The benefits of health information exchange: An updated systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Widespread health information exchange (HIE) is a national objective motivated by the promise of improved care and a reduction in costs. Previous reviews have found little rigorous evidence that HIE positively affects these anticipated benefits. However, early studies of HIE were methodologically limited. The purpose of the current study is to review the recent literature on the impact of HIE. Methods: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to conduct our systematic review. PubMed and Scopus databases were used to identify empirical articles that evaluated HIE in the context of a health care outcome. Results: Our search strategy identified 24 articles that included 63 individual analyses. The majority of the studies were from the United States representing 9 states; and about 40% of the included analyses occurred in a handful of HIEs from the state of New York. Seven of the 24 studies used designs suitable for causal inference and all reported some beneficial effect from HIE; none reported adverse effects. Conclusions: The current systematic review found that studies with more rigorous designs all reported benefits from HIE. Such benefits include fewer duplicated procedures, reduced imaging, lower costs, and improved patient safety. We also found that studies evaluating community HIEs were more likely to find benefits than studies that evaluated enterprise HIEs or vendor-mediated exchanges. Overall, these finding bode well for the HIEs ability to deliver on anticipated improvements in care delivery and reduction in costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1259-1265
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Safety
Health Information Exchange
PubMed
Meta-Analysis
Databases
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • electronic health records
  • health care costs
  • health information exchange
  • health information technology
  • medical informatics
  • quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

The benefits of health information exchange : An updated systematic review. / Menachemi, Nir; Rahurkar, Saurabh; Harle, Christopher A.; Vest, Joshua R.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 25, No. 9, 01.01.2018, p. 1259-1265.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3f8ec8bffdf44f58a99d977680d5ad30,
title = "The benefits of health information exchange: An updated systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: Widespread health information exchange (HIE) is a national objective motivated by the promise of improved care and a reduction in costs. Previous reviews have found little rigorous evidence that HIE positively affects these anticipated benefits. However, early studies of HIE were methodologically limited. The purpose of the current study is to review the recent literature on the impact of HIE. Methods: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to conduct our systematic review. PubMed and Scopus databases were used to identify empirical articles that evaluated HIE in the context of a health care outcome. Results: Our search strategy identified 24 articles that included 63 individual analyses. The majority of the studies were from the United States representing 9 states; and about 40{\%} of the included analyses occurred in a handful of HIEs from the state of New York. Seven of the 24 studies used designs suitable for causal inference and all reported some beneficial effect from HIE; none reported adverse effects. Conclusions: The current systematic review found that studies with more rigorous designs all reported benefits from HIE. Such benefits include fewer duplicated procedures, reduced imaging, lower costs, and improved patient safety. We also found that studies evaluating community HIEs were more likely to find benefits than studies that evaluated enterprise HIEs or vendor-mediated exchanges. Overall, these finding bode well for the HIEs ability to deliver on anticipated improvements in care delivery and reduction in costs.",
keywords = "electronic health records, health care costs, health information exchange, health information technology, medical informatics, quality of health care",
author = "Nir Menachemi and Saurabh Rahurkar and Harle, {Christopher A.} and Vest, {Joshua R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocy035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1259--1265",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The benefits of health information exchange

T2 - An updated systematic review

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Rahurkar, Saurabh

AU - Harle, Christopher A.

AU - Vest, Joshua R.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Widespread health information exchange (HIE) is a national objective motivated by the promise of improved care and a reduction in costs. Previous reviews have found little rigorous evidence that HIE positively affects these anticipated benefits. However, early studies of HIE were methodologically limited. The purpose of the current study is to review the recent literature on the impact of HIE. Methods: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to conduct our systematic review. PubMed and Scopus databases were used to identify empirical articles that evaluated HIE in the context of a health care outcome. Results: Our search strategy identified 24 articles that included 63 individual analyses. The majority of the studies were from the United States representing 9 states; and about 40% of the included analyses occurred in a handful of HIEs from the state of New York. Seven of the 24 studies used designs suitable for causal inference and all reported some beneficial effect from HIE; none reported adverse effects. Conclusions: The current systematic review found that studies with more rigorous designs all reported benefits from HIE. Such benefits include fewer duplicated procedures, reduced imaging, lower costs, and improved patient safety. We also found that studies evaluating community HIEs were more likely to find benefits than studies that evaluated enterprise HIEs or vendor-mediated exchanges. Overall, these finding bode well for the HIEs ability to deliver on anticipated improvements in care delivery and reduction in costs.

AB - Objective: Widespread health information exchange (HIE) is a national objective motivated by the promise of improved care and a reduction in costs. Previous reviews have found little rigorous evidence that HIE positively affects these anticipated benefits. However, early studies of HIE were methodologically limited. The purpose of the current study is to review the recent literature on the impact of HIE. Methods: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to conduct our systematic review. PubMed and Scopus databases were used to identify empirical articles that evaluated HIE in the context of a health care outcome. Results: Our search strategy identified 24 articles that included 63 individual analyses. The majority of the studies were from the United States representing 9 states; and about 40% of the included analyses occurred in a handful of HIEs from the state of New York. Seven of the 24 studies used designs suitable for causal inference and all reported some beneficial effect from HIE; none reported adverse effects. Conclusions: The current systematic review found that studies with more rigorous designs all reported benefits from HIE. Such benefits include fewer duplicated procedures, reduced imaging, lower costs, and improved patient safety. We also found that studies evaluating community HIEs were more likely to find benefits than studies that evaluated enterprise HIEs or vendor-mediated exchanges. Overall, these finding bode well for the HIEs ability to deliver on anticipated improvements in care delivery and reduction in costs.

KW - electronic health records

KW - health care costs

KW - health information exchange

KW - health information technology

KW - medical informatics

KW - quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052311447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052311447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocy035

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocy035

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29718258

AN - SCOPUS:85052311447

VL - 25

SP - 1259

EP - 1265

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 9

ER -