The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care

W. M. Tierney, Paul Dexter, G. P. Gramelspacher, A. J. Perkins, X. H. Zhou, F. D. Wolinsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discussions of end-of-life care should be held prior to acute, disabling events. Many barriers to having such discussions during primary care exist. These barriers include time constraints, communication difficulties, and perhaps physicians' anxiety that patients might react negatively to such discussions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of discussions of advance directives on patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of the use of computers to remind primary care physicians to discuss advance directives with their elderly, chronically ill patients. SETTING: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice affiliated with an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred eighty-six patients who were at least 75 years old, or at least 50 years old with serious underlying disease, and their 87 primary care physicians (57 residents, 30 faculty general internists) participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. We assessed patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and visits via interviews held in the waiting room after completed visits. Controlling for satisfaction at enrollment and physician, patient, and visit factors, discussing advance directives was associated with greater satisfaction with the physician (P = .052). At follOw-up, the strongest predictor of satisfaction with the primary care visit was having previously discussed advance directives with that physician (P = .004), with a trend toward greater visit satisfaction when discussions were held during that visit (P = .069). The percentage of patients scoring a visit as "excellent" increased from 34% for visits prior without advance directive discussions to 51% for visits with such discussions (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with chronic illnesses were more satisfied with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits when advanced directives were discussed. The improvement in visit satisfaction was substantial and persistent. This should encourage physicians to initiate such discussions to overcome communication barriers that might result in reduced patient satisfaction levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-40
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Advance Directives
Patient Satisfaction
Primary Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Physicians
Chronic Disease
Outpatients
Communication Barriers
Terminal Care
Urban Hospitals
Internal Medicine
Teaching Hospitals
Cohort Studies
Anxiety
Randomized Controlled Trials
Communication
Prospective Studies
Interviews

Keywords

  • Advance directives
  • End-of-life care
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care. / Tierney, W. M.; Dexter, Paul; Gramelspacher, G. P.; Perkins, A. J.; Zhou, X. H.; Wolinsky, F. D.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2001, p. 32-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tierney, W. M. ; Dexter, Paul ; Gramelspacher, G. P. ; Perkins, A. J. ; Zhou, X. H. ; Wolinsky, F. D. / The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 32-40.
@article{ee2d0412feeb4da8a15bea32dd8fbed2,
title = "The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Discussions of end-of-life care should be held prior to acute, disabling events. Many barriers to having such discussions during primary care exist. These barriers include time constraints, communication difficulties, and perhaps physicians' anxiety that patients might react negatively to such discussions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of discussions of advance directives on patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of the use of computers to remind primary care physicians to discuss advance directives with their elderly, chronically ill patients. SETTING: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice affiliated with an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred eighty-six patients who were at least 75 years old, or at least 50 years old with serious underlying disease, and their 87 primary care physicians (57 residents, 30 faculty general internists) participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. We assessed patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and visits via interviews held in the waiting room after completed visits. Controlling for satisfaction at enrollment and physician, patient, and visit factors, discussing advance directives was associated with greater satisfaction with the physician (P = .052). At follOw-up, the strongest predictor of satisfaction with the primary care visit was having previously discussed advance directives with that physician (P = .004), with a trend toward greater visit satisfaction when discussions were held during that visit (P = .069). The percentage of patients scoring a visit as {"}excellent{"} increased from 34{\%} for visits prior without advance directive discussions to 51{\%} for visits with such discussions (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with chronic illnesses were more satisfied with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits when advanced directives were discussed. The improvement in visit satisfaction was substantial and persistent. This should encourage physicians to initiate such discussions to overcome communication barriers that might result in reduced patient satisfaction levels.",
keywords = "Advance directives, End-of-life care, Patient satisfaction, Primary care",
author = "Tierney, {W. M.} and Paul Dexter and Gramelspacher, {G. P.} and Perkins, {A. J.} and Zhou, {X. H.} and Wolinsky, {F. D.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00215.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "32--40",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care

AU - Tierney, W. M.

AU - Dexter, Paul

AU - Gramelspacher, G. P.

AU - Perkins, A. J.

AU - Zhou, X. H.

AU - Wolinsky, F. D.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - BACKGROUND: Discussions of end-of-life care should be held prior to acute, disabling events. Many barriers to having such discussions during primary care exist. These barriers include time constraints, communication difficulties, and perhaps physicians' anxiety that patients might react negatively to such discussions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of discussions of advance directives on patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of the use of computers to remind primary care physicians to discuss advance directives with their elderly, chronically ill patients. SETTING: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice affiliated with an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred eighty-six patients who were at least 75 years old, or at least 50 years old with serious underlying disease, and their 87 primary care physicians (57 residents, 30 faculty general internists) participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. We assessed patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and visits via interviews held in the waiting room after completed visits. Controlling for satisfaction at enrollment and physician, patient, and visit factors, discussing advance directives was associated with greater satisfaction with the physician (P = .052). At follOw-up, the strongest predictor of satisfaction with the primary care visit was having previously discussed advance directives with that physician (P = .004), with a trend toward greater visit satisfaction when discussions were held during that visit (P = .069). The percentage of patients scoring a visit as "excellent" increased from 34% for visits prior without advance directive discussions to 51% for visits with such discussions (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with chronic illnesses were more satisfied with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits when advanced directives were discussed. The improvement in visit satisfaction was substantial and persistent. This should encourage physicians to initiate such discussions to overcome communication barriers that might result in reduced patient satisfaction levels.

AB - BACKGROUND: Discussions of end-of-life care should be held prior to acute, disabling events. Many barriers to having such discussions during primary care exist. These barriers include time constraints, communication difficulties, and perhaps physicians' anxiety that patients might react negatively to such discussions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of discussions of advance directives on patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients enrolled in a randomized, controlled trial of the use of computers to remind primary care physicians to discuss advance directives with their elderly, chronically ill patients. SETTING: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice affiliated with an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred eighty-six patients who were at least 75 years old, or at least 50 years old with serious underlying disease, and their 87 primary care physicians (57 residents, 30 faculty general internists) participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. We assessed patients' satisfaction with their primary care physicians and visits via interviews held in the waiting room after completed visits. Controlling for satisfaction at enrollment and physician, patient, and visit factors, discussing advance directives was associated with greater satisfaction with the physician (P = .052). At follOw-up, the strongest predictor of satisfaction with the primary care visit was having previously discussed advance directives with that physician (P = .004), with a trend toward greater visit satisfaction when discussions were held during that visit (P = .069). The percentage of patients scoring a visit as "excellent" increased from 34% for visits prior without advance directive discussions to 51% for visits with such discussions (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with chronic illnesses were more satisfied with their primary care physicians and outpatient visits when advanced directives were discussed. The improvement in visit satisfaction was substantial and persistent. This should encourage physicians to initiate such discussions to overcome communication barriers that might result in reduced patient satisfaction levels.

KW - Advance directives

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035154379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035154379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00215.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00215.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 32

EP - 40

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 1

ER -