The Association Between Peer and Self-Assessments and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students

Leslie A. Hoffman, Ronald L. Shew, Toan Vu, James J. Brokaw, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Peer and self-assessments are widely used to assess professionalism during medical school as part of a multisource feedback model. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between peer and self-assessments and professionalism lapses at a large medical school. A retrospective case–control study design was used to compare peer and self-assessment scores from Years 1 to 3 of medical school for students who had been cited for professionalism lapses during medical school (case group; n = 78) with those of a randomly selected control group (n = 230). Students in the case group had significantly lower peer assessment scores than students in the control group during all 3 years. Year 3 peer assessment scores showed the greatest difference (cases = 7.81 ± 0.65, controls = 8.22 ± 0.34, p <.01). Students with lower peer assessment scores were also significantly more likely to have been cited for a professionalism lapse (odds ratio = 6.25, 95% CI [3.13, 11.11], p <.01). This study reinforces the value of peer assessments of professionalism, which may be useful to help identify students who may be at risk for professionalism lapses during medical school.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-243
Number of pages25
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Medical Schools
Students
Control Groups
Professionalism
Self-Assessment
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • case–control studies
  • logistic models
  • medical
  • peer review
  • professionalism
  • schools
  • self-assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The Association Between Peer and Self-Assessments and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students. / Hoffman, Leslie A.; Shew, Ronald L.; Vu, Toan; Brokaw, James J.; Frankel, Richard.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 219-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae3fe40ac8d8493f85f8124074c1ab53,
title = "The Association Between Peer and Self-Assessments and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students",
abstract = "Peer and self-assessments are widely used to assess professionalism during medical school as part of a multisource feedback model. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between peer and self-assessments and professionalism lapses at a large medical school. A retrospective case–control study design was used to compare peer and self-assessment scores from Years 1 to 3 of medical school for students who had been cited for professionalism lapses during medical school (case group; n = 78) with those of a randomly selected control group (n = 230). Students in the case group had significantly lower peer assessment scores than students in the control group during all 3 years. Year 3 peer assessment scores showed the greatest difference (cases = 7.81 ± 0.65, controls = 8.22 ± 0.34, p <.01). Students with lower peer assessment scores were also significantly more likely to have been cited for a professionalism lapse (odds ratio = 6.25, 95{\%} CI [3.13, 11.11], p <.01). This study reinforces the value of peer assessments of professionalism, which may be useful to help identify students who may be at risk for professionalism lapses during medical school.",
keywords = "case–control studies, logistic models, medical, peer review, professionalism, schools, self-assessment",
author = "Hoffman, {Leslie A.} and Shew, {Ronald L.} and Toan Vu and Brokaw, {James J.} and Richard Frankel",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0163278717702191",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "219--243",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Association Between Peer and Self-Assessments and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students

AU - Hoffman, Leslie A.

AU - Shew, Ronald L.

AU - Vu, Toan

AU - Brokaw, James J.

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Peer and self-assessments are widely used to assess professionalism during medical school as part of a multisource feedback model. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between peer and self-assessments and professionalism lapses at a large medical school. A retrospective case–control study design was used to compare peer and self-assessment scores from Years 1 to 3 of medical school for students who had been cited for professionalism lapses during medical school (case group; n = 78) with those of a randomly selected control group (n = 230). Students in the case group had significantly lower peer assessment scores than students in the control group during all 3 years. Year 3 peer assessment scores showed the greatest difference (cases = 7.81 ± 0.65, controls = 8.22 ± 0.34, p <.01). Students with lower peer assessment scores were also significantly more likely to have been cited for a professionalism lapse (odds ratio = 6.25, 95% CI [3.13, 11.11], p <.01). This study reinforces the value of peer assessments of professionalism, which may be useful to help identify students who may be at risk for professionalism lapses during medical school.

AB - Peer and self-assessments are widely used to assess professionalism during medical school as part of a multisource feedback model. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between peer and self-assessments and professionalism lapses at a large medical school. A retrospective case–control study design was used to compare peer and self-assessment scores from Years 1 to 3 of medical school for students who had been cited for professionalism lapses during medical school (case group; n = 78) with those of a randomly selected control group (n = 230). Students in the case group had significantly lower peer assessment scores than students in the control group during all 3 years. Year 3 peer assessment scores showed the greatest difference (cases = 7.81 ± 0.65, controls = 8.22 ± 0.34, p <.01). Students with lower peer assessment scores were also significantly more likely to have been cited for a professionalism lapse (odds ratio = 6.25, 95% CI [3.13, 11.11], p <.01). This study reinforces the value of peer assessments of professionalism, which may be useful to help identify students who may be at risk for professionalism lapses during medical school.

KW - case–control studies

KW - logistic models

KW - medical

KW - peer review

KW - professionalism

KW - schools

KW - self-assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018740901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018740901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0163278717702191

DO - 10.1177/0163278717702191

M3 - Article

C2 - 28705026

AN - SCOPUS:85018740901

VL - 40

SP - 219

EP - 243

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 2

ER -