TH‐C‐BRD‐02: MU Calculation for Uniform Scanning Proton Beam

Q. Zhao, Huanmei Wu, M. Wolanski, D. Hecksel, D. Pack, I. Das

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Accuracy in monitor unit (MU) calculation is critical for patient treatment which is measured in proton beam for each field that takes significant of beam time. An accurate, simple and time saving method is desired for MU calculation. Presented is a sector integration approach with constant correction for dose/MU calculation for any treatment in a uniform scanning proton beam. Materials and methods: Dose measurements were made in a scanning proton beam with a parallel plate Markus ion‐chamber in a water phantom. Two methods were adopted to measure the Dose/MU values: (i) varying beam energy and SOBP values with a fixed aperture radius (10cm) at the reference point and (ii) varying the beam energy and aperture radius with a fixed SOBP. These measured values were summarized into two tables. These two tables were used to calculate dose/MU for an energy and a SOBP using certain aperture radius by linear interpolation, which produced the initial results: D(energy, SOBP)10cm and D(energy, radius)SOBP'. The dose/MU value for any field size and shape is calculated using sector integration method with a piecewise correction based on these two values. Results: Dose/MU values for total 412 beam fields without compensators were measured and calculated using the model above. The model parameters were derived from the measurements in 90 fields with varying shapes. These parameters were applied to compute the dose in the other 322 treatment fields. The difference between calculated and measured values in these 322 fields is −0.12%±1.36% for beam range in water <20 cm. The difference is smaller to −0.06%±0.74% for beam range >20cm. Conclusion: An accurate, simple, and fast method for MU calculation in any proton treatment fields is introduced. The sector integration method derived from the actual measured data produced very small error when tested in 322 additional fields.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Protons
Water
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TH‐C‐BRD‐02 : MU Calculation for Uniform Scanning Proton Beam. / Zhao, Q.; Wu, Huanmei; Wolanski, M.; Hecksel, D.; Pack, D.; Das, I.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, Q. ; Wu, Huanmei ; Wolanski, M. ; Hecksel, D. ; Pack, D. ; Das, I. / TH‐C‐BRD‐02 : MU Calculation for Uniform Scanning Proton Beam. In: Medical Physics. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 6.
@article{f9d3224ec4de456bbf17347cf845756e,
title = "TH‐C‐BRD‐02: MU Calculation for Uniform Scanning Proton Beam",
abstract = "Purpose: Accuracy in monitor unit (MU) calculation is critical for patient treatment which is measured in proton beam for each field that takes significant of beam time. An accurate, simple and time saving method is desired for MU calculation. Presented is a sector integration approach with constant correction for dose/MU calculation for any treatment in a uniform scanning proton beam. Materials and methods: Dose measurements were made in a scanning proton beam with a parallel plate Markus ion‐chamber in a water phantom. Two methods were adopted to measure the Dose/MU values: (i) varying beam energy and SOBP values with a fixed aperture radius (10cm) at the reference point and (ii) varying the beam energy and aperture radius with a fixed SOBP. These measured values were summarized into two tables. These two tables were used to calculate dose/MU for an energy and a SOBP using certain aperture radius by linear interpolation, which produced the initial results: D(energy, SOBP)10cm and D(energy, radius)SOBP'. The dose/MU value for any field size and shape is calculated using sector integration method with a piecewise correction based on these two values. Results: Dose/MU values for total 412 beam fields without compensators were measured and calculated using the model above. The model parameters were derived from the measurements in 90 fields with varying shapes. These parameters were applied to compute the dose in the other 322 treatment fields. The difference between calculated and measured values in these 322 fields is −0.12{\%}±1.36{\%} for beam range in water <20 cm. The difference is smaller to −0.06{\%}±0.74{\%} for beam range >20cm. Conclusion: An accurate, simple, and fast method for MU calculation in any proton treatment fields is introduced. The sector integration method derived from the actual measured data produced very small error when tested in 322 additional fields.",
author = "Q. Zhao and Huanmei Wu and M. Wolanski and D. Hecksel and D. Pack and I. Das",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182604",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TH‐C‐BRD‐02

T2 - MU Calculation for Uniform Scanning Proton Beam

AU - Zhao, Q.

AU - Wu, Huanmei

AU - Wolanski, M.

AU - Hecksel, D.

AU - Pack, D.

AU - Das, I.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Accuracy in monitor unit (MU) calculation is critical for patient treatment which is measured in proton beam for each field that takes significant of beam time. An accurate, simple and time saving method is desired for MU calculation. Presented is a sector integration approach with constant correction for dose/MU calculation for any treatment in a uniform scanning proton beam. Materials and methods: Dose measurements were made in a scanning proton beam with a parallel plate Markus ion‐chamber in a water phantom. Two methods were adopted to measure the Dose/MU values: (i) varying beam energy and SOBP values with a fixed aperture radius (10cm) at the reference point and (ii) varying the beam energy and aperture radius with a fixed SOBP. These measured values were summarized into two tables. These two tables were used to calculate dose/MU for an energy and a SOBP using certain aperture radius by linear interpolation, which produced the initial results: D(energy, SOBP)10cm and D(energy, radius)SOBP'. The dose/MU value for any field size and shape is calculated using sector integration method with a piecewise correction based on these two values. Results: Dose/MU values for total 412 beam fields without compensators were measured and calculated using the model above. The model parameters were derived from the measurements in 90 fields with varying shapes. These parameters were applied to compute the dose in the other 322 treatment fields. The difference between calculated and measured values in these 322 fields is −0.12%±1.36% for beam range in water <20 cm. The difference is smaller to −0.06%±0.74% for beam range >20cm. Conclusion: An accurate, simple, and fast method for MU calculation in any proton treatment fields is introduced. The sector integration method derived from the actual measured data produced very small error when tested in 322 additional fields.

AB - Purpose: Accuracy in monitor unit (MU) calculation is critical for patient treatment which is measured in proton beam for each field that takes significant of beam time. An accurate, simple and time saving method is desired for MU calculation. Presented is a sector integration approach with constant correction for dose/MU calculation for any treatment in a uniform scanning proton beam. Materials and methods: Dose measurements were made in a scanning proton beam with a parallel plate Markus ion‐chamber in a water phantom. Two methods were adopted to measure the Dose/MU values: (i) varying beam energy and SOBP values with a fixed aperture radius (10cm) at the reference point and (ii) varying the beam energy and aperture radius with a fixed SOBP. These measured values were summarized into two tables. These two tables were used to calculate dose/MU for an energy and a SOBP using certain aperture radius by linear interpolation, which produced the initial results: D(energy, SOBP)10cm and D(energy, radius)SOBP'. The dose/MU value for any field size and shape is calculated using sector integration method with a piecewise correction based on these two values. Results: Dose/MU values for total 412 beam fields without compensators were measured and calculated using the model above. The model parameters were derived from the measurements in 90 fields with varying shapes. These parameters were applied to compute the dose in the other 322 treatment fields. The difference between calculated and measured values in these 322 fields is −0.12%±1.36% for beam range in water <20 cm. The difference is smaller to −0.06%±0.74% for beam range >20cm. Conclusion: An accurate, simple, and fast method for MU calculation in any proton treatment fields is introduced. The sector integration method derived from the actual measured data produced very small error when tested in 322 additional fields.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024805889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024805889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182604

DO - 10.1118/1.3182604

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024805889

VL - 36

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -