The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations

Reed G. Williams, Cathy J. Schwind, Gary Dunnington, John Fortune, David Rogers, Margaret Boehler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Prior investigations suggest that resident progress decisions by committee provide a broader perspective on performance and result in less grade inflation. There is countervailing concern that group dynamics may compromise quality of progress decisions. Purpose: To determine whether and how group dynamics compromise decision making about resident progress. Methods: Researchers recorded and analyzed participant comments during a resident progress committee meeting. End-of-rotation (EOR) evaluations were analyzed and compared to progress committee meeting results. Results: EOR and progress committee comments were similar in content. The ratio of specific to general comments was higher for EOR evaluations (5:1) than for progress committee meetings (2:1). EOR evaluation comments provided more supporting evidence for assertions. Individual progress committee participants did not dominate discussion or sway decision making. Participant progress committee meeting comments were consistent with their EOR comments failing to support the presence of progress committee meeting "feeding frenzies." Conclusions: Results suggest that progress committee meeting group dynamics do not seriously compromise the validity of resident progress decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

group dynamics
deliberation
resident
compromise
Decision Making
evaluation
Group Processes
Economic Inflation
decision making
inflation
Research Personnel
performance
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations. / Williams, Reed G.; Schwind, Cathy J.; Dunnington, Gary; Fortune, John; Rogers, David; Boehler, Margaret.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 2, 03.2005, p. 96-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Reed G. ; Schwind, Cathy J. ; Dunnington, Gary ; Fortune, John ; Rogers, David ; Boehler, Margaret. / The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations. In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 96-100.
@article{75ab03c1e54747f3ae61712c520811a9,
title = "The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations",
abstract = "Background: Prior investigations suggest that resident progress decisions by committee provide a broader perspective on performance and result in less grade inflation. There is countervailing concern that group dynamics may compromise quality of progress decisions. Purpose: To determine whether and how group dynamics compromise decision making about resident progress. Methods: Researchers recorded and analyzed participant comments during a resident progress committee meeting. End-of-rotation (EOR) evaluations were analyzed and compared to progress committee meeting results. Results: EOR and progress committee comments were similar in content. The ratio of specific to general comments was higher for EOR evaluations (5:1) than for progress committee meetings (2:1). EOR evaluation comments provided more supporting evidence for assertions. Individual progress committee participants did not dominate discussion or sway decision making. Participant progress committee meeting comments were consistent with their EOR comments failing to support the presence of progress committee meeting {"}feeding frenzies.{"} Conclusions: Results suggest that progress committee meeting group dynamics do not seriously compromise the validity of resident progress decisions.",
author = "Williams, {Reed G.} and Schwind, {Cathy J.} and Gary Dunnington and John Fortune and David Rogers and Margaret Boehler",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "96--100",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations

AU - Williams, Reed G.

AU - Schwind, Cathy J.

AU - Dunnington, Gary

AU - Fortune, John

AU - Rogers, David

AU - Boehler, Margaret

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Background: Prior investigations suggest that resident progress decisions by committee provide a broader perspective on performance and result in less grade inflation. There is countervailing concern that group dynamics may compromise quality of progress decisions. Purpose: To determine whether and how group dynamics compromise decision making about resident progress. Methods: Researchers recorded and analyzed participant comments during a resident progress committee meeting. End-of-rotation (EOR) evaluations were analyzed and compared to progress committee meeting results. Results: EOR and progress committee comments were similar in content. The ratio of specific to general comments was higher for EOR evaluations (5:1) than for progress committee meetings (2:1). EOR evaluation comments provided more supporting evidence for assertions. Individual progress committee participants did not dominate discussion or sway decision making. Participant progress committee meeting comments were consistent with their EOR comments failing to support the presence of progress committee meeting "feeding frenzies." Conclusions: Results suggest that progress committee meeting group dynamics do not seriously compromise the validity of resident progress decisions.

AB - Background: Prior investigations suggest that resident progress decisions by committee provide a broader perspective on performance and result in less grade inflation. There is countervailing concern that group dynamics may compromise quality of progress decisions. Purpose: To determine whether and how group dynamics compromise decision making about resident progress. Methods: Researchers recorded and analyzed participant comments during a resident progress committee meeting. End-of-rotation (EOR) evaluations were analyzed and compared to progress committee meeting results. Results: EOR and progress committee comments were similar in content. The ratio of specific to general comments was higher for EOR evaluations (5:1) than for progress committee meetings (2:1). EOR evaluation comments provided more supporting evidence for assertions. Individual progress committee participants did not dominate discussion or sway decision making. Participant progress committee meeting comments were consistent with their EOR comments failing to support the presence of progress committee meeting "feeding frenzies." Conclusions: Results suggest that progress committee meeting group dynamics do not seriously compromise the validity of resident progress decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844379351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17844379351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_1

DO - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_1

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 96

EP - 100

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 2

ER -