The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care

Chris Harle, Nicole M. Marlow, Siegfried O.F. Schmidt, Jonathan J. Shuster, Alyson Listhaus, Roger B. Fillingim, Robert W. Hurley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Given its complexity, chronic noncancer pain presents an opportunity to use health information technology (IT) to improve care experiences. The objective of this study was to assess whether integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in an electronic health record (EHR) affects provider and patient satisfaction with chronic noncancer pain care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomized trial involving 4 family medicine clinics. METHODS: We enrolled primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients with chronic noncancer pain. In the first 7 months (education phase), PCPs in intervention practices received education on how to use PROs for pain care. In the second 7 months (PRO phase), patients in intervention practices reported pain-related outcomes on arrival at their visits. PROs were immediately reported to PCPs through the EHR. Control group PCPs provided usual care. We compared intervention and control practices in terms of provider and patient satisfaction with care. RESULTS: During the education phase, patients' mean ratings of their visits did not differ between control and intervention (9.33 vs 9.08; P = .20). During the PRO phase, patients' mean ratings did not differ between control and intervention (9.28 vs 9.01; P = .20). Similarly, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of provider satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering EHR-integrated PROs did not consistently improve patient or provider satisfaction. Positively, we found no evidence that the PRO tools negatively affected satisfaction. Future studies and technological innovations are needed to translate pointof- care health IT tools into improvements in patient and provider experiences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e403-e408
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume22
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Chronic Pain
Primary Health Care
Medical Informatics
Patient Satisfaction
Inventions
Education
Pain
Control Groups
Patient Education
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Harle, C., Marlow, N. M., Schmidt, S. O. F., Shuster, J. J., Listhaus, A., Fillingim, R. B., & Hurley, R. W. (2016). The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care. American Journal of Managed Care, 22(12), e403-e408.

The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care. / Harle, Chris; Marlow, Nicole M.; Schmidt, Siegfried O.F.; Shuster, Jonathan J.; Listhaus, Alyson; Fillingim, Roger B.; Hurley, Robert W.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 22, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. e403-e408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harle, C, Marlow, NM, Schmidt, SOF, Shuster, JJ, Listhaus, A, Fillingim, RB & Hurley, RW 2016, 'The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care', American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. e403-e408.
Harle C, Marlow NM, Schmidt SOF, Shuster JJ, Listhaus A, Fillingim RB et al. The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care. American Journal of Managed Care. 2016 Dec 1;22(12):e403-e408.
Harle, Chris ; Marlow, Nicole M. ; Schmidt, Siegfried O.F. ; Shuster, Jonathan J. ; Listhaus, Alyson ; Fillingim, Roger B. ; Hurley, Robert W. / The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 12. pp. e403-e408.
@article{086a3987e25245d3b62ffda7574ec0aa,
title = "The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Given its complexity, chronic noncancer pain presents an opportunity to use health information technology (IT) to improve care experiences. The objective of this study was to assess whether integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in an electronic health record (EHR) affects provider and patient satisfaction with chronic noncancer pain care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomized trial involving 4 family medicine clinics. METHODS: We enrolled primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients with chronic noncancer pain. In the first 7 months (education phase), PCPs in intervention practices received education on how to use PROs for pain care. In the second 7 months (PRO phase), patients in intervention practices reported pain-related outcomes on arrival at their visits. PROs were immediately reported to PCPs through the EHR. Control group PCPs provided usual care. We compared intervention and control practices in terms of provider and patient satisfaction with care. RESULTS: During the education phase, patients' mean ratings of their visits did not differ between control and intervention (9.33 vs 9.08; P = .20). During the PRO phase, patients' mean ratings did not differ between control and intervention (9.28 vs 9.01; P = .20). Similarly, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of provider satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering EHR-integrated PROs did not consistently improve patient or provider satisfaction. Positively, we found no evidence that the PRO tools negatively affected satisfaction. Future studies and technological innovations are needed to translate pointof- care health IT tools into improvements in patient and provider experiences.",
author = "Chris Harle and Marlow, {Nicole M.} and Schmidt, {Siegfried O.F.} and Shuster, {Jonathan J.} and Alyson Listhaus and Fillingim, {Roger B.} and Hurley, {Robert W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "e403--e408",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care

AU - Harle, Chris

AU - Marlow, Nicole M.

AU - Schmidt, Siegfried O.F.

AU - Shuster, Jonathan J.

AU - Listhaus, Alyson

AU - Fillingim, Roger B.

AU - Hurley, Robert W.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Given its complexity, chronic noncancer pain presents an opportunity to use health information technology (IT) to improve care experiences. The objective of this study was to assess whether integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in an electronic health record (EHR) affects provider and patient satisfaction with chronic noncancer pain care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomized trial involving 4 family medicine clinics. METHODS: We enrolled primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients with chronic noncancer pain. In the first 7 months (education phase), PCPs in intervention practices received education on how to use PROs for pain care. In the second 7 months (PRO phase), patients in intervention practices reported pain-related outcomes on arrival at their visits. PROs were immediately reported to PCPs through the EHR. Control group PCPs provided usual care. We compared intervention and control practices in terms of provider and patient satisfaction with care. RESULTS: During the education phase, patients' mean ratings of their visits did not differ between control and intervention (9.33 vs 9.08; P = .20). During the PRO phase, patients' mean ratings did not differ between control and intervention (9.28 vs 9.01; P = .20). Similarly, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of provider satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering EHR-integrated PROs did not consistently improve patient or provider satisfaction. Positively, we found no evidence that the PRO tools negatively affected satisfaction. Future studies and technological innovations are needed to translate pointof- care health IT tools into improvements in patient and provider experiences.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Given its complexity, chronic noncancer pain presents an opportunity to use health information technology (IT) to improve care experiences. The objective of this study was to assess whether integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in an electronic health record (EHR) affects provider and patient satisfaction with chronic noncancer pain care. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a pragmatic cluster randomized trial involving 4 family medicine clinics. METHODS: We enrolled primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients with chronic noncancer pain. In the first 7 months (education phase), PCPs in intervention practices received education on how to use PROs for pain care. In the second 7 months (PRO phase), patients in intervention practices reported pain-related outcomes on arrival at their visits. PROs were immediately reported to PCPs through the EHR. Control group PCPs provided usual care. We compared intervention and control practices in terms of provider and patient satisfaction with care. RESULTS: During the education phase, patients' mean ratings of their visits did not differ between control and intervention (9.33 vs 9.08; P = .20). During the PRO phase, patients' mean ratings did not differ between control and intervention (9.28 vs 9.01; P = .20). Similarly, there were no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of provider satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering EHR-integrated PROs did not consistently improve patient or provider satisfaction. Positively, we found no evidence that the PRO tools negatively affected satisfaction. Future studies and technological innovations are needed to translate pointof- care health IT tools into improvements in patient and provider experiences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007621898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007621898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 27982672

AN - SCOPUS:85007621898

VL - 22

SP - e403-e408

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 12

ER -