The effects of fluoride treatment time and concentration on in vitro caries lesion demineralisation and remineralisation

Ali J. Maarafi, Anderson Hara, John A. Levon, T.M. Gabriel Chu, George J. Eckert, Frank Lippert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the possible interaction between fluoride treatment time and concentration on enamel caries lesion de-/remineralisation. Materials and Methods: The study design followed a three (fluoride concentration: 0, 275, 1250 ppm as sodium fluoride) x four (treatment time: 10, 30, 60, 120 s) factorial design. Caries lesions were created in bovine enamel and the extent of demineralisation determined using Vickers surface microhardness (VHN). Lesions were pH cycled (18 days) with the daily schedule consisting of two fluoride treatments, a 4-h demineralisation period and exposure to artificial saliva at all other times. VHN was determined again after pH cycling and changes to baseline values calculated (ΔVHN). Enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) was determined using the microbiopsy technique. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results: The concentration x treatment time interaction was significant for ΔVHN (p < 0.0001) and EFU (p = 0.0298). Dose-response relationships were observed for both variables for fluoride concentration and treatment time. ΔVHN: higher fluoride concentration compensated for shorter treatment time (e.g. ΔVHN [mean ± SD] = 85.5 ± 60.6 for 30 s with 1250 ppm fluoride vs ΔVHN = 84.3 ± 26.9 for 120s with 275 ppm fluoride). EFU data were similar but highlighted a greater ability to discern between fluoride concentrations (e.g. EFU = 4364 ± 1166 ppm vs 8538 ± 9531 ppm; above examples). Although ΔVHN and EFU correlated well (r = 0.723; p < 0.001), lesion demonstrated a greater ability to acquire fluoride than to remineralise. Conclusions: Behavioural aspects relating to caries can be studied in vitro, although model limitations must be considered. Adequate exposure times to cariostatic concentrations of fluoride are important in maximising caries prevention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-562
Number of pages6
JournalOral Health and Preventive Dentistry
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fluorides
Dental Enamel
In Vitro Techniques
Artificial Saliva
Sodium Fluoride
Analysis of Variance
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • Caries
  • Enamel
  • Fluoride
  • PH cycling
  • Remineralisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dental Hygiene

Cite this

The effects of fluoride treatment time and concentration on in vitro caries lesion demineralisation and remineralisation. / Maarafi, Ali J.; Hara, Anderson; Levon, John A.; Chu, T.M. Gabriel; Eckert, George J.; Lippert, Frank.

In: Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.01.2018, p. 557-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{31846fb408ab44189148fd0b6c7b8a60,
title = "The effects of fluoride treatment time and concentration on in vitro caries lesion demineralisation and remineralisation",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the possible interaction between fluoride treatment time and concentration on enamel caries lesion de-/remineralisation. Materials and Methods: The study design followed a three (fluoride concentration: 0, 275, 1250 ppm as sodium fluoride) x four (treatment time: 10, 30, 60, 120 s) factorial design. Caries lesions were created in bovine enamel and the extent of demineralisation determined using Vickers surface microhardness (VHN). Lesions were pH cycled (18 days) with the daily schedule consisting of two fluoride treatments, a 4-h demineralisation period and exposure to artificial saliva at all other times. VHN was determined again after pH cycling and changes to baseline values calculated (ΔVHN). Enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) was determined using the microbiopsy technique. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results: The concentration x treatment time interaction was significant for ΔVHN (p < 0.0001) and EFU (p = 0.0298). Dose-response relationships were observed for both variables for fluoride concentration and treatment time. ΔVHN: higher fluoride concentration compensated for shorter treatment time (e.g. ΔVHN [mean ± SD] = 85.5 ± 60.6 for 30 s with 1250 ppm fluoride vs ΔVHN = 84.3 ± 26.9 for 120s with 275 ppm fluoride). EFU data were similar but highlighted a greater ability to discern between fluoride concentrations (e.g. EFU = 4364 ± 1166 ppm vs 8538 ± 9531 ppm; above examples). Although ΔVHN and EFU correlated well (r = 0.723; p < 0.001), lesion demonstrated a greater ability to acquire fluoride than to remineralise. Conclusions: Behavioural aspects relating to caries can be studied in vitro, although model limitations must be considered. Adequate exposure times to cariostatic concentrations of fluoride are important in maximising caries prevention.",
keywords = "Caries, Enamel, Fluoride, PH cycling, Remineralisation",
author = "Maarafi, {Ali J.} and Anderson Hara and Levon, {John A.} and Chu, {T.M. Gabriel} and Eckert, {George J.} and Frank Lippert",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3290/j.ohpd.a41660",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "557--562",
journal = "Oral health & preventive dentistry",
issn = "1602-1622",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of fluoride treatment time and concentration on in vitro caries lesion demineralisation and remineralisation

AU - Maarafi, Ali J.

AU - Hara, Anderson

AU - Levon, John A.

AU - Chu, T.M. Gabriel

AU - Eckert, George J.

AU - Lippert, Frank

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the possible interaction between fluoride treatment time and concentration on enamel caries lesion de-/remineralisation. Materials and Methods: The study design followed a three (fluoride concentration: 0, 275, 1250 ppm as sodium fluoride) x four (treatment time: 10, 30, 60, 120 s) factorial design. Caries lesions were created in bovine enamel and the extent of demineralisation determined using Vickers surface microhardness (VHN). Lesions were pH cycled (18 days) with the daily schedule consisting of two fluoride treatments, a 4-h demineralisation period and exposure to artificial saliva at all other times. VHN was determined again after pH cycling and changes to baseline values calculated (ΔVHN). Enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) was determined using the microbiopsy technique. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results: The concentration x treatment time interaction was significant for ΔVHN (p < 0.0001) and EFU (p = 0.0298). Dose-response relationships were observed for both variables for fluoride concentration and treatment time. ΔVHN: higher fluoride concentration compensated for shorter treatment time (e.g. ΔVHN [mean ± SD] = 85.5 ± 60.6 for 30 s with 1250 ppm fluoride vs ΔVHN = 84.3 ± 26.9 for 120s with 275 ppm fluoride). EFU data were similar but highlighted a greater ability to discern between fluoride concentrations (e.g. EFU = 4364 ± 1166 ppm vs 8538 ± 9531 ppm; above examples). Although ΔVHN and EFU correlated well (r = 0.723; p < 0.001), lesion demonstrated a greater ability to acquire fluoride than to remineralise. Conclusions: Behavioural aspects relating to caries can be studied in vitro, although model limitations must be considered. Adequate exposure times to cariostatic concentrations of fluoride are important in maximising caries prevention.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the possible interaction between fluoride treatment time and concentration on enamel caries lesion de-/remineralisation. Materials and Methods: The study design followed a three (fluoride concentration: 0, 275, 1250 ppm as sodium fluoride) x four (treatment time: 10, 30, 60, 120 s) factorial design. Caries lesions were created in bovine enamel and the extent of demineralisation determined using Vickers surface microhardness (VHN). Lesions were pH cycled (18 days) with the daily schedule consisting of two fluoride treatments, a 4-h demineralisation period and exposure to artificial saliva at all other times. VHN was determined again after pH cycling and changes to baseline values calculated (ΔVHN). Enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) was determined using the microbiopsy technique. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results: The concentration x treatment time interaction was significant for ΔVHN (p < 0.0001) and EFU (p = 0.0298). Dose-response relationships were observed for both variables for fluoride concentration and treatment time. ΔVHN: higher fluoride concentration compensated for shorter treatment time (e.g. ΔVHN [mean ± SD] = 85.5 ± 60.6 for 30 s with 1250 ppm fluoride vs ΔVHN = 84.3 ± 26.9 for 120s with 275 ppm fluoride). EFU data were similar but highlighted a greater ability to discern between fluoride concentrations (e.g. EFU = 4364 ± 1166 ppm vs 8538 ± 9531 ppm; above examples). Although ΔVHN and EFU correlated well (r = 0.723; p < 0.001), lesion demonstrated a greater ability to acquire fluoride than to remineralise. Conclusions: Behavioural aspects relating to caries can be studied in vitro, although model limitations must be considered. Adequate exposure times to cariostatic concentrations of fluoride are important in maximising caries prevention.

KW - Caries

KW - Enamel

KW - Fluoride

KW - PH cycling

KW - Remineralisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058885999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058885999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3290/j.ohpd.a41660

DO - 10.3290/j.ohpd.a41660

M3 - Article

C2 - 30574610

AN - SCOPUS:85058885999

VL - 16

SP - 557

EP - 562

JO - Oral health & preventive dentistry

JF - Oral health & preventive dentistry

SN - 1602-1622

IS - 6

ER -