The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries

Justin Blackburn, Emily B. Levitan, Paul A. MacLennan, Cynthia Owsley, Gerald McGwin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the epidemiology and identify categories of agents involved in chemical eye injuries. Methods: Retrospective case series of consecutive cases of chemical eye injury presenting to the emergency department (ED) at a large eye hospital. Six-hundred and thirty-three patients presented to the ED between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 for treatment of 640 chemical eye injuries. Information was collected via medical record review and chemical agents were classified into logical categories based on the patient-reported intended use of the product. Demographic measures, month of service, work-related status, and visual acuity at presentation were described overall and by chemical agent category. Results: Males were more often observed than females (58.4% vs. 41.6%). The mean age across all categories was 33.6 years. More injuries were observed in warmer months. The mean visual acuity for all available injured eyes was 0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/30 Snellen). The most common categories of chemical agents were cleaning agents, personal care products, and automotive chemicals. Thirty-nine cases were observed as having misidentified a product which led to injury. Conclusion: Patterns of eye trauma resulting from chemicals differ by gender, across age groups, and during different months of the year. In most cases, chemical eye injuries do not threaten sight. Improvements in product labeling and design could represent an avenue to prevent some chemical eye injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-793
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Eye Research
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Eye Injuries
Epidemiology
Visual Acuity
Hospital Emergency Service
Wounds and Injuries
Product Labeling
Medical Records
Age Groups
Demography

Keywords

  • Chemical
  • Descriptive
  • Epidemiology
  • Household cleaner
  • Injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Blackburn, J., Levitan, E. B., MacLennan, P. A., Owsley, C., & McGwin, G. (2012). The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries. Current Eye Research, 37(9), 787-793. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.681747

The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries. / Blackburn, Justin; Levitan, Emily B.; MacLennan, Paul A.; Owsley, Cynthia; McGwin, Gerald.

In: Current Eye Research, Vol. 37, No. 9, 01.09.2012, p. 787-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Blackburn, J, Levitan, EB, MacLennan, PA, Owsley, C & McGwin, G 2012, 'The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries', Current Eye Research, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 787-793. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.681747
Blackburn J, Levitan EB, MacLennan PA, Owsley C, McGwin G. The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries. Current Eye Research. 2012 Sep 1;37(9):787-793. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.681747
Blackburn, Justin ; Levitan, Emily B. ; MacLennan, Paul A. ; Owsley, Cynthia ; McGwin, Gerald. / The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries. In: Current Eye Research. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 9. pp. 787-793.
@article{8c4558adbf464d5faabd2ff4413498d5,
title = "The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe the epidemiology and identify categories of agents involved in chemical eye injuries. Methods: Retrospective case series of consecutive cases of chemical eye injury presenting to the emergency department (ED) at a large eye hospital. Six-hundred and thirty-three patients presented to the ED between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 for treatment of 640 chemical eye injuries. Information was collected via medical record review and chemical agents were classified into logical categories based on the patient-reported intended use of the product. Demographic measures, month of service, work-related status, and visual acuity at presentation were described overall and by chemical agent category. Results: Males were more often observed than females (58.4{\%} vs. 41.6{\%}). The mean age across all categories was 33.6 years. More injuries were observed in warmer months. The mean visual acuity for all available injured eyes was 0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/30 Snellen). The most common categories of chemical agents were cleaning agents, personal care products, and automotive chemicals. Thirty-nine cases were observed as having misidentified a product which led to injury. Conclusion: Patterns of eye trauma resulting from chemicals differ by gender, across age groups, and during different months of the year. In most cases, chemical eye injuries do not threaten sight. Improvements in product labeling and design could represent an avenue to prevent some chemical eye injuries.",
keywords = "Chemical, Descriptive, Epidemiology, Household cleaner, Injury",
author = "Justin Blackburn and Levitan, {Emily B.} and MacLennan, {Paul A.} and Cynthia Owsley and Gerald McGwin",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/02713683.2012.681747",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "787--793",
journal = "Current Eye Research",
issn = "0271-3683",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The epidemiology of chemical eye injuries

AU - Blackburn, Justin

AU - Levitan, Emily B.

AU - MacLennan, Paul A.

AU - Owsley, Cynthia

AU - McGwin, Gerald

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To describe the epidemiology and identify categories of agents involved in chemical eye injuries. Methods: Retrospective case series of consecutive cases of chemical eye injury presenting to the emergency department (ED) at a large eye hospital. Six-hundred and thirty-three patients presented to the ED between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 for treatment of 640 chemical eye injuries. Information was collected via medical record review and chemical agents were classified into logical categories based on the patient-reported intended use of the product. Demographic measures, month of service, work-related status, and visual acuity at presentation were described overall and by chemical agent category. Results: Males were more often observed than females (58.4% vs. 41.6%). The mean age across all categories was 33.6 years. More injuries were observed in warmer months. The mean visual acuity for all available injured eyes was 0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/30 Snellen). The most common categories of chemical agents were cleaning agents, personal care products, and automotive chemicals. Thirty-nine cases were observed as having misidentified a product which led to injury. Conclusion: Patterns of eye trauma resulting from chemicals differ by gender, across age groups, and during different months of the year. In most cases, chemical eye injuries do not threaten sight. Improvements in product labeling and design could represent an avenue to prevent some chemical eye injuries.

AB - Purpose: To describe the epidemiology and identify categories of agents involved in chemical eye injuries. Methods: Retrospective case series of consecutive cases of chemical eye injury presenting to the emergency department (ED) at a large eye hospital. Six-hundred and thirty-three patients presented to the ED between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2009 for treatment of 640 chemical eye injuries. Information was collected via medical record review and chemical agents were classified into logical categories based on the patient-reported intended use of the product. Demographic measures, month of service, work-related status, and visual acuity at presentation were described overall and by chemical agent category. Results: Males were more often observed than females (58.4% vs. 41.6%). The mean age across all categories was 33.6 years. More injuries were observed in warmer months. The mean visual acuity for all available injured eyes was 0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/30 Snellen). The most common categories of chemical agents were cleaning agents, personal care products, and automotive chemicals. Thirty-nine cases were observed as having misidentified a product which led to injury. Conclusion: Patterns of eye trauma resulting from chemicals differ by gender, across age groups, and during different months of the year. In most cases, chemical eye injuries do not threaten sight. Improvements in product labeling and design could represent an avenue to prevent some chemical eye injuries.

KW - Chemical

KW - Descriptive

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Household cleaner

KW - Injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864830748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864830748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02713683.2012.681747

DO - 10.3109/02713683.2012.681747

M3 - Review article

VL - 37

SP - 787

EP - 793

JO - Current Eye Research

JF - Current Eye Research

SN - 0271-3683

IS - 9

ER -