Text messaging in health care

A systematic review of impact studies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background - Studies suggest text messaging is beneficial to health care; however, no one has synthesized the overall evidence on texting interventions. In response to this need, we conducted a systematic review of the impacts of text messaging in health care. Methods - PubMed database searches and subsequent reference list reviews sought English-language, peer-reviewed studies involving text messaging in health care. Commentaries, conference proceedings, and feasibilities studies were excluded. Data was extracted using an article coding sheet and input into a database for analysis. Results - Of the 61 papers reviewed, 50 articles (82%) found text messaging had a positive effect on the primary outcome. Average sample sizes in articles reporting positive findings (n=813) were significantly larger than those that did not find a positive impact (n=178) on outcomes (p=0.032). Articles were categorized into focal groups as follows: 27 articles (44.3%) investigated the impact of texting on disease management, 24 articles (39.3%) focused texting's impact to public health related outcomes, and 10 articles (16.4%) examined texting and its influence on administrative processes. Articles in focal groups differed by the purpose of the study, direction of the communication, and where they were published, but not in likelihood of reporting a positive impact from texting. Conclusions - Current evidence indicates that text messaging health care interventions are largely beneficial clinically, in public health related uses, and in terms of administrative processes. However, despite the promise of these findings, literature gaps exist, especially in primary care settings, across geographic regions and with vulnerable populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationBiennial Review of Health Care Management
Pages235-261
Number of pages27
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAdvances in Health Care Management
Volume11
ISSN (Print)1474-8231

Fingerprint

Text Messaging
Delivery of Health Care
Public Health
Databases
Feasibility Studies
Vulnerable Populations
Disease Management
PubMed
Sample Size
Primary Health Care
Language
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Yeager, V., & Menachemi, N. (2011). Text messaging in health care: A systematic review of impact studies. In Biennial Review of Health Care Management (pp. 235-261). [1954353] (Advances in Health Care Management; Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011009

Text messaging in health care : A systematic review of impact studies. / Yeager, Valerie; Menachemi, Nir.

Biennial Review of Health Care Management. 2011. p. 235-261 1954353 (Advances in Health Care Management; Vol. 11).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Yeager, V & Menachemi, N 2011, Text messaging in health care: A systematic review of impact studies. in Biennial Review of Health Care Management., 1954353, Advances in Health Care Management, vol. 11, pp. 235-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011009
Yeager V, Menachemi N. Text messaging in health care: A systematic review of impact studies. In Biennial Review of Health Care Management. 2011. p. 235-261. 1954353. (Advances in Health Care Management). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011009
Yeager, Valerie ; Menachemi, Nir. / Text messaging in health care : A systematic review of impact studies. Biennial Review of Health Care Management. 2011. pp. 235-261 (Advances in Health Care Management).
@inbook{136ceac392874ff6b2a59f5b9035c599,
title = "Text messaging in health care: A systematic review of impact studies",
abstract = "Background - Studies suggest text messaging is beneficial to health care; however, no one has synthesized the overall evidence on texting interventions. In response to this need, we conducted a systematic review of the impacts of text messaging in health care. Methods - PubMed database searches and subsequent reference list reviews sought English-language, peer-reviewed studies involving text messaging in health care. Commentaries, conference proceedings, and feasibilities studies were excluded. Data was extracted using an article coding sheet and input into a database for analysis. Results - Of the 61 papers reviewed, 50 articles (82{\%}) found text messaging had a positive effect on the primary outcome. Average sample sizes in articles reporting positive findings (n=813) were significantly larger than those that did not find a positive impact (n=178) on outcomes (p=0.032). Articles were categorized into focal groups as follows: 27 articles (44.3{\%}) investigated the impact of texting on disease management, 24 articles (39.3{\%}) focused texting's impact to public health related outcomes, and 10 articles (16.4{\%}) examined texting and its influence on administrative processes. Articles in focal groups differed by the purpose of the study, direction of the communication, and where they were published, but not in likelihood of reporting a positive impact from texting. Conclusions - Current evidence indicates that text messaging health care interventions are largely beneficial clinically, in public health related uses, and in terms of administrative processes. However, despite the promise of these findings, literature gaps exist, especially in primary care settings, across geographic regions and with vulnerable populations.",
author = "Valerie Yeager and Nir Menachemi",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011009",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780857247131",
series = "Advances in Health Care Management",
pages = "235--261",
booktitle = "Biennial Review of Health Care Management",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Text messaging in health care

T2 - A systematic review of impact studies

AU - Yeager, Valerie

AU - Menachemi, Nir

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Background - Studies suggest text messaging is beneficial to health care; however, no one has synthesized the overall evidence on texting interventions. In response to this need, we conducted a systematic review of the impacts of text messaging in health care. Methods - PubMed database searches and subsequent reference list reviews sought English-language, peer-reviewed studies involving text messaging in health care. Commentaries, conference proceedings, and feasibilities studies were excluded. Data was extracted using an article coding sheet and input into a database for analysis. Results - Of the 61 papers reviewed, 50 articles (82%) found text messaging had a positive effect on the primary outcome. Average sample sizes in articles reporting positive findings (n=813) were significantly larger than those that did not find a positive impact (n=178) on outcomes (p=0.032). Articles were categorized into focal groups as follows: 27 articles (44.3%) investigated the impact of texting on disease management, 24 articles (39.3%) focused texting's impact to public health related outcomes, and 10 articles (16.4%) examined texting and its influence on administrative processes. Articles in focal groups differed by the purpose of the study, direction of the communication, and where they were published, but not in likelihood of reporting a positive impact from texting. Conclusions - Current evidence indicates that text messaging health care interventions are largely beneficial clinically, in public health related uses, and in terms of administrative processes. However, despite the promise of these findings, literature gaps exist, especially in primary care settings, across geographic regions and with vulnerable populations.

AB - Background - Studies suggest text messaging is beneficial to health care; however, no one has synthesized the overall evidence on texting interventions. In response to this need, we conducted a systematic review of the impacts of text messaging in health care. Methods - PubMed database searches and subsequent reference list reviews sought English-language, peer-reviewed studies involving text messaging in health care. Commentaries, conference proceedings, and feasibilities studies were excluded. Data was extracted using an article coding sheet and input into a database for analysis. Results - Of the 61 papers reviewed, 50 articles (82%) found text messaging had a positive effect on the primary outcome. Average sample sizes in articles reporting positive findings (n=813) were significantly larger than those that did not find a positive impact (n=178) on outcomes (p=0.032). Articles were categorized into focal groups as follows: 27 articles (44.3%) investigated the impact of texting on disease management, 24 articles (39.3%) focused texting's impact to public health related outcomes, and 10 articles (16.4%) examined texting and its influence on administrative processes. Articles in focal groups differed by the purpose of the study, direction of the communication, and where they were published, but not in likelihood of reporting a positive impact from texting. Conclusions - Current evidence indicates that text messaging health care interventions are largely beneficial clinically, in public health related uses, and in terms of administrative processes. However, despite the promise of these findings, literature gaps exist, especially in primary care settings, across geographic regions and with vulnerable populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873028650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873028650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011009

DO - 10.1108/S1474-8231(2011)0000011009

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780857247131

T3 - Advances in Health Care Management

SP - 235

EP - 261

BT - Biennial Review of Health Care Management

ER -