Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: Does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration

Cherri Hobgood, Gwen Sherwood, Karen Frush, David Hollar, Laura Maynard, Beverly Foster, Susan Sawning, Donald Woodyard, Carol Durham, Melanie Wright, Jeffrey Taekman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The authors conducted a randomised controlled trial of four pedagogical methods commonly used to deliver teamwork training and measured the effects of each method on the acquisition of student teamwork knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Methods: The authors recruited 203 senior nursing students and 235 fourth-year medical students (total N=438) from two major universities for a 1-day interdisciplinary teamwork training course. Allparticipants received a didactic lecture and then were randomly assigned to one of four educational methods: Didactic (control), audience response didactic, role play and human patient simulation. Student performance was assessed for teamwork attitudes, knowledge and skills using: (a) a 36-item teamwork attitudes instrument (CHIRP), (b) a 12-item teamwork knowledge test, (c) a 10-item standardised patient (SP) evaluation of student teamwork skills performance and (d) a 20-item modification of items from the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS). Results: All four cohorts demonstrated an improvement in attitudes (F1,370=48.7, p=0.001) and knowledge (F1,353=87.3, p=0.001) pre-to post-test. No educational modality appeared superior for attitude (F3,370=0.325, p=0.808) or knowledge (F3,353=0.382, p=0.766) acquisition. No modality demonstrated a significant change in teamwork skills (F 3,18=2.12, p=0.134). Conclusions Each of the four modalities demonstrated significantly improved teamwork knowledge and attitudes, but no modality was demonstrated to be superior. Institutions should feel free to utilise educational modalities, which are best supported by their resources to deliver interdisciplinary teamwork training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalQuality and Safety in Health Care
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing Students
Medical Students
Students
Patient Simulation
Randomized Controlled Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Teamwork training with nursing and medical students : Does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration. / Hobgood, Cherri; Sherwood, Gwen; Frush, Karen; Hollar, David; Maynard, Laura; Foster, Beverly; Sawning, Susan; Woodyard, Donald; Durham, Carol; Wright, Melanie; Taekman, Jeffrey.

In: Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 19, No. 6, 12.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hobgood, Cherri ; Sherwood, Gwen ; Frush, Karen ; Hollar, David ; Maynard, Laura ; Foster, Beverly ; Sawning, Susan ; Woodyard, Donald ; Durham, Carol ; Wright, Melanie ; Taekman, Jeffrey. / Teamwork training with nursing and medical students : Does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration. In: Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 6.
@article{88ed7f468ffe495a9f5da307125b58da,
title = "Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: Does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration",
abstract = "Objectives: The authors conducted a randomised controlled trial of four pedagogical methods commonly used to deliver teamwork training and measured the effects of each method on the acquisition of student teamwork knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Methods: The authors recruited 203 senior nursing students and 235 fourth-year medical students (total N=438) from two major universities for a 1-day interdisciplinary teamwork training course. Allparticipants received a didactic lecture and then were randomly assigned to one of four educational methods: Didactic (control), audience response didactic, role play and human patient simulation. Student performance was assessed for teamwork attitudes, knowledge and skills using: (a) a 36-item teamwork attitudes instrument (CHIRP), (b) a 12-item teamwork knowledge test, (c) a 10-item standardised patient (SP) evaluation of student teamwork skills performance and (d) a 20-item modification of items from the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS). Results: All four cohorts demonstrated an improvement in attitudes (F1,370=48.7, p=0.001) and knowledge (F1,353=87.3, p=0.001) pre-to post-test. No educational modality appeared superior for attitude (F3,370=0.325, p=0.808) or knowledge (F3,353=0.382, p=0.766) acquisition. No modality demonstrated a significant change in teamwork skills (F 3,18=2.12, p=0.134). Conclusions Each of the four modalities demonstrated significantly improved teamwork knowledge and attitudes, but no modality was demonstrated to be superior. Institutions should feel free to utilise educational modalities, which are best supported by their resources to deliver interdisciplinary teamwork training.",
author = "Cherri Hobgood and Gwen Sherwood and Karen Frush and David Hollar and Laura Maynard and Beverly Foster and Susan Sawning and Donald Woodyard and Carol Durham and Melanie Wright and Jeffrey Taekman",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2008.031732",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teamwork training with nursing and medical students

T2 - Does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration

AU - Hobgood, Cherri

AU - Sherwood, Gwen

AU - Frush, Karen

AU - Hollar, David

AU - Maynard, Laura

AU - Foster, Beverly

AU - Sawning, Susan

AU - Woodyard, Donald

AU - Durham, Carol

AU - Wright, Melanie

AU - Taekman, Jeffrey

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Objectives: The authors conducted a randomised controlled trial of four pedagogical methods commonly used to deliver teamwork training and measured the effects of each method on the acquisition of student teamwork knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Methods: The authors recruited 203 senior nursing students and 235 fourth-year medical students (total N=438) from two major universities for a 1-day interdisciplinary teamwork training course. Allparticipants received a didactic lecture and then were randomly assigned to one of four educational methods: Didactic (control), audience response didactic, role play and human patient simulation. Student performance was assessed for teamwork attitudes, knowledge and skills using: (a) a 36-item teamwork attitudes instrument (CHIRP), (b) a 12-item teamwork knowledge test, (c) a 10-item standardised patient (SP) evaluation of student teamwork skills performance and (d) a 20-item modification of items from the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS). Results: All four cohorts demonstrated an improvement in attitudes (F1,370=48.7, p=0.001) and knowledge (F1,353=87.3, p=0.001) pre-to post-test. No educational modality appeared superior for attitude (F3,370=0.325, p=0.808) or knowledge (F3,353=0.382, p=0.766) acquisition. No modality demonstrated a significant change in teamwork skills (F 3,18=2.12, p=0.134). Conclusions Each of the four modalities demonstrated significantly improved teamwork knowledge and attitudes, but no modality was demonstrated to be superior. Institutions should feel free to utilise educational modalities, which are best supported by their resources to deliver interdisciplinary teamwork training.

AB - Objectives: The authors conducted a randomised controlled trial of four pedagogical methods commonly used to deliver teamwork training and measured the effects of each method on the acquisition of student teamwork knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Methods: The authors recruited 203 senior nursing students and 235 fourth-year medical students (total N=438) from two major universities for a 1-day interdisciplinary teamwork training course. Allparticipants received a didactic lecture and then were randomly assigned to one of four educational methods: Didactic (control), audience response didactic, role play and human patient simulation. Student performance was assessed for teamwork attitudes, knowledge and skills using: (a) a 36-item teamwork attitudes instrument (CHIRP), (b) a 12-item teamwork knowledge test, (c) a 10-item standardised patient (SP) evaluation of student teamwork skills performance and (d) a 20-item modification of items from the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS). Results: All four cohorts demonstrated an improvement in attitudes (F1,370=48.7, p=0.001) and knowledge (F1,353=87.3, p=0.001) pre-to post-test. No educational modality appeared superior for attitude (F3,370=0.325, p=0.808) or knowledge (F3,353=0.382, p=0.766) acquisition. No modality demonstrated a significant change in teamwork skills (F 3,18=2.12, p=0.134). Conclusions Each of the four modalities demonstrated significantly improved teamwork knowledge and attitudes, but no modality was demonstrated to be superior. Institutions should feel free to utilise educational modalities, which are best supported by their resources to deliver interdisciplinary teamwork training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650338169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650338169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2008.031732

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2008.031732

M3 - Article

C2 - 20427311

AN - SCOPUS:78650338169

VL - 19

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 6

ER -