammography data were collected following initial intervention and at 6 and 15 months post-booster. Results: Booster had no effect among women not screened after first intervention dose (n = 337). Among women screened after initial dose (n = 320), booster predicted re-screening at 6 but not 15 months. A booster × race interaction showed a booster effect at 6 months for African Americans (OR = 4.66, p = .0005) but not Caucasians (OR = 0.74, p = .44). Conclusions: Findings suggest if a first-dose intervention does not facilitate screening, neither will a booster dose. However, among women for whom a first dose is effective, boosters can facilitate timely repeat adherence, especially among African Americans. At 6 months booster recipients were less likely to be off-schedule but, by 15 months, the groups were similar. Practice implications: Boosters may effect when, but not whether, women continue screening.

KW - Mammography

KW - Tailored interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751541365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751541365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 16872787

AN - SCOPUS:33751541365

VL - 65

SP - 87

EP - 94

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -