The Effect of DynaCleft® on Cleft Width in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The specific aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the efficacy of DynaCleft® as a method of presurgical orthopedics with infants with a unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate who used an oral obturator. Study design: Data was collected from 25 infants all of comparable age diagnosed with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Eight patients used DynaCleft ® and an obturator (Group Alpha) and seventeen patients only had an obturator (Group Beta). Maxillary impression casts were obtained from each patient at the initial clinic visit and at the time of cleft lip repair. Differences in alveolar cleft width were compared between the two groups. Casts were measured twice by one observer using a digital caliper. Results: Group Alpha began treatment on an average age of 24.25 days and Group Beta an average of 15.35 days of age. The average cleft width of Group Alpha was 8.13 mm and after treatment it was 4.59 mm. The average cleft width of Group Beta was 8.09 mm and 6.92 mm after treatment. Results of paired t-tests and two-sample t-test showed that cleft width changes between the two groups were significant (P =.03). Conclusions: DynaCleft ® significantly decreased the size of the alveolar cleft width compared to infants who did not use it. Providers should consider using DynaCleft® for patients who may not have access to infant maxillary orthopedics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-445
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cleft Lip
Cleft Palate
Orthopedics
Ambulatory Care
Therapeutics
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • cleft lip and palate
  • presurgical orthopedics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

The Effect of DynaCleft® on Cleft Width in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. / Vinson, LaQuia.

In: Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.01.2017, p. 442-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0d1bbf20e634ebd8804f6988d28980a,
title = "The Effect of DynaCleft{\circledR} on Cleft Width in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients",
abstract = "Objective: The specific aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the efficacy of DynaCleft{\circledR} as a method of presurgical orthopedics with infants with a unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate who used an oral obturator. Study design: Data was collected from 25 infants all of comparable age diagnosed with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Eight patients used DynaCleft {\circledR} and an obturator (Group Alpha) and seventeen patients only had an obturator (Group Beta). Maxillary impression casts were obtained from each patient at the initial clinic visit and at the time of cleft lip repair. Differences in alveolar cleft width were compared between the two groups. Casts were measured twice by one observer using a digital caliper. Results: Group Alpha began treatment on an average age of 24.25 days and Group Beta an average of 15.35 days of age. The average cleft width of Group Alpha was 8.13 mm and after treatment it was 4.59 mm. The average cleft width of Group Beta was 8.09 mm and 6.92 mm after treatment. Results of paired t-tests and two-sample t-test showed that cleft width changes between the two groups were significant (P =.03). Conclusions: DynaCleft {\circledR} significantly decreased the size of the alveolar cleft width compared to infants who did not use it. Providers should consider using DynaCleft{\circledR} for patients who may not have access to infant maxillary orthopedics.",
keywords = "cleft lip and palate, presurgical orthopedics",
author = "LaQuia Vinson",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17796/1053-4628-41.6.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "442--445",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry",
issn = "1053-4628",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of DynaCleft® on Cleft Width in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

AU - Vinson, LaQuia

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objective: The specific aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the efficacy of DynaCleft® as a method of presurgical orthopedics with infants with a unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate who used an oral obturator. Study design: Data was collected from 25 infants all of comparable age diagnosed with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Eight patients used DynaCleft ® and an obturator (Group Alpha) and seventeen patients only had an obturator (Group Beta). Maxillary impression casts were obtained from each patient at the initial clinic visit and at the time of cleft lip repair. Differences in alveolar cleft width were compared between the two groups. Casts were measured twice by one observer using a digital caliper. Results: Group Alpha began treatment on an average age of 24.25 days and Group Beta an average of 15.35 days of age. The average cleft width of Group Alpha was 8.13 mm and after treatment it was 4.59 mm. The average cleft width of Group Beta was 8.09 mm and 6.92 mm after treatment. Results of paired t-tests and two-sample t-test showed that cleft width changes between the two groups were significant (P =.03). Conclusions: DynaCleft ® significantly decreased the size of the alveolar cleft width compared to infants who did not use it. Providers should consider using DynaCleft® for patients who may not have access to infant maxillary orthopedics.

AB - Objective: The specific aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the efficacy of DynaCleft® as a method of presurgical orthopedics with infants with a unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate who used an oral obturator. Study design: Data was collected from 25 infants all of comparable age diagnosed with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Eight patients used DynaCleft ® and an obturator (Group Alpha) and seventeen patients only had an obturator (Group Beta). Maxillary impression casts were obtained from each patient at the initial clinic visit and at the time of cleft lip repair. Differences in alveolar cleft width were compared between the two groups. Casts were measured twice by one observer using a digital caliper. Results: Group Alpha began treatment on an average age of 24.25 days and Group Beta an average of 15.35 days of age. The average cleft width of Group Alpha was 8.13 mm and after treatment it was 4.59 mm. The average cleft width of Group Beta was 8.09 mm and 6.92 mm after treatment. Results of paired t-tests and two-sample t-test showed that cleft width changes between the two groups were significant (P =.03). Conclusions: DynaCleft ® significantly decreased the size of the alveolar cleft width compared to infants who did not use it. Providers should consider using DynaCleft® for patients who may not have access to infant maxillary orthopedics.

KW - cleft lip and palate

KW - presurgical orthopedics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032702924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032702924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17796/1053-4628-41.6.4

DO - 10.17796/1053-4628-41.6.4

M3 - Article

C2 - 28937909

AN - SCOPUS:85032702924

VL - 41

SP - 442

EP - 445

JO - Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

JF - Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

SN - 1053-4628

IS - 6

ER -