The effect of pH levels on nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics

Paul S. Sauget, Kelton Stewart, Thomas Katona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the force decay characteristics of nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics within the normal range of salivary pH levels. Materials and Methods: Two nonlatex groups and one latex quasi-control group were tested. Elastics were stretched to 15 mm and were held for 10 seconds (baseline), 4 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours in artificial saliva solutions with pH levels of 5.0, 6.0, and 7.5. Force magnitudes were measured at 25 mm of activation. Each specimen was used once. Measurements were assessed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The three-way interaction between group, pH, and time was not significant (P = .13); the group-by-pH interaction also was not significant (P = .70). However, pH-by-time (P = .0179) and group-by-time (P = .0001) interactions were significant. American Orthodontics nonlatex generated significantly higher loads than Auradonics nonlatex. American Orthodontics nonlatex produced significantly higher forces than American Orthodontics latex at 4, 8, and 12 hours, but not at 10 seconds. American Orthodontics latex was significantly stronger than Auradonics nonlatex at 10 seconds, but not at 4, 8, and 12 hours. Conclusions: No clinically significant correlation between pH and force decay was observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1070-1074
Number of pages5
JournalAngle Orthodontist
Volume81
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Latex
Orthodontics
Artificial Saliva
Analysis of Variance
Reference Values
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Force decay
  • Latex
  • Nonlatex
  • pH

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

The effect of pH levels on nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics. / Sauget, Paul S.; Stewart, Kelton; Katona, Thomas.

In: Angle Orthodontist, Vol. 81, No. 6, 11.2011, p. 1070-1074.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c36038d52fff4e048c2e2e76a393235b,
title = "The effect of pH levels on nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the force decay characteristics of nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics within the normal range of salivary pH levels. Materials and Methods: Two nonlatex groups and one latex quasi-control group were tested. Elastics were stretched to 15 mm and were held for 10 seconds (baseline), 4 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours in artificial saliva solutions with pH levels of 5.0, 6.0, and 7.5. Force magnitudes were measured at 25 mm of activation. Each specimen was used once. Measurements were assessed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The three-way interaction between group, pH, and time was not significant (P = .13); the group-by-pH interaction also was not significant (P = .70). However, pH-by-time (P = .0179) and group-by-time (P = .0001) interactions were significant. American Orthodontics nonlatex generated significantly higher loads than Auradonics nonlatex. American Orthodontics nonlatex produced significantly higher forces than American Orthodontics latex at 4, 8, and 12 hours, but not at 10 seconds. American Orthodontics latex was significantly stronger than Auradonics nonlatex at 10 seconds, but not at 4, 8, and 12 hours. Conclusions: No clinically significant correlation between pH and force decay was observed.",
keywords = "Force decay, Latex, Nonlatex, pH",
author = "Sauget, {Paul S.} and Kelton Stewart and Thomas Katona",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2319/011811-34.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "1070--1074",
journal = "Angle Orthodontist",
issn = "0003-3219",
publisher = "E H Angle Orthodontists Research & Education Foundation, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of pH levels on nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics

AU - Sauget, Paul S.

AU - Stewart, Kelton

AU - Katona, Thomas

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the force decay characteristics of nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics within the normal range of salivary pH levels. Materials and Methods: Two nonlatex groups and one latex quasi-control group were tested. Elastics were stretched to 15 mm and were held for 10 seconds (baseline), 4 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours in artificial saliva solutions with pH levels of 5.0, 6.0, and 7.5. Force magnitudes were measured at 25 mm of activation. Each specimen was used once. Measurements were assessed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The three-way interaction between group, pH, and time was not significant (P = .13); the group-by-pH interaction also was not significant (P = .70). However, pH-by-time (P = .0179) and group-by-time (P = .0001) interactions were significant. American Orthodontics nonlatex generated significantly higher loads than Auradonics nonlatex. American Orthodontics nonlatex produced significantly higher forces than American Orthodontics latex at 4, 8, and 12 hours, but not at 10 seconds. American Orthodontics latex was significantly stronger than Auradonics nonlatex at 10 seconds, but not at 4, 8, and 12 hours. Conclusions: No clinically significant correlation between pH and force decay was observed.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the force decay characteristics of nonlatex vs latex interarch elastics within the normal range of salivary pH levels. Materials and Methods: Two nonlatex groups and one latex quasi-control group were tested. Elastics were stretched to 15 mm and were held for 10 seconds (baseline), 4 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours in artificial saliva solutions with pH levels of 5.0, 6.0, and 7.5. Force magnitudes were measured at 25 mm of activation. Each specimen was used once. Measurements were assessed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The three-way interaction between group, pH, and time was not significant (P = .13); the group-by-pH interaction also was not significant (P = .70). However, pH-by-time (P = .0179) and group-by-time (P = .0001) interactions were significant. American Orthodontics nonlatex generated significantly higher loads than Auradonics nonlatex. American Orthodontics nonlatex produced significantly higher forces than American Orthodontics latex at 4, 8, and 12 hours, but not at 10 seconds. American Orthodontics latex was significantly stronger than Auradonics nonlatex at 10 seconds, but not at 4, 8, and 12 hours. Conclusions: No clinically significant correlation between pH and force decay was observed.

KW - Force decay

KW - Latex

KW - Nonlatex

KW - pH

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054854919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054854919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2319/011811-34.1

DO - 10.2319/011811-34.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 21609184

AN - SCOPUS:80054854919

VL - 81

SP - 1070

EP - 1074

JO - Angle Orthodontist

JF - Angle Orthodontist

SN - 0003-3219

IS - 6

ER -