Temporal bone: Comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT

Karen S. Caldemeyer, Kumar Sandrasegaran, C. Nazenin Shinaver, Vincent Mathews, Richard R. Smith, Kenyon K. Kopecky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The objective of the study was to compare helical CT (with reformation of coronal images from the axial data set) with conventional direct axial and coronal CT of the temporal bones. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients underwent both conventional 1-mm direct axial and coronal CT and helical 0.5-mm axial CT. The helical data set was reconstructed at 0.2-mm increments, and axial and coronal images were reconstructed in a plane similar to that of the conventional study, with a slice width of 0.5 mm and 0.5-mm increments. Forty small structures were evaluated independently by three observers, who were unaware of the method of imaging. Observers graded the 40 structures using a modified Likert scale. The graded differences between the two techniques were evaluated using a paired t test. Correlation between observers' gradings was evaluated using analysis of variance. RESULTS. The helical CT technique scored significantly higher than the conventional technique for many individual structures and groups of structures (scutum [p = .041], stapes footplate [p = .006], stapes crura [p = .004], oval window [p = .026], crista falciformis [p = .006], whole temporal bone [p = .012], middle ear [p = .033], inner ear [p = .021], ossicles [p = .044], and stapes [p = .010]). The correlation coefficient among observers was .91 for the whole temporal bone. CONCLUSION. Helical CT using 0.5-mm technique and reconstruction produces diagnostic images comparable with or superior to conventional 1-mm technique because helical CT can obtain thinner slices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1675-1682
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume172
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

Temporal Bone
Spiral Computed Tomography
Stapes
Middle Ear
Inner Ear
Analysis of Variance
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Temporal bone : Comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT. / Caldemeyer, Karen S.; Sandrasegaran, Kumar; Shinaver, C. Nazenin; Mathews, Vincent; Smith, Richard R.; Kopecky, Kenyon K.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 172, No. 6, 06.1999, p. 1675-1682.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caldemeyer, Karen S. ; Sandrasegaran, Kumar ; Shinaver, C. Nazenin ; Mathews, Vincent ; Smith, Richard R. ; Kopecky, Kenyon K. / Temporal bone : Comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1999 ; Vol. 172, No. 6. pp. 1675-1682.
@article{b8f993047a684be88f12d01ff3374c88,
title = "Temporal bone: Comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The objective of the study was to compare helical CT (with reformation of coronal images from the axial data set) with conventional direct axial and coronal CT of the temporal bones. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients underwent both conventional 1-mm direct axial and coronal CT and helical 0.5-mm axial CT. The helical data set was reconstructed at 0.2-mm increments, and axial and coronal images were reconstructed in a plane similar to that of the conventional study, with a slice width of 0.5 mm and 0.5-mm increments. Forty small structures were evaluated independently by three observers, who were unaware of the method of imaging. Observers graded the 40 structures using a modified Likert scale. The graded differences between the two techniques were evaluated using a paired t test. Correlation between observers' gradings was evaluated using analysis of variance. RESULTS. The helical CT technique scored significantly higher than the conventional technique for many individual structures and groups of structures (scutum [p = .041], stapes footplate [p = .006], stapes crura [p = .004], oval window [p = .026], crista falciformis [p = .006], whole temporal bone [p = .012], middle ear [p = .033], inner ear [p = .021], ossicles [p = .044], and stapes [p = .010]). The correlation coefficient among observers was .91 for the whole temporal bone. CONCLUSION. Helical CT using 0.5-mm technique and reconstruction produces diagnostic images comparable with or superior to conventional 1-mm technique because helical CT can obtain thinner slices.",
author = "Caldemeyer, {Karen S.} and Kumar Sandrasegaran and Shinaver, {C. Nazenin} and Vincent Mathews and Smith, {Richard R.} and Kopecky, {Kenyon K.}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "172",
pages = "1675--1682",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal bone

T2 - Comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT

AU - Caldemeyer, Karen S.

AU - Sandrasegaran, Kumar

AU - Shinaver, C. Nazenin

AU - Mathews, Vincent

AU - Smith, Richard R.

AU - Kopecky, Kenyon K.

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The objective of the study was to compare helical CT (with reformation of coronal images from the axial data set) with conventional direct axial and coronal CT of the temporal bones. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients underwent both conventional 1-mm direct axial and coronal CT and helical 0.5-mm axial CT. The helical data set was reconstructed at 0.2-mm increments, and axial and coronal images were reconstructed in a plane similar to that of the conventional study, with a slice width of 0.5 mm and 0.5-mm increments. Forty small structures were evaluated independently by three observers, who were unaware of the method of imaging. Observers graded the 40 structures using a modified Likert scale. The graded differences between the two techniques were evaluated using a paired t test. Correlation between observers' gradings was evaluated using analysis of variance. RESULTS. The helical CT technique scored significantly higher than the conventional technique for many individual structures and groups of structures (scutum [p = .041], stapes footplate [p = .006], stapes crura [p = .004], oval window [p = .026], crista falciformis [p = .006], whole temporal bone [p = .012], middle ear [p = .033], inner ear [p = .021], ossicles [p = .044], and stapes [p = .010]). The correlation coefficient among observers was .91 for the whole temporal bone. CONCLUSION. Helical CT using 0.5-mm technique and reconstruction produces diagnostic images comparable with or superior to conventional 1-mm technique because helical CT can obtain thinner slices.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The objective of the study was to compare helical CT (with reformation of coronal images from the axial data set) with conventional direct axial and coronal CT of the temporal bones. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients underwent both conventional 1-mm direct axial and coronal CT and helical 0.5-mm axial CT. The helical data set was reconstructed at 0.2-mm increments, and axial and coronal images were reconstructed in a plane similar to that of the conventional study, with a slice width of 0.5 mm and 0.5-mm increments. Forty small structures were evaluated independently by three observers, who were unaware of the method of imaging. Observers graded the 40 structures using a modified Likert scale. The graded differences between the two techniques were evaluated using a paired t test. Correlation between observers' gradings was evaluated using analysis of variance. RESULTS. The helical CT technique scored significantly higher than the conventional technique for many individual structures and groups of structures (scutum [p = .041], stapes footplate [p = .006], stapes crura [p = .004], oval window [p = .026], crista falciformis [p = .006], whole temporal bone [p = .012], middle ear [p = .033], inner ear [p = .021], ossicles [p = .044], and stapes [p = .010]). The correlation coefficient among observers was .91 for the whole temporal bone. CONCLUSION. Helical CT using 0.5-mm technique and reconstruction produces diagnostic images comparable with or superior to conventional 1-mm technique because helical CT can obtain thinner slices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033016205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033016205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10350314

AN - SCOPUS:0033016205

VL - 172

SP - 1675

EP - 1682

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -