Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research

Greg Sachs, M. Siegler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 1990, federal guidelines have required 'instruction about the responsible conduct of research' for science trainees who are supported by certain National Research Service Award (NRSA) training grants. This article reports how one school, The University of Chicago, responded to this requirement by developing a two-year 'scientific integrity' program, targeted for but not limited to trainees on NRSA grants. The program features lectures the first year and seminars the next on a variety of topics related to the responsible conduct of research. This arrangement allows trainees to benefit both from the presentations of important university and outside speakers and from the intimate exchange possible only in smaller group settings. The program is an ongoing course rather than an intensive one- or two-day effort, and is intended not as an effort to reform dishonest persons who are likely to commit outright fraud but to serve the large group of honest trainees by helping them learn the important ethical issues and norms in the practice of good science, recognize areas of ethical conflict in research and scientific training, and understand their own values better. The authors discuss some major structural, procedural, and philosophical questions that had to be faced as the program was developed. They report the difficulties of evaluating such a program but believe that it and programs like it can have a variety of benefits, which they describe, for both the trainees themselves and the larger research community. The authors hope the report of their program will stimulate discussion of the potential benefits of educational programs on the responsible conduct of research and of how universities should respond in developing such programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)871-875
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume68
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

integrity
Teaching
trainee
Research
Organized Financing
Hope
grant
Fraud
university
Ethics
fraud
science
educational program
small group
Guidelines
instruction
reform
human being
school
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research. / Sachs, Greg; Siegler, M.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, No. 12, 1993, p. 871-875.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a1eeedd253a4715bbe9a28b5bbf2535,
title = "Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research",
abstract = "Since 1990, federal guidelines have required 'instruction about the responsible conduct of research' for science trainees who are supported by certain National Research Service Award (NRSA) training grants. This article reports how one school, The University of Chicago, responded to this requirement by developing a two-year 'scientific integrity' program, targeted for but not limited to trainees on NRSA grants. The program features lectures the first year and seminars the next on a variety of topics related to the responsible conduct of research. This arrangement allows trainees to benefit both from the presentations of important university and outside speakers and from the intimate exchange possible only in smaller group settings. The program is an ongoing course rather than an intensive one- or two-day effort, and is intended not as an effort to reform dishonest persons who are likely to commit outright fraud but to serve the large group of honest trainees by helping them learn the important ethical issues and norms in the practice of good science, recognize areas of ethical conflict in research and scientific training, and understand their own values better. The authors discuss some major structural, procedural, and philosophical questions that had to be faced as the program was developed. They report the difficulties of evaluating such a program but believe that it and programs like it can have a variety of benefits, which they describe, for both the trainees themselves and the larger research community. The authors hope the report of their program will stimulate discussion of the potential benefits of educational programs on the responsible conduct of research and of how universities should respond in developing such programs.",
author = "Greg Sachs and M. Siegler",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "871--875",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research

AU - Sachs, Greg

AU - Siegler, M.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Since 1990, federal guidelines have required 'instruction about the responsible conduct of research' for science trainees who are supported by certain National Research Service Award (NRSA) training grants. This article reports how one school, The University of Chicago, responded to this requirement by developing a two-year 'scientific integrity' program, targeted for but not limited to trainees on NRSA grants. The program features lectures the first year and seminars the next on a variety of topics related to the responsible conduct of research. This arrangement allows trainees to benefit both from the presentations of important university and outside speakers and from the intimate exchange possible only in smaller group settings. The program is an ongoing course rather than an intensive one- or two-day effort, and is intended not as an effort to reform dishonest persons who are likely to commit outright fraud but to serve the large group of honest trainees by helping them learn the important ethical issues and norms in the practice of good science, recognize areas of ethical conflict in research and scientific training, and understand their own values better. The authors discuss some major structural, procedural, and philosophical questions that had to be faced as the program was developed. They report the difficulties of evaluating such a program but believe that it and programs like it can have a variety of benefits, which they describe, for both the trainees themselves and the larger research community. The authors hope the report of their program will stimulate discussion of the potential benefits of educational programs on the responsible conduct of research and of how universities should respond in developing such programs.

AB - Since 1990, federal guidelines have required 'instruction about the responsible conduct of research' for science trainees who are supported by certain National Research Service Award (NRSA) training grants. This article reports how one school, The University of Chicago, responded to this requirement by developing a two-year 'scientific integrity' program, targeted for but not limited to trainees on NRSA grants. The program features lectures the first year and seminars the next on a variety of topics related to the responsible conduct of research. This arrangement allows trainees to benefit both from the presentations of important university and outside speakers and from the intimate exchange possible only in smaller group settings. The program is an ongoing course rather than an intensive one- or two-day effort, and is intended not as an effort to reform dishonest persons who are likely to commit outright fraud but to serve the large group of honest trainees by helping them learn the important ethical issues and norms in the practice of good science, recognize areas of ethical conflict in research and scientific training, and understand their own values better. The authors discuss some major structural, procedural, and philosophical questions that had to be faced as the program was developed. They report the difficulties of evaluating such a program but believe that it and programs like it can have a variety of benefits, which they describe, for both the trainees themselves and the larger research community. The authors hope the report of their program will stimulate discussion of the potential benefits of educational programs on the responsible conduct of research and of how universities should respond in developing such programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027141127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027141127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 871

EP - 875

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 12

ER -