The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters

Yuri A. Pishchalnikov, James A. McAteer, R. Jason VonDerHaar, Irina V. Pishchalnikova, James Williams

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The focal width of a lithotripter is a measure of the diameter of its focal zone, the region where acoustic pressures are at least half the maximum positive pressure generated at a given power level. Different lithotripters have different focal widths. The Dornier HM3, for example, has a focal width of ∼10-12mm and for many years this was the widest focal zone among clinical machines. Electromagnetic lithotripters tend to have narrower focal zones, in the range of ∼4-6mm. Recent studies suggesting that focal width plays an important role in stone breakage prompted this assessment of two electromagnetic lithotripters. Acoustical mapping using a fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH-500) and breakage of U-30 gypsum model stones were used to compare a conventional lithotripter (Dornier DoLi-50) and a broad focal zone device (XiXin XX-ES). FOPH mapping characterized the focal width of the DoLi to be about 5mm and that of the XX-ES to be much wider (∼18mm). For stone breakage experiments the DoLi was fired at power level 3 (mid-range) and the XX-ES was operated at the recommended clinical setting of 9.3 kV. Both lithotripters were fired at 60 SW/min. U-30 model stones held in a 2mm mesh basket were positioned at the clinical target point on the acoustic axis and at 5mm steps laterally, and the number of SW's to complete fragmentation was counted. Breakage onaxis was similar for the two machines (DoLi 676±105 SW's versus XX-ES 644±123 SW's, p>0.6), but at 15mm the DoLi required nearly twice the number of SW's as the XX-ES (DoLi 3006±780 SW's versus 1726±972 SW's, p<0.006). This demonstrates that a broad focal zone lithotripter is more effective in breaking stones off axis and supports the idea that focal width is an important feature, likely to be relevant in the clinical setting where respiratory motion may limit the effectiveness of narrow focal zone machines.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIP Conference Proceedings
Pages238-242
Number of pages5
Volume1049
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event2nd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium - Indianapolis, IN, United States
Duration: Apr 17 2008Apr 18 2008

Other

Other2nd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium
CountryUnited States
CityIndianapolis, IN
Period4/17/084/18/08

Fingerprint

rocks
baskets
electromagnetism
gypsum
acoustics
hydrophones
mesh
fiber optics
fragmentation
probes

Keywords

  • Local width
  • Peak pressure
  • Shock wave lithotripsy
  • Stone breakage efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Pishchalnikov, Y. A., McAteer, J. A., VonDerHaar, R. J., Pishchalnikova, I. V., & Williams, J. (2008). The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1049, pp. 238-242) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2998028

The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters. / Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.; McAteer, James A.; VonDerHaar, R. Jason; Pishchalnikova, Irina V.; Williams, James.

AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1049 2008. p. 238-242.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Pishchalnikov, YA, McAteer, JA, VonDerHaar, RJ, Pishchalnikova, IV & Williams, J 2008, The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters. in AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 1049, pp. 238-242, 2nd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, United States, 4/17/08. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2998028
Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, VonDerHaar RJ, Pishchalnikova IV, Williams J. The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters. In AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1049. 2008. p. 238-242 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2998028
Pishchalnikov, Yuri A. ; McAteer, James A. ; VonDerHaar, R. Jason ; Pishchalnikova, Irina V. ; Williams, James. / The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1049 2008. pp. 238-242
@inproceedings{a6f92330ec0e47d388a74070d84ff297,
title = "The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters",
abstract = "The focal width of a lithotripter is a measure of the diameter of its focal zone, the region where acoustic pressures are at least half the maximum positive pressure generated at a given power level. Different lithotripters have different focal widths. The Dornier HM3, for example, has a focal width of ∼10-12mm and for many years this was the widest focal zone among clinical machines. Electromagnetic lithotripters tend to have narrower focal zones, in the range of ∼4-6mm. Recent studies suggesting that focal width plays an important role in stone breakage prompted this assessment of two electromagnetic lithotripters. Acoustical mapping using a fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH-500) and breakage of U-30 gypsum model stones were used to compare a conventional lithotripter (Dornier DoLi-50) and a broad focal zone device (XiXin XX-ES). FOPH mapping characterized the focal width of the DoLi to be about 5mm and that of the XX-ES to be much wider (∼18mm). For stone breakage experiments the DoLi was fired at power level 3 (mid-range) and the XX-ES was operated at the recommended clinical setting of 9.3 kV. Both lithotripters were fired at 60 SW/min. U-30 model stones held in a 2mm mesh basket were positioned at the clinical target point on the acoustic axis and at 5mm steps laterally, and the number of SW's to complete fragmentation was counted. Breakage onaxis was similar for the two machines (DoLi 676±105 SW's versus XX-ES 644±123 SW's, p>0.6), but at 15mm the DoLi required nearly twice the number of SW's as the XX-ES (DoLi 3006±780 SW's versus 1726±972 SW's, p<0.006). This demonstrates that a broad focal zone lithotripter is more effective in breaking stones off axis and supports the idea that focal width is an important feature, likely to be relevant in the clinical setting where respiratory motion may limit the effectiveness of narrow focal zone machines.",
keywords = "Local width, Peak pressure, Shock wave lithotripsy, Stone breakage efficiency",
author = "Pishchalnikov, {Yuri A.} and McAteer, {James A.} and VonDerHaar, {R. Jason} and Pishchalnikova, {Irina V.} and James Williams",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1063/1.2998028",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780735405776",
volume = "1049",
pages = "238--242",
booktitle = "AIP Conference Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The characteristics of broad and narrow focal zone lithotripters

AU - Pishchalnikov, Yuri A.

AU - McAteer, James A.

AU - VonDerHaar, R. Jason

AU - Pishchalnikova, Irina V.

AU - Williams, James

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The focal width of a lithotripter is a measure of the diameter of its focal zone, the region where acoustic pressures are at least half the maximum positive pressure generated at a given power level. Different lithotripters have different focal widths. The Dornier HM3, for example, has a focal width of ∼10-12mm and for many years this was the widest focal zone among clinical machines. Electromagnetic lithotripters tend to have narrower focal zones, in the range of ∼4-6mm. Recent studies suggesting that focal width plays an important role in stone breakage prompted this assessment of two electromagnetic lithotripters. Acoustical mapping using a fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH-500) and breakage of U-30 gypsum model stones were used to compare a conventional lithotripter (Dornier DoLi-50) and a broad focal zone device (XiXin XX-ES). FOPH mapping characterized the focal width of the DoLi to be about 5mm and that of the XX-ES to be much wider (∼18mm). For stone breakage experiments the DoLi was fired at power level 3 (mid-range) and the XX-ES was operated at the recommended clinical setting of 9.3 kV. Both lithotripters were fired at 60 SW/min. U-30 model stones held in a 2mm mesh basket were positioned at the clinical target point on the acoustic axis and at 5mm steps laterally, and the number of SW's to complete fragmentation was counted. Breakage onaxis was similar for the two machines (DoLi 676±105 SW's versus XX-ES 644±123 SW's, p>0.6), but at 15mm the DoLi required nearly twice the number of SW's as the XX-ES (DoLi 3006±780 SW's versus 1726±972 SW's, p<0.006). This demonstrates that a broad focal zone lithotripter is more effective in breaking stones off axis and supports the idea that focal width is an important feature, likely to be relevant in the clinical setting where respiratory motion may limit the effectiveness of narrow focal zone machines.

AB - The focal width of a lithotripter is a measure of the diameter of its focal zone, the region where acoustic pressures are at least half the maximum positive pressure generated at a given power level. Different lithotripters have different focal widths. The Dornier HM3, for example, has a focal width of ∼10-12mm and for many years this was the widest focal zone among clinical machines. Electromagnetic lithotripters tend to have narrower focal zones, in the range of ∼4-6mm. Recent studies suggesting that focal width plays an important role in stone breakage prompted this assessment of two electromagnetic lithotripters. Acoustical mapping using a fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH-500) and breakage of U-30 gypsum model stones were used to compare a conventional lithotripter (Dornier DoLi-50) and a broad focal zone device (XiXin XX-ES). FOPH mapping characterized the focal width of the DoLi to be about 5mm and that of the XX-ES to be much wider (∼18mm). For stone breakage experiments the DoLi was fired at power level 3 (mid-range) and the XX-ES was operated at the recommended clinical setting of 9.3 kV. Both lithotripters were fired at 60 SW/min. U-30 model stones held in a 2mm mesh basket were positioned at the clinical target point on the acoustic axis and at 5mm steps laterally, and the number of SW's to complete fragmentation was counted. Breakage onaxis was similar for the two machines (DoLi 676±105 SW's versus XX-ES 644±123 SW's, p>0.6), but at 15mm the DoLi required nearly twice the number of SW's as the XX-ES (DoLi 3006±780 SW's versus 1726±972 SW's, p<0.006). This demonstrates that a broad focal zone lithotripter is more effective in breaking stones off axis and supports the idea that focal width is an important feature, likely to be relevant in the clinical setting where respiratory motion may limit the effectiveness of narrow focal zone machines.

KW - Local width

KW - Peak pressure

KW - Shock wave lithotripsy

KW - Stone breakage efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54049128232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54049128232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.2998028

DO - 10.1063/1.2998028

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:54049128232

SN - 9780735405776

VL - 1049

SP - 238

EP - 242

BT - AIP Conference Proceedings

ER -