The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations

Reed G. Williams, Cathy J. Schwind, Gary L. Dunnington, John Fortune, David Rogers, Margaret Boehler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations


Background: Prior investigations suggest that resident progress decisions by committee provide a broader perspective on performance and result in less grade inflation. There is countervailing concern that group dynamics may compromise quality of progress decisions. Purpose: To determine whether and how group dynamics compromise decision making about resident progress. Methods: Researchers recorded and analyzed participant comments during a resident progress committee meeting. End-of-rotation (EOR) evaluations were analyzed and compared to progress committee meeting results. Results: EOR and progress committee comments were similar in content. The ratio of specific to general comments was higher for EOR evaluations (5:1) than for progress committee meetings (2:1). EOR evaluation comments provided more supporting evidence for assertions. Individual progress committee participants did not dominate discussion or sway decision making. Participant progress committee meeting comments were consistent with their EOR comments failing to support the presence of progress committee meeting "feeding frenzies." Conclusions: Results suggest that progress committee meeting group dynamics do not seriously compromise the validity of resident progress decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of group dynamics on resident progress committee deliberations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this