The cost-effectiveness of intensive postdischarge care: A randomized trial

Morris Weinberger, David M. Smith, Barry P. Katz, Patricia S. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Scopus citations


This study tested the hypothesis that increasing the intensity of outpatient care for patients discharged from the hospital could lower their subsequent inpatient and total health-care costs. At discharge, 1, 001 patients were stratified by risk of readmission (low, medium, or high) and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Discharge information (summaries, medications, and postdischarge needs) was provided to outpatient nurses who monitored intervention patients closely and attempted to resolve their problems. Intervention patients also received appointment reminders, and missed visits were promptly rescheduled. The cost of the intervention was $5.20 per patient per month. High-risk patients in the intervention group had significantly higher outpatient costs ($131/month vs. $107/month; P = 0.02), but lower inpatient costs ($535/month vs. $800/month; P = 0.02) than high-risk patients in the control group. Reduced inpatient costs in the high-risk intervention group were attributed to shorter, less intensive hospital stays. In conclusion, increasing ambulatory care resources after hospital discharge for high-risk patients may reduce health-care costs associated with readmission to the hospital.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1092-1102
Number of pages11
JournalMedical care
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1988


  • Ambulatory care
  • Discharge planning
  • Health-care costs
  • Patient readmission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The cost-effectiveness of intensive postdischarge care: A randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this