The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys

Boaz Karmazyn, Matthew Wanner, Megan B. Marine, Luke Tilmans, S. Gregory Jennings, Roberta Hibbard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Fractures are the second most common finding in non-accidental trauma after cutaneous signs. Interpreting skeletal surveys could be challenging as some fractures are subtle and due to anatomical variations that can mimic injuries. Objective: To determine the effect of a second read by a pediatric radiologist of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma initially read at referring hospitals by general radiologists. Materials and methods: In 2016 and 2017, we identified all patients referred to our children’s hospital with previous surveys performed and read at a community hospital by an outside radiologist. We excluded patients older than 3 years and studies performed at a children’s hospital. The surveys were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist with the printed outside report available. Surveys with disagreement between outside read and pediatric radiologist read were reviewed by a second pediatric radiologist. A disagreement in the second read included only definite discrepant findings agreed upon by both pediatric radiologists. The Fisher exact test was performed to compare the ratio of discrepancies between readers in normal and abnormal surveys. Results: Two hundred twenty-five surveys were performed (120 male) at 62 referring hospitals, with a mean patient age of 10.5 months (range: 5 days-3 years). The outside read identified fractures in 104/225 (46.2%) surveys. Thirty-seven of the 225 (16.4%) contained discrepancies in interpretation (n=111). Most of these disagreements (29/37, 78.4%) resulted in a significant change in the report. There was a significant (P<0.0001) difference between disagreement rate in outside read negative (4/111, 3.2%) and positive surveys (34/104, 31.7%). The second read identified additional fractures in 22/225 (9.8%) of the surveys and disagreed with first-read fractures in 17/256 (7.6%). Four of 19 (21.1%) classic metaphyseal lesions diagnosed by the outside read were normal variants; 18 classic metaphyseal lesions were missed by the outside read. Conclusions: This study supports second reads by pediatric radiologists of skeletal surveys for non-accidental trauma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPediatric Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Wounds and Injuries
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiologists
Community Hospital
General Hospitals
Skin

Keywords

  • Children
  • Classic metaphyseal lesion
  • Fractures
  • Non-accidental trauma
  • Pediatric radiology
  • Radiography
  • Second reads
  • Skeletal survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys. / Karmazyn, Boaz; Wanner, Matthew; Marine, Megan B.; Tilmans, Luke; Jennings, S. Gregory; Hibbard, Roberta.

In: Pediatric Radiology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karmazyn, Boaz ; Wanner, Matthew ; Marine, Megan B. ; Tilmans, Luke ; Jennings, S. Gregory ; Hibbard, Roberta. / The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys. In: Pediatric Radiology. 2018.
@article{578e1057ed0544329dc68cdd5ca74977,
title = "The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys",
abstract = "Background: Fractures are the second most common finding in non-accidental trauma after cutaneous signs. Interpreting skeletal surveys could be challenging as some fractures are subtle and due to anatomical variations that can mimic injuries. Objective: To determine the effect of a second read by a pediatric radiologist of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma initially read at referring hospitals by general radiologists. Materials and methods: In 2016 and 2017, we identified all patients referred to our children’s hospital with previous surveys performed and read at a community hospital by an outside radiologist. We excluded patients older than 3 years and studies performed at a children’s hospital. The surveys were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist with the printed outside report available. Surveys with disagreement between outside read and pediatric radiologist read were reviewed by a second pediatric radiologist. A disagreement in the second read included only definite discrepant findings agreed upon by both pediatric radiologists. The Fisher exact test was performed to compare the ratio of discrepancies between readers in normal and abnormal surveys. Results: Two hundred twenty-five surveys were performed (120 male) at 62 referring hospitals, with a mean patient age of 10.5 months (range: 5 days-3 years). The outside read identified fractures in 104/225 (46.2{\%}) surveys. Thirty-seven of the 225 (16.4{\%}) contained discrepancies in interpretation (n=111). Most of these disagreements (29/37, 78.4{\%}) resulted in a significant change in the report. There was a significant (P<0.0001) difference between disagreement rate in outside read negative (4/111, 3.2{\%}) and positive surveys (34/104, 31.7{\%}). The second read identified additional fractures in 22/225 (9.8{\%}) of the surveys and disagreed with first-read fractures in 17/256 (7.6{\%}). Four of 19 (21.1{\%}) classic metaphyseal lesions diagnosed by the outside read were normal variants; 18 classic metaphyseal lesions were missed by the outside read. Conclusions: This study supports second reads by pediatric radiologists of skeletal surveys for non-accidental trauma.",
keywords = "Children, Classic metaphyseal lesion, Fractures, Non-accidental trauma, Pediatric radiology, Radiography, Second reads, Skeletal survey",
author = "Boaz Karmazyn and Matthew Wanner and Marine, {Megan B.} and Luke Tilmans and Jennings, {S. Gregory} and Roberta Hibbard",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00247-018-4276-8",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Pediatric Radiology",
issn = "0301-0449",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys

AU - Karmazyn, Boaz

AU - Wanner, Matthew

AU - Marine, Megan B.

AU - Tilmans, Luke

AU - Jennings, S. Gregory

AU - Hibbard, Roberta

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Fractures are the second most common finding in non-accidental trauma after cutaneous signs. Interpreting skeletal surveys could be challenging as some fractures are subtle and due to anatomical variations that can mimic injuries. Objective: To determine the effect of a second read by a pediatric radiologist of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma initially read at referring hospitals by general radiologists. Materials and methods: In 2016 and 2017, we identified all patients referred to our children’s hospital with previous surveys performed and read at a community hospital by an outside radiologist. We excluded patients older than 3 years and studies performed at a children’s hospital. The surveys were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist with the printed outside report available. Surveys with disagreement between outside read and pediatric radiologist read were reviewed by a second pediatric radiologist. A disagreement in the second read included only definite discrepant findings agreed upon by both pediatric radiologists. The Fisher exact test was performed to compare the ratio of discrepancies between readers in normal and abnormal surveys. Results: Two hundred twenty-five surveys were performed (120 male) at 62 referring hospitals, with a mean patient age of 10.5 months (range: 5 days-3 years). The outside read identified fractures in 104/225 (46.2%) surveys. Thirty-seven of the 225 (16.4%) contained discrepancies in interpretation (n=111). Most of these disagreements (29/37, 78.4%) resulted in a significant change in the report. There was a significant (P<0.0001) difference between disagreement rate in outside read negative (4/111, 3.2%) and positive surveys (34/104, 31.7%). The second read identified additional fractures in 22/225 (9.8%) of the surveys and disagreed with first-read fractures in 17/256 (7.6%). Four of 19 (21.1%) classic metaphyseal lesions diagnosed by the outside read were normal variants; 18 classic metaphyseal lesions were missed by the outside read. Conclusions: This study supports second reads by pediatric radiologists of skeletal surveys for non-accidental trauma.

AB - Background: Fractures are the second most common finding in non-accidental trauma after cutaneous signs. Interpreting skeletal surveys could be challenging as some fractures are subtle and due to anatomical variations that can mimic injuries. Objective: To determine the effect of a second read by a pediatric radiologist of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental trauma initially read at referring hospitals by general radiologists. Materials and methods: In 2016 and 2017, we identified all patients referred to our children’s hospital with previous surveys performed and read at a community hospital by an outside radiologist. We excluded patients older than 3 years and studies performed at a children’s hospital. The surveys were reviewed by a pediatric radiologist with the printed outside report available. Surveys with disagreement between outside read and pediatric radiologist read were reviewed by a second pediatric radiologist. A disagreement in the second read included only definite discrepant findings agreed upon by both pediatric radiologists. The Fisher exact test was performed to compare the ratio of discrepancies between readers in normal and abnormal surveys. Results: Two hundred twenty-five surveys were performed (120 male) at 62 referring hospitals, with a mean patient age of 10.5 months (range: 5 days-3 years). The outside read identified fractures in 104/225 (46.2%) surveys. Thirty-seven of the 225 (16.4%) contained discrepancies in interpretation (n=111). Most of these disagreements (29/37, 78.4%) resulted in a significant change in the report. There was a significant (P<0.0001) difference between disagreement rate in outside read negative (4/111, 3.2%) and positive surveys (34/104, 31.7%). The second read identified additional fractures in 22/225 (9.8%) of the surveys and disagreed with first-read fractures in 17/256 (7.6%). Four of 19 (21.1%) classic metaphyseal lesions diagnosed by the outside read were normal variants; 18 classic metaphyseal lesions were missed by the outside read. Conclusions: This study supports second reads by pediatric radiologists of skeletal surveys for non-accidental trauma.

KW - Children

KW - Classic metaphyseal lesion

KW - Fractures

KW - Non-accidental trauma

KW - Pediatric radiology

KW - Radiography

KW - Second reads

KW - Skeletal survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055869095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055869095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00247-018-4276-8

DO - 10.1007/s00247-018-4276-8

M3 - Article

JO - Pediatric Radiology

JF - Pediatric Radiology

SN - 0301-0449

ER -