The charismatic journey of mastery learning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A collection of articles in this issue examine the concept of mastery learning, underscoring that our journey is from a 19th-century construct for assuring skill development (i.e., completing a schedule of rotations driven by the calendar) to a 21st-century sequence of learning opportunities focused on acquiring mastery of special key competencies within clerkships or other activities. Mastery learning processes and standards have the potential to clarify learning goals and competency measurement issues in medical education. Although mastery learning methods originally focused on developing learners' competency with skillful procedures, the author of this Commentary posits that mastery learning methods may be usefully applied more extensively to broader domains of skillful practice, especially those practices that can be linked to outcomes of care. The transition to mastery-focused criteria for educational advancement is laudatory, but challenges will be encountered in the journey to mastery education. The author examines several of these potential challenges, including expansion of mastery learning approaches to effective but relational clinician advice-giving and counseling behaviors, developing criteria for choosing critical competencies that can be linked to outcomes, avoiding a excessively fragmented approach to mastery measurement, and dealing with "educational comorbidity.".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1442-1444
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume90
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Learning
learning method
learning
comorbidity
counseling
learning process
education
Medical Education
Comorbidity
Counseling
Appointments and Schedules
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

The charismatic journey of mastery learning. / Inui, Thomas.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 1442-1444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Inui, Thomas. / The charismatic journey of mastery learning. In: Academic Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 90, No. 11. pp. 1442-1444.
@article{2a6f45f590254bb9b625b52b35c83803,
title = "The charismatic journey of mastery learning",
abstract = "A collection of articles in this issue examine the concept of mastery learning, underscoring that our journey is from a 19th-century construct for assuring skill development (i.e., completing a schedule of rotations driven by the calendar) to a 21st-century sequence of learning opportunities focused on acquiring mastery of special key competencies within clerkships or other activities. Mastery learning processes and standards have the potential to clarify learning goals and competency measurement issues in medical education. Although mastery learning methods originally focused on developing learners' competency with skillful procedures, the author of this Commentary posits that mastery learning methods may be usefully applied more extensively to broader domains of skillful practice, especially those practices that can be linked to outcomes of care. The transition to mastery-focused criteria for educational advancement is laudatory, but challenges will be encountered in the journey to mastery education. The author examines several of these potential challenges, including expansion of mastery learning approaches to effective but relational clinician advice-giving and counseling behaviors, developing criteria for choosing critical competencies that can be linked to outcomes, avoiding a excessively fragmented approach to mastery measurement, and dealing with {"}educational comorbidity.{"}.",
author = "Thomas Inui",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000915",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1442--1444",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The charismatic journey of mastery learning

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - A collection of articles in this issue examine the concept of mastery learning, underscoring that our journey is from a 19th-century construct for assuring skill development (i.e., completing a schedule of rotations driven by the calendar) to a 21st-century sequence of learning opportunities focused on acquiring mastery of special key competencies within clerkships or other activities. Mastery learning processes and standards have the potential to clarify learning goals and competency measurement issues in medical education. Although mastery learning methods originally focused on developing learners' competency with skillful procedures, the author of this Commentary posits that mastery learning methods may be usefully applied more extensively to broader domains of skillful practice, especially those practices that can be linked to outcomes of care. The transition to mastery-focused criteria for educational advancement is laudatory, but challenges will be encountered in the journey to mastery education. The author examines several of these potential challenges, including expansion of mastery learning approaches to effective but relational clinician advice-giving and counseling behaviors, developing criteria for choosing critical competencies that can be linked to outcomes, avoiding a excessively fragmented approach to mastery measurement, and dealing with "educational comorbidity.".

AB - A collection of articles in this issue examine the concept of mastery learning, underscoring that our journey is from a 19th-century construct for assuring skill development (i.e., completing a schedule of rotations driven by the calendar) to a 21st-century sequence of learning opportunities focused on acquiring mastery of special key competencies within clerkships or other activities. Mastery learning processes and standards have the potential to clarify learning goals and competency measurement issues in medical education. Although mastery learning methods originally focused on developing learners' competency with skillful procedures, the author of this Commentary posits that mastery learning methods may be usefully applied more extensively to broader domains of skillful practice, especially those practices that can be linked to outcomes of care. The transition to mastery-focused criteria for educational advancement is laudatory, but challenges will be encountered in the journey to mastery education. The author examines several of these potential challenges, including expansion of mastery learning approaches to effective but relational clinician advice-giving and counseling behaviors, developing criteria for choosing critical competencies that can be linked to outcomes, avoiding a excessively fragmented approach to mastery measurement, and dealing with "educational comorbidity.".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945473671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945473671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000915

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000915

M3 - Article

C2 - 26375264

AN - SCOPUS:84945473671

VL - 90

SP - 1442

EP - 1444

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 11

ER -